zx350.4 vs zx650.4

[malibujason79 10+ year member]

Looking for one amp to run my components 100w rms each and one 8" sub rated at 200w rms. Can i get by with using the zx350.4 getting 60w rms to the components and 175w rms bridged to the sub? Or would i be better off stepping up to the zx650.4 120w rms and 325w rms bridged and adjusting my gains using using a dvom. My goal is to have a nice clean sounding system that i can still turn up some if i wanted. (I mainly listen to rock/metal) Ive had good luck with kicker amps in the past so i would really like to use one again.

Thanks Jason

Click to read more...

 

[aturcotte127317 10+ year member]

i have a kx350.4 pushing my comps now, and it works great, if you are not going to be turning it up too much too often you can get by with the 350.4

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

I say give it a go with the 350, and see how you like it first. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

650.4, running active //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

No sense wasting a perfectly good 4-channel on passives...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif