Why are people so sensitive now?

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Diick Eater is too dumb to know what my post was and is. He says that he uses facts to argue however he is arguing emotionally in the above post. I am just saying he is a hypocritical flip-flopper. Nothing more, nothing less. His above responses show how little he comprehends. He should stick to eating the diicks.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

You do know people can scroll up and read right?

Just so everyone can se the WHOLE QUOTE:

"Look at diick eaters other post where he says we can't argue with feelings but with facts instead. Hispls indeed posted factual statements."

All this is pointing out your hypocrisy.

He can't figure out how to properly quote, so he creates a word-jumble that goes unread because it is too difficult to differentiate.

Hispls (like many others) has a passion for car audio and occasionally pops into political threads to give his well-versed opinion, whereas shiver-brains rob doesn't know anything about car audio and lives here to stir the pot. That's why I respect hispls's opinions and write off minnesota dipshit who probably voted for the brother-fucker omar.

Genetics tell a lot about a person, but not everything. Genetics absolutely determine *** and gender. If you have a shlong, you should be attracted to puss, and vise-versa. That is the only way that sustains a species. If homosexuality was the normal, the species cannot reproduce and goes extinct.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You do know people can scroll up and read right?

Just so everyone can se the WHOLE QUOTE:

"Look at diick eaters other post where he says we can't argue with feelings but with facts instead. Hispls indeed posted factual statements."

All this is pointing out your hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy because I quote where you used the terms “facts” and “factual” and then claim “I never brought facts as a topic”.
Aside from your inability to even properly spell the words you use to argue, “Look at diick eaters other post" has NOTHING to do with the self-contradiction you made regarding facts.

YOU post the words, then claim you didn't post them. You're a moron, plain and simple, and you continue to demonstrate it publicly and apparently with pride.
Don;t be proud of your failures unless they helped you succeed.
You've shown us you are not successful by any stretch of the imagination.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Hypocrisy because I quote where you used the terms “facts” and “factual” and then claim “I never brought facts as a topic”.
Aside from your inability to even properly spell the words you use to argue, “Look at diick eaters other post" has NOTHING to do with the self-contradiction you made regarding facts.

YOU post the words, then claim you didn't post them. You're a moron, plain and simple, and you continue to demonstrate it publicly and apparently with pride.
Don;t be proud of your failures unless they helped you succeed.
You've shown us you are not successful by any stretch of the imagination.

You can't call me stupid when you don't understand what I am saying. Go eat some wieners fella.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

He can't figure out how to properly quote, so he creates a word-jumble that goes unread because it is too difficult to differentiate.

Hispls (like many others) has a passion for car audio and occasionally pops into political threads to give his well-versed opinion, whereas shiver-brains rob doesn't know anything about car audio and lives here to stir the pot. That's why I respect hispls's opinions and write off minnesota dipshit who probably voted for the brother-fucker omar.

Genetics tell a lot about a person, but not everything. Genetics absolutely determine *** and gender. If you have a shlong, you should be attracted to puss, and vise-versa. That is the only way that sustains a species. If homosexuality was the normal, the species cannot reproduce and goes extinct.

I know how to quote just fine, douche nozzle. As I said before, but your booze-addled mind can't seem to comprehend, it makes more sense when answering point-by-point to post the way i do. It doesn;t ask the reader to remember Txh's entire stupid diatribe or scroll up and down over and over while reading my response.
Go look at an FAQ and tell us if they list all the questions, followed by all the answers.
It not, explain WHY they might do it the way they do.

Your thesis regarding "schlongs" is oversimplified, and childlike.
Please speak to people who are born without genitals. Speak to people who are born with BOTH sets of genitals. Based on your deep knowledge of physiology and psychology, explain which *** those people are supposed to be attracted to.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You can't call me stupid when you don't understand what I am saying. Go eat some wieners fella.

More homosexual offers from a ********** redneck.
An odd obsession you have, there.

And yes, I can call you stupid. Your demonstrable lack of ability in math, language, simple reasoning, and comprehension pretty much verifies the lack of intellect.
If it weren't so sad, your insistence on doubling down when proved wrong and declaring with authority that you are right would be comical.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Uh oh... he is off on a tangent about what if's, maybe's and hypothetical shit.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

More homosexual offers from a ********** redneck.
An odd obsession you have, there.

You think that is an offer? It wasn't... but this is. How about you learn how to get along with people and I will downgrade you to diick liicker.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You think that is an offer? It wasn't... but this is. How about you learn how to get along with people and I will downgrade you to diick liicker.

I get along with people just fine. Do you consider “getting along” to just accept stupid shit that people say as truth, in forum threads where people are there simply to point/counterpoint?
That sounds like a request from a guy who grew up getting participation trophies.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I get along with people just fine. Do you consider “getting along” to just accept stupid shit that people say as truth, in forum threads where people are there simply to point/counterpoint?
That sounds like a request from a guy who grew up getting participation trophies.

I will counter with a question... do you hide in internet forums so you can argue without repercussions or so you don't have to be respectful of people in person? Sometimes people say things that you don't like... do you have to say anything? No. You can just keep it to yourself and move on. That is what people do face to face... but you don't like that do you. You have to say something, don't you. You are probably a coward though and wouldn't dare do the things you do in her to someone in person would you. Sometimes a fist to the grill just isn't worth it huh? So you found a safe place to be you without having to get your asss kicked for being... well, you. Like I said, we get it. Doesn't change who you are though by hiding in here just so you can "have the last word" so to speak. You still eat... diicks.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

I know how to quote just fine, douche nozzle. As I said before, but your booze-addled mind can't seem to comprehend, it makes more sense when answering point-by-point to post the way i do. It doesn;t ask the reader to remember Txh's entire stupid diatribe or scroll up and down over and over while reading my response.
Go look at an FAQ and tell us if they list all the questions, followed by all the answers.
It not, explain WHY they might do it the way they do.

This is how you multi-quote. You stated that it was easier for readers your way. STATED without any reasoning. As a reader, you are incorrect. Maybe others can vouch for your method.

Your thesis regarding "schlongs" is oversimplified, and childlike.
Please speak to people who are born without genitals. Speak to people who are born with BOTH sets of genitals. Based on your deep knowledge of physiology and psychology, explain which *** those people are supposed to be attracted to.

It is not oversimplified. Reproduction and *** are about the only instincts that still drive humans. Please explain rather than throwing out unwarranted adjectives. I used the words "schlong" and "puss" because they are not censored on this website.
People born without genitals or with both sets of genitals are not normal. I guarantee most hermaphrodites and people without genitals would give anything to be "normal".

Did you vote for the brother-fucker omar? You didn't address that.

I don't get offended by being called a redneck. Calling me that says more about you than it does about me.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

"According to Patrick Huber and Kathleen Drowne, the term—originally an allusion to the sunburned red necks of farmers—was not always used as a slur amongst whites. For example, wearing red neckties and kerchiefs to political rallies, some southerners claimed the label as a “badge of class pride for a county’s populist voters.”

I think only an ignorant person would attempt to use the term as an insult.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

"According to Patrick Huber and Kathleen Drowne, the term—originally an allusion to the sunburned red necks of farmers—was not always used as a slur amongst whites. For example, wearing red neckties and kerchiefs to political rallies, some southerners claimed the label as a “badge of class pride for a county’s populist voters.”

I think only an ignorant person would attempt to use the term as an insult.

I am the classic definition of a redneck according to leftists, but leftists can't see beyond their pedestal.

Fa9gots like rob don't hurt my feelings.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I will counter with a question... do you hide in internet forums so you can argue without repercussions or so you don't have to be respectful of people in person? Sometimes people say things that you don't like... do you have to say anything? No. You can just keep it to yourself and move on. That is what people do face to face... but you don't like that do you. You have to say something, don't you. You are probably a coward though and wouldn't dare do the things you do in her to someone in person would you. Sometimes a fist to the grill just isn't worth it huh? So you found a safe place to be you without having to get your asss kicked for being... well, you. Like I said, we get it. Doesn't change who you are though by hiding in here just so you can "have the last word" so to speak. You still eat... diicks.

"I will counter with a question..."


I argue here like I do in person. I'm not afraid to do so. And if someone argues back with facts and evidence, I don't feel the urge to rearrange their dental work. If I quote a statistic and their immediate go-to is to call me a diick-eater, or that my mother is a whore, then the dental work might occur.

So tell us: When you argue with someone in public, are you the tough guy that you are here, and immediately call them a "diick-licker", or do you hold back for fear of getting bltch-slapped like you did to your ex-girlfriend and your sister?

You have expressed the sentiment MANY times that you dislike that I argue with people who argue back with me. YOU are one of those people who argue back.
IF you hate the idea so much, why do you do it? Or do you just hate being argued with and always want what you say to just be accepted as true and accurate? That puts you squarely in the category of "snowflake".

If you are so uncomfortable with what happens in Thunderdome, then perhaps Thunderdome is not the place for you. Maybe go into a safer place and discuss things that can't be argued, like Ohm's law in relation to alternator and battery choice. Or Thiele-small parameters in relation to sub box size. Crossover points. Wire gauge. Etc.
Or maybe just talk about your opinions on things where you CAN'T be wrong, like your favorite candy, or color, or preferring redheads over blondes, or normally aspirated over turbo.
If you don't want arguments, discuss stuff that can't be argued.
It's honestly not that difficult.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

"According to Patrick Huber and Kathleen Drowne, the term—originally an allusion to the sunburned red necks of farmers—was not always used as a slur amongst whites. For example, wearing red neckties and kerchiefs to political rallies, some southerners claimed the label as a “badge of class pride for a county’s populist voters.”

I think only an ignorant person would attempt to use the term as an insult.

And "egregious" used to be a good thing.
Word usage changes and evolves. Redneck is no longer used as compliment in the vernacular, even if you would like it to be in order to change a narrative.

"Cambridge Dictionary definition states: "A poor, white person without education, esp. one living in the countryside in the southern US, who is believed to have prejudiced ideas and beliefs. This word is usually considered offensive."