What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am guessing it was a liberal scientist who blamed impotence on COVID and not the Vaccine? See, that would make sense.
Nah, it was guys who couldn’t get it up when they got sick with COVID.
Interesting that you think science is a political field of study.
Was Einstein liberal, or conservative? Marie Curie? Copernicus? Salk? Newton? Faraday?
 
Look that up instead of listening to “time travelers” on Art Bell archives.

What? I’m not sure who Art Bell is. Are you sure you’re not the crazy paranoid one?

Ever hear of CVID impotence?

Ok. Let’s break this down, dipshit.

1. This isn’t me saying this. This is a peer reviewed study:


2. Just because covid can cause impotence doesn’t mean the vaccines can’t cause low sperm count. What kind of colossal d-bag gaslighting is that?

Rob’s logic: “I got covid, so I’m impotent, so let me also take a vaccine to completely put the nail in my coffin for all of my genitals ever working properly again.”

Rob logic 🤡
 
What? I’m not sure who Art Bell is. Are you sure you’re not the crazy paranoid one?

Ok. Let’s break this down, dipshit.

1. This isn’t me saying this. This is a peer reviewed study:


2. Just because covid can cause impotence doesn’t mean the vaccines can’t cause low sperm count. What kind of colossal d-bag gaslighting is that?

Rob’s logic: “I got covid, so I’m impotent, so let me also take a vaccine to completely put the nail in my coffin for all of my genitals ever working properly again.”

Rob logic 🤡
If you want to call people "dipshit", maybe do it in another post; not one where you demonstrate a lack of knowledge.
Read the study, dipshit. "Semen volume and motility remain stable."
It only takes ONE sperm, dipshit.

And what do you care, anyway? No one is fvcking your leaky -*** self in your SSI easy chair, anyway.
 
You think empirical studies that are peer-reviewed somehow are molded for a political agenda?
What political agenda does it fit when a COVID sufferer can't get it up?

Have you even begun to provide proof for this? You call me a conspiracy theorist, but I provide mountains of proof, if you actually take time to read through it all.

You gaslit me, even though you saying covid impotence doesn’t disprove covid vaccine low sperm count, lol. They’re two separate things; the existence of one doesn’t disprove the existence of another.

Where’s your f*cking proof?

You’re the biggest info-turd man. You call out so many people and me and you don’t prove shit 🤡
 
I don't think that... I am not a left leaning liberal either. Science makes sense to me.
If you don't think it, then why would you say "It is when it fits the liberal agenda huh?" in response to the question of whether science is a political field of study?
Do you not believe what you yourself type here?
 
If you don't think it, then why would you say "It is when it fits the liberal agenda huh?" in response to the question of whether science is a political field of study?
Do you not believe what you yourself type here?
Oh here we go again.

MEANING THAT WHEN THIS LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT NEEDED TO BLAME SOMETHING, COVID FIT THE BILL JUST FINE FOR THEIR AGENDA.
 
Read the study, dipshit. "Semen volume and motility remain stable."
It only takes ONE sperm, dipshit.

Absolute imbecile:

‘At least 11 million moving sperm are needed in the ****** to achieve a pregnancy even though only one victorious sperm is normally allowed the privilege of fertilizing the egg that was made receptive by the hormonal machinations leading up to and including ovulation. Only a few hundred of the millions of sperm deposited actually reach the egg. It takes all of them working together as a team to cause a pregnancy.’


Go sit at the kiddie table you stupid b*tch; you need a lot of sperm.
 
Have you even begun to provide proof for this? You call me a conspiracy theorist, but I provide mountains of proof, if you actually take time to read through it all.

You gaslit me, even though you saying covid impotence doesn’t disprove covid vaccine low sperm count, lol. They’re two separate things; the existence of one doesn’t disprove the existence of another.

Where’s your f*cking proof?

You’re the biggest info-turd man. You call out so many people and me and you don’t prove shit 🤡
You proof is conspiracy fantasy posted on fantasy websites. That is not "proof' simply because it is what you believe in. You believe in god and satan. That doesn't PROVE they exist. Reading it in the Bilble doesn't PROVE they exist.

Do you even know what "gaslighting" is? Much like when you overused the term "cuck" incorrectly, you are now using "gaslighting" incorrectly. Go look it up, then try to use it properly next time.

I "don't prove shit"? I asked you no less than 5 times for proof of the patent on the Navy anti-gravity spacecraft that you swear exists and has been patented. Where is the proof I asked for?

And when did I ever say Covid impotence does or does not disprove a sperm count change from the vaccine?
It IS interesting that you will use a study of a whopping 37 sperm donors when it supports your declaration that the vax is "bad", but when it's tested on tens of thousands of people with little to no ill effect, it is not enough testing for you to believe it works.
Cherry pick much?
 
You proof is conspiracy fantasy posted on fantasy websites. That is not "proof' simply because it is what you believe in. You believe in god and satan. That doesn't PROVE they exist. Reading it in the Bilble doesn't PROVE they exist.

Do you even know what "gaslighting" is? Much like when you overused the term "cuck" incorrectly, you are now using "gaslighting" incorrectly. Go look it up, then try to use it properly next time.

I "don't prove shit"? I asked you no less than 5 times for proof of the patent on the Navy anti-gravity spacecraft that you swear exists and has been patented. Where is the proof I asked for?

And when did I ever say Covid impotence does or does not disprove a sperm count change from the vaccine?
It IS interesting that you will use a study of a whopping 37 sperm donors when it supports your declaration that the vax is "bad", but when it's tested on tens of thousands of people with little to no ill effect, it is not enough testing for you to believe it works.
Cherry pick much?

Still no proof lol. Eat a wiener
 
People like you Rob have dry humor and really don't get sarcasm at all.
I get sarcasm when it is used in the right context. Dropping sarcasm that can easily be considered a genuine opinion during a debate is a bit of a fail.
I wonder if Buck is just being wildly sarcastic with all of that stupid shit he posts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
799,730
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top