What is?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Oh, it’s totally not a nanotech takeover…

‘Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer's new tech to Davos crowd: "ingestible pills" - a pill with a tiny chip that send a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been digested. "Imagine the compliance," he says’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

What a joke. More nonsense. Every fukking thread your ********* *** goes to you fill it up with weird conspiracy theory bullshitt. Put the pipe down bro. Go do some crayon drawings or look up some more kiddie ****. ********.

 

[subzero 5,000+ posts]

covid is a ******* scam. Theses pricks are just warming us up to the big war and famine. Yea, people have breathing problems. along with underlying conditions like gun shot syndrome and vehicular trauma I had covid, at least that's what doctor said.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

covid is a ******* scam. Theses pricks are just warming us up to the big war and famine. Yea, people have breathing problems. along with underlying conditions like gun shot syndrome and vehicular trauma I had covid, at least that's what doctor said.

This guy got stabbed in the face, but this diagnostic tool not meant to be used as a diagnostic tool says he has covid.

The PCR test being used as the diagnostic tool is the biggest fraud of this whole thing. They can raise or lower the PCR sensitivity, basically, and it’ll pick up less or more. It was at a stupid high setting, and PCR’s are designed for more like lab usage. Anybody can ‘test positive so we can artificially boost cases’ for covid with a PCR test, but if you didn’t use a hyped up PCR test, then you couldn’t perpetrate the biggest technocracy takeover that the world has ever seen.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

This guy got stabbed in the face, but this diagnostic tool not meant to be used as a diagnostic tool says he has covid.

The PCR test being used as the diagnostic tool is the biggest fraud of this whole thing. They can raise or lower the PCR sensitivity, basically, and it’ll pick up less or more. It was at a stupid high setting, and PCR’s are designed for more like lab usage. Anybody can ‘test positive so we can artificially boost cases’ for covid with a PCR test, but if you didn’t use a hyped up PCR test, then you couldn’t perpetrate the biggest technocracy takeover that the world has ever seen.

Conspiracy theory BS. It never stops.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘A typical PCR test will amplify (increase the amount) of a specific gene (genetic material that codes for a protein). When it comes to SARS-COV2 that could mean the spike (S) protein which binds to the ACE II receptor on human cells, the nucleocapsid (N) protein which helps to tightly wind up the virus’ genetic material, or it could target the virus’ structural proteins.

Many viruses have conserved regions of their genome meaning that some gene overlap may occur between different viruses. An easy example would be that SARS-COV and SARS-COV2 both contain a gene for the spike protein.

This would mean that if someone suspected of having SARS-COV2 takes PCR test that only checks for the S gene then it would not be able to differentiate between SARS-COV or SARS-COV2 infection and would not provide an accurate test result.

In order to get around this an accurate PCR test would need to test for multiple genes. This procedure is called a multiplex assay, and it helps to exclude any viruses that may have one gene that overlaps with the pathogen in question. Therefore, if we test 3 genes (typically the S, N, and an open reading frame gene- labelled ORF of SARS-COV2) we are far less likely to have an overlap of 2 or more genes between different pathogens. In this instance, an amplification of the S gene as well as the N gene would indicate a SARS-COV2 infection since it is unlikely that 2 pathogens will share both of these genes.’

Answers from an Ex COVID Tester: Can a PCR Test Differentiate Between SARS-COV2 and Other Pathogens?

What does a positive PCR test indicate?

moderndiscontent.substack.com

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

‘A typical PCR test will amplify (increase the amount) of a specific gene (genetic material that codes for a protein). When it comes to SARS-COV2 that could mean the spike (S) protein which binds to the ACE II receptor on human cells, the nucleocapsid (N) protein which helps to tightly wind up the virus’ genetic material, or it could target the virus’ structural proteins.

Many viruses have conserved regions of their genome meaning that some gene overlap may occur between different viruses. An easy example would be that SARS-COV and SARS-COV2 both contain a gene for the spike protein.

This would mean that if someone suspected of having SARS-COV2 takes PCR test that only checks for the S gene then it would not be able to differentiate between SARS-COV or SARS-COV2 infection and would not provide an accurate test result.

In order to get around this an accurate PCR test would need to test for multiple genes. This procedure is called a multiplex assay, and it helps to exclude any viruses that may have one gene that overlaps with the pathogen in question. Therefore, if we test 3 genes (typically the S, N, and an open reading frame gene- labelled ORF of SARS-COV2) we are far less likely to have an overlap of 2 or more genes between different pathogens. In this instance, an amplification of the S gene as well as the N gene would indicate a SARS-COV2 infection since it is unlikely that 2 pathogens will share both of these genes.’

Answers from an Ex COVID Tester: Can a PCR Test Differentiate Between SARS-COV2 and Other Pathogens?

What does a positive PCR test indicate?

moderndiscontent.substack.com

Nobody cares Epstein.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

‘Warner Mendenhall, a lawyer who is working on Jackson’s case, said in a recent interview that Pfizer has “clearly not followed federal procurement laws.”

‘And now they’re saying, ‘of course we didn’t follow federal procurement laws, we didn’t have to—this was just for a prototype,' he added.’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

It’s a war crime to federally mandate an experiment.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

CDC Officials Admit Agency Has Withheld Critical Covid Information From the Public, Including Data About Breakthrough Infections, Over Fears of "Vaccine Hesitancy" | The Gateway Pundit | by Julian Conradson

Throughout the pandemic, the CDC has diligently maintained a running tally of Covid-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths for the public to view - you know, all of the numbers that make up the majority of virus fear ****.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

AI Inventing Its Own Culture, Passing It On to Humans, Sociologists Find

Algorithms could increasingly influence human culture, even though we don't have a good understanding of how they interact with us or each other.

www.vice.com

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

covid is a ******* scam. Theses pricks are just warming us up to the big war and famine. Yea, people have breathing problems. along with underlying conditions like gun shot syndrome and vehicular trauma I had covid, at least that's what doctor said.

Explain the punchline to the Covid "joke".

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

‘Warner Mendenhall, a lawyer who is working on Jackson’s case, said in a recent interview that Pfizer has “clearly not followed federal procurement laws.”

‘And now they’re saying, ‘of course we didn’t follow federal procurement laws, we didn’t have to—this was just for a prototype,' he added.’

ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

It’s a war crime to federally mandate an experiment.

What is your point? That a lawyer wants to win a case? Never heard of THAT happening before...

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

What is your point? That a lawyer wants to win a case? Never heard of THAT happening before...

Do you really want to know my point? My point is that it’s illegal to mandate a prototype. Very, extremely illegal.