Wounded soldiers asked to return signing bonuses

[eli07 10+ year member]

Someone should be forced to go fight over in iraq also... hmmmm

I was looking at joining the millitary and getting out of this crazy city, but I just lost all hopes on it now.

 

[jkulysses 10+ year member]

Someone should be forced to go fight over in iraq also... hmmmm
I was looking at joining the millitary and getting out of this crazy city, but I just lost all hopes on it now.

Just go in the coast guard.

 

[jrerun21 10+ year member]

This is like the opposite of what should happen... You would think that after being disabled and impaired you would give the soldiers more; not take monies back. Outrageous.

 

[2kchevy06civic 5,000+ posts]

Horrible, scandalous, outrageous, and above all disgraceful

I hope the people who thought of that lose an arm or a leg and get self pwned.

 

[95ZJ 10+ year member]

****. That.

 

[CaliforniabOY5 10+ year member]

Bush Can **** **** And His ****ing Administration.. **** Them

i dont think this is a bush thing...

 

[DBfan187 5,000+ posts]

Well if they didnt live up to their end of the deal they probably should have to give it back.

They probably should have read the fine print when they were signing, and realized if they didn't serve out the term they would have to give some back. It's not my fault as a tax payer that they frivolously squandered all the money before they left the country when they should saved some to pay back if they couldn't live up to the terms of the agreement.

As much as I hate to say it, Faulkton is correct. They signed a contract and didn't fulfill it.

 

[Ignatowski 5,000+ posts]

great way to support the troops.......

sounds like some corporate scum ******* looser

came up with this idea

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

fucked up!

Thats all I can say too.

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

As much as I hate to say it, Faulkton is correct. They signed a contract and didn't fulfill it.

True enough. If you sign contracts with the Devil, you may just get burned. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif

 

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

great way to support the troops.......sounds like some corporate scum ******* looser

came up with this idea

its called Lean Six Sigma, it's the military's way of streamlining processes and finances. They modeled it after Toyota I believe.

 

[jkulysses 10+ year member]

As much as I hate to say it, Faulkton is correct. They signed a contract and didn't fulfill it.

I just don't see how you guys figure that these troops are not fulfilling their contract. The majority of these guys that get hurt over there try to stay in but the military forces them out because they are not handicapped. They technically got hurt at work doing what the military told them they had to do so I just don't see how they didn't live up the their end of the deal. I've signed that contract and I got a $6,000 cash bonus. It doesn't say in the contract that if we, the govt, make you go to war and you get hurt you have to pay the money back.

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

I just don't see how you guys figure that these troops are not fulfilling their contract. The majority of these guys that get hurt over there try to stay in but the military forces them out because they are not handicapped. They technically got hurt at work doing what the military told them they had to do so I just don't see how they didn't live up the their end of the deal. I've signed that contract and I got a $6,000 cash bonus. It doesn't say in the contract that if we, the govt, make you go to war and you get hurt you have to pay the money back.

It doesn't have to be worded like that. You breached contract by not staying the term you agreed to. Once a contract is breached by one party then the other party can take recourse.

 

[DBfan187 5,000+ posts]

I just don't see how you guys figure that these troops are not fulfilling their contract. The majority of these guys that get hurt over there try to stay in but the military forces them out because they are not handicapped. They technically got hurt at work doing what the military told them they had to do so I just don't see how they didn't live up the their end of the deal. I've signed that contract and I got a $6,000 cash bonus. It doesn't say in the contract that if we, the govt, make you go to war and you get hurt you have to pay the money back.

I understand what you're getting saying and I agree, but that's not what the agreements were on the document they signed.

It doesn't have to be worded like that. You breached contract by not staying the term you agreed to. Once a contract is breached by one party then the other party can take recourse.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif read the fine print people.

 

[dirtyg 10+ year member]

a contract is a contract but that is just pure bullshit. That wasnt the idea of anyone who served in the milatary,and there lies the problem the signing bonus from my view is an encentive to join and i woudnt return shit if i was injured and they sent me home.but wtf do i kno