no not really, every time it was re written it was just slightly better adapted to the lauguage it is in, ive read a few versions and many examples of literal translations to english from the original context, all it is was changing grammar to make sense in english. theyre are however, some books claiming to be the bible that are completely askewThe original bible maybe... but how many times has it been re-written, and how many versions are there now? Every time some leader started feeling like he was the sh1t, he had someone re-write the bible the way he felt it should be.
well thats the debate, neither side of this old arguement accepts "proof" that the other presents so to debate it whether there is a god or not (which is a theory of science and proof) without proof is very ironic. I just have faith, call me stupid, call me whatever you want, i live the same as you do.There is no god and the bible was written by old ass men that knew very little if anything about the earth let alone the universe.
everyone has their opinion.. prove its not true.. lol.. dare yawell thats the debate, neither side of this old arguement accepts "proof" that the other presents so to debate it whether there is a god or not (which is a theory of science and proof) without proof is very ironic. I just have faith, call me stupid, call me whatever you want, i live the same as you do.
The burden of proof is on those that say there is,it's something that cannot be proven or dis proven,same thing for fairies and elfs. If it makes someone a better person then good.everyone has their opinion.. prove its not true.. lol.. dare ya
wow, an athiest that has beliefs based upon opinion....thats hilarious.The burden of proof is on those that say there is,it's something that cannot be proven or dis proven,same thing for fairies and elfs. If it makes someone a better person then good.