I'm not religious lol. Nice try. You have to make so many assumptions to insult me! Operation Lockstep was a real document. I don't trust USA today as new source.
Everyone who's taken the MRNA shot, which was always called gene therapy nanotechnolgy by the companies that made them, those people are the human trials. This type of nanotech has never been successfully used or deployed, and the covid MRNA gene therapy that instructs your cells to produce spike proteins. That's not really a vaccine by any traditional definition. No long term studies have been performed on this vaccine; YOU are the human trials, and I genuinely hope the trials go well. Who knows what side effects will pop up in the future. Seriously, who knows? Nobody knows, because no long term safety trials were ran.
Go ahead and ignore this one:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4817894/
Here's the title, lulz:
mRNA: Fulfilling the Promise of Gene Therapy
"In vitro–transcribed mRNA (IVT mRNA) is emerging as a new class of drug that has the potential to play a role in gene therapy that once was envisioned for DNA.
1"
YOU are the one who brought up hell being manifested by TV. You are the one who brought up the "reckoning". Both hell and a worldwide reckoning by some higher power are religious concepts.
Now you're trying to put more spin on your bullshit by getting into the semantics of the definition of a vaccination. Except you make an error in not knowing the definition of a vaccine:
"a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease." This encompasses the COVID vaccine.
So, let's recap.
1. You make claims you have not and seemingly cannot support with evidence or fact or proofs.
2. You bandy about concept like "Hegelian dialect" as if they strengthen your argument, except you don't seem to understand the concept of the term, because it actually shows you HAVEN"T supported your argument.
3. Your very critical analysis is "
seems suspect to me".
4. You try to shift the focus away from your inability to provide a cogent argument by discussing immortality in the context of the vaccine, which NO ONE has even brought up (and for good reason)
5. You bring up "operation lockstep" which is a hoax claim that has been disproved easily, yet you believe it exists.
6. You claim to have studied the scientific data extensively to support your feelings/opinions/beliefs/faiths, yet can cite none of the studies or references.
7. You make several references to religion to support your arguments, but then claim you are not religious.
That is a shit-ton of fail right there. Maybe try some critical thinking and due diligence instead of listening to conspiracy idiots like Alex Jones.
Look up Occam's razor. Learn it. Live it.
