What annoys the ***** outta you/pisses you off...

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Try reading the sites I posted. You have the right to defend yourself on your property and others property as well.

Wisconsin has Castle Doctrine

There is no duty to retreat inside one's home, or place of business. For deadly force to be justified it must be in defense of one's self or others. The person must believe that there is a real threat of death, or bodily injury, and all other means of defusing the situation must have be exhausted before using deadly force. Deadly force may not be used in the sole defense of property.

Statute
895.62, 939.48, 940.01

Been told more then once by a lawyer, state police and 2 retired judges I have the right to defend myself in my home. If someone comes into my house and has a gun, knife or baseball bat and threatens me I have every right to shoot in that instance and I will instantly. Even if he just decides to break in I have the right to self defense of my life and property. I will always give a warning no matter what but if he decides to take one step forward and ignores that warning while I am pointing a loaded gun with hollow points it well he is going down right then and there.

One warning is enough in this state according to people involved with law as I have stated. Not gonna listen to someone who doesn't live here or has talked to the amount of people I have involved with gun laws and prosecuting them in this state. Retired Judges even teach classes around here when you do your CCW on this stuff. While I did not need to take it I still took it to talk to him since I've known him for a long time. Been through more gun classes then I can count at this point as I use to take part in competitions since I was able to for many years. You learn real quickly the laws of your state when you do those.

Yep. Some here who have no practical experience or knowledge of the law think they can do what they see on TV or in the movies because it's "common sense" and "the right thing to do".

The law doesn't always follow those principles, but some internet tough guys seem to truly believe it does, and that they'll get a high-five and be sent on their merry way.
Reality is far different.

This story is one of thousands. Will the homeowner lose the case? probably not. Will it cost him a butt-ton in legal fees and ruin his life? Probably. And he didn;t get any high-fives or a ticker tape parade:

Man Who Shot Intruder In His Home Sued For Wrongful Death | Gilman & Bedigian

A judge has decided that a man who shot and killed an intruder in his home, can be sued by the dead man's family.

www.gilmanbedigian.com

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

It was easy to come up with. First you claimed that insurance companies worth billions were the ones hurting from the riots, not the businesses that actually burned down. Then you falsely claimed a 17 year old shot someone in the back and should be charged with reckless homicide. No one shot anyone in the back. You’re on the side of the oppressors and don’t even know it. That’s our society right now in a nutshell. Idiots who think social media is real life. You and people like you are dangerous to a free and open society.

Did you hear the testimony during the trial? Here, I highlighted where it clearly states that he shot the unarmed guy in the back. Let me guess, you think it's "Fake News" right? So an underage kid carrying an AR down the street who then shoots an unarmed guy in the back is your definition of a free and open society? Come on man!

 

[SlugButter]

Did you hear the testimony during the trial? Here, I highlighted where it clearly states that he shot the unarmed guy in the back. Let me guess, you think it's "Fake News" right? So an underage kid carrying an AR down the street who then shoots an unarmed guy in the back is your definition of a free and open society? Come on man!

You are an idiot. I watched the literal police video during the trial that showed the shootings, and no one was shot in the back. What the fvck are you talking about? You need to get your *** off social media. It’s turning your brain into mushroom soup. Jesus Christ you can’t make this shit up.

 

[SlugButter]

Douchebags who spend enough time on social media to be that misinformed would be annoying if it wasn’t for feeling sorry for them. It must be depressing to live in a made up world of hate and misinformation.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You are an idiot. I watched the literal police video during the trial that showed the shootings, and no one was shot in the back. What the fvck are you talking about? You need to get your *** off social media. It’s turning your brain into mushroom soup. Jesus Christ you can’t make this shit up.

The pathologist testified he was shot in the back. You know better than the pathologist giving testimony? You should be called on the stand then. Why are you sitting home chatting when you could change the course of history?

"Kelley, the pathologist, said Rosenbaum was shot four times by someone who was within 4 feet of him. He testified that Rosenbaum was first wounded in the groin and then in the hand and thigh as he faced Rittenhouse, and then was shot in the head and in the back."

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

You are an idiot. I watched the literal police video during the trial that showed the shootings, and no one was shot in the back. What the fvck are you talking about? You need to get your *** off social media. It’s turning your brain into mushroom soup. Jesus Christ you can’t make this shit up.

That was the fukking testimony under oath wise guy. You can call me names all you want I really son't care. Do you have a link to the first shooting? He fukking killed the unarmed guy when he shot him in the back. Then he called his buddy and told him what he just did. Learn the facts of the case before you come at me.

 

[Jesus Christ]

Dude should have wasted all the BLM rioters....

 

[SlugButter]

The pathologist testified he was shot in the back. You know better than the pathologist giving testimony? You should be called on the stand then. Why are you sitting home chatting when you could change the course of history?

"Kelley, the pathologist, said Rosenbaum was shot four times by someone who was within 4 feet of him. He testified that Rosenbaum was first wounded in the groin and then in the hand and thigh as he faced Rittenhouse, and then was shot in the head and in the back."

It was also testified that he was “bull rushing” the defendant, which is why he was shot where he was. You and Bobby act like he shot someone who was running away, and that’s being dishonest about the facts to push your narrative,. There is literal drone footage of this shooting. You’re leaving out information on purpose.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

You are an idiot. I watched the literal police video during the trial that showed the shootings, and no one was shot in the back. What the fvck are you talking about? You need to get your *** off social media. It’s turning your brain into mushroom soup. Jesus Christ you can’t make this shit up.

Can you post the Police video of the first shooting please? I'll hang up and wait. Let me guess, you can't find it now. Imagine that.

 

[SlugButter]

That was the fukking testimony under oath wise guy. You can call me names all you want I really son't care. Do you have a link to the first shooting? He fukking killed the unarmed guy when he shot him in the back. Then he called his buddy and told him what he just did. Learn the facts of the case before you come at me.

Nope. You didn’t watch the testimony, obviously, or you’re leaving out information on purpose.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

It was also testified that he was “bull rushing” the defendant, which is why he was shot where he was. You and Bobby act like he shot someone who was running away, and that’s being dishonest about the facts to push your narrative,. There is literal drone footage of this shooting. You’re leaving out information on purpose.

Rittenhouse testified himself that the guy never touched him. Come on man. Watch the trial or at least read the transcripts.

 

[SlugButter]

Can you post the Police video of the first shooting please? I'll hang up and wait. Let me guess, you can't find it now. Imagine that.

Oh, now you want me to find the information for you, instead of you doing the work to find out why you think a kid should spend the rest of his life in prison. Way to have an informed decision there booby.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Nope. You didn’t watch the testimony, obviously, or you’re leaving out information on purpose.

So, what did I leave out? Please post the Police video of the first shooting that you watched.

 

[SlugButter]

You can find the drone footage yourself. They showed the whole video in court.

 

[SlugButter]

So, what did I leave out? Please post the Police video of the first shooting that you watched.

You left out any evidence at all. You’re just posting social media conspiracy theories about the incident. How ironic…..