Freedom of speech is a protected form of expression. Yelling, shouting or otherwise of the word fire in a crowded theater IS NOT protected by the 1st amendment.
You have no problem looking past lawlessness, breaking the law, illegal activities of the political party members you support. You have no problem insulting, berating, belittling or calling out any Trump supporter and you don't even need any information to do so other than that trigger word "Trump" being attached to that person.
Of course not. Is it prudent to walk through life just assuming all Trump supporters are beneath you, uneducated or mentally ill?
In these cases? Your blind biases.
You apparently have no idea why I would dislike Biden. His sniffing of kids is pretty disturbing, yes, however this is not why I dislike him. I find him to be a poor President with poor ethics and morals.
I assume you meant you "dislike" Trump because of his alleged ****** impropriety... dislike out of jealousy because he has game or because your view of *** is repressed or it is just one more thing you can use as fuel to drive your biased hatred of Trump. There are plenty of Democrats who have done some pretty messed up things sexually... why not call them out too and include them in your hatred?
The point is you are one-way with your bias. It's obvious. It's perfectly fine for you to be that way however, it is going to and has caused conflicts.
Are you now going to take this personal, lash out and insult me in a condescending way, tell me my opinions are wrong, flip out because I spoke poorly of Biden, scream and shout because I used the trigger word 4 times?
This is how you tell them to eat shit:John Kerry can take his animatronic face and eat shit with it:
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
I’ll assume you’re just playing the contrary role and don’t actually believe this fallacy, so I’ll continue the debate:Freedom of speech is a protected form of expression. Yelling, shouting or otherwise of the word fire in a crowded theater IS NOT protected by the 1st amendment.
Can you provide an example where I said or intimated these things you accuse me of (“looking past lawlessness”, etc)?You have no problem looking past lawlessness, breaking the law, illegal activities of the political party members you support. You have no problem insulting, berating, belittling or calling out any Trump supporter and you don't even need any information to do so other than that trigger word "Trump" being attached to that person.
It certainly can be. It’s playing the odds.Of course not. Is it prudent to walk through life just assuming all Trump supporters are beneath you, uneducated or mentally ill?
Please share one of the things you consider a “blind bias” that I have.In these cases? Your blind biases.
“Sniffing kids”, yet when I discuss Trumps own wife and many others accusing him of ****, plus his own admittance of ****** improprieties, you’ll say something like “women lie”.You apparently have no idea why I would dislike Biden. His sniffing of kids is pretty disturbing, yes, however this is not why I dislike him. I find him to be a poor President with poor ethics and morals.
Dislike “because he has game”? Not even sure what that means.I assume you meant you "dislike" Trump because of his alleged ****** impropriety... dislike out of jealousy because he has game or because your view of *** is repressed or it is just one more thing you can use as fuel to drive your biased hatred of Trump. There are plenty of Democrats who have done some pretty messed up things sexually... why not call them out too and include them in your hatred?
Bias is one-way by its very nature. Maybe you’re just upset that I’m biased against Trump when you’d rather i ignore all of the bad stuff about him?The point is you are one-way with your bias. It's obvious. It's perfectly fine for you to be that way however, it is going to and has caused conflicts.
I insult based on facts. Maybe you’d rather I make stuff up like you do. Not my style.Are you now going to take this personal, lash out and insult me in a condescending way, tell me my opinions are wrong, flip out because I spoke poorly of Biden, scream and shout because I used the trigger word 4 times?
This is how you tell them to eat shit:
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Listen Rob, I spoke with an attorney, it is not protected by the 1st amendment. I don't have to think of the 2A for anything. I went straight to a person who's job it is to know the law. I am satisfied even if you aren't.I’ll assume you’re just playing the contrary role and don’t actually believe this fallacy, so I’ll continue the debate:
Yes, yelling fire is free speech protected by 1A. The fact that it is a right does not mean it will always be legal, and that’s the big difference.
Think of the 2A: We have the RIGHT to bear arms, but go right ahead and open carry your Beretta in Manhattan without a permit/license to do so.
It will not end well.
Right?
Yes, when you said a little voter fraud is acceptable. Fraud is fraud no matter if it is only 1 case.Can you provide an example where I said or intimated these things you accuse me of (“looking past lawlessness”, etc)?
There is plenty wrong with Biden as well but that doesn't mean I would sit here and bash you and all other supporters of him. In your mind if you support Trump, you are just as bad as Trump. Again, your mentality that causes rifts.And no, I do t have a problem belittling/berating/insulting a Trump supporter.
There is enough known about him at this point that no one should continue to support him. But people still support the likes of Bill Cosby, Adolf Hitler, and plenty of other trash.
Would you be happy if I berated them publicly too?
Is that the same as choosing to be a piece of shit on purpose?It certainly can be. It’s playing the odds.
How about your above statement... playing the odds.Please share one of the things you consider a “blind bias” that I have.
Women do lie. Do you think that is up for debate? The only reason you accept any of that is because you hate Trump.“Sniffing kids”, yet when I discuss Trumps own wife and many others accusing him of ****, plus his own admittance of ****** improprieties, you’ll say something like “women lie”.
And not see the hypocrisy in your thinking.
I am not surprised.Dislike “because he has game”? Not even sure what that means.
Hey I am with you. **** is pretty messed up and can ruin lives. Including those ACCUSED of ****. That is why I would need proof of said **** before I could say, guilty. We have been round here before. Please move on.I don’t hate Trump and then find reasons why. The reasons are the things that make me hate him. You have it backwards.
“Repressed view of ***”? No, unlike you I just don’t think **** is nothing more than a lie women use against men, or that men should be able to do whatever they want to women with impunity.
I should have said bigoted against Trump and that has made you biased. Better?Bias is one-way by its very nature. Maybe you’re just upset that I’m biased against Trump when you’d rather i ignore all of the bad stuff about him?
You actually don't. This statement is a lie. You have insulted me on nothing more than your assumptions. It IS your style, your method of oporations and your status quo all in one.I insult based on facts. Maybe you’d rather I make stuff up like you do. Not my style.
Lash out? Like tell people to off themselves? Oh, that’s your bag.
Stick to facts, kid.
How much money? Am I in a dream? Is this really the president?
Just like the “doctor” who told you there are no nerves in bone, your “lawyer” is wrong.Listen Rob, I spoke with an attorney, it is not protected by the 1st amendment. I don't have to think of the 2A for anything. I went straight to a person who's job it is to know the law. I am satisfied even if you aren't.
I NEVER said voter fraud is acceptable. I said it exists. So does murder. That’s not acceptable either.Yes, when you said a little voter fraud is acceptable. Fraud is fraud no matter if it is only 1 case.
Except you have. I can’t tell you how many times you have classified and described liberals or democrats as a singular entity.There is plenty wrong with Biden as well but that doesn't mean I would sit here and bash you and all other supporters of him. In your mind if you support Trump, you are just as bad as Trump. Again, your mentality that causes rifts.
A tangent that has nothing to do with statistics or odds.Is that the same as choosing to be a piece of shit on purpose?
How about your above statement... playing the odds.
Except you think every **** accusation is a lie because you desire to see the **** happen in order to believe it happened.Women do lie. Do you think that is up for debate? The only reason you accept any of that is because you hate Trump.
Your only acceptable proof is to see it. Odd.I am not surprised.
Hey I am with you. **** is pretty messed up and can ruin lives. Including those ACCUSED of ****. That is why I would need proof of said **** before I could say, guilty. We have been round here before. Please move on.
The bias is after the fact. Not sure why the concept confuses you.I should have said bigoted against Trump and that has made you biased. Better?
All my insults are based on things you have posted in this forum. If those things are lies, that’s on you.You actually don't. This statement is a lie. You have insulted me on nothing more than your assumptions. It IS your style, your method of oporations and your status quo all in one.
I am sure you are far more qualified to speak on either topic Rob the internet fact checker.Just like the “doctor” who told you there are no nerves in bone, your “lawyer” is wrong.
You did actually.I NEVER said voter fraud is acceptable. I said it exists. So does murder. That’s not acceptable either.
I know you can't tell me how many times... because you are wrong.Except you have. I can’t tell you how many times you have classified and described liberals or democrats as a singular entity.
If you don’t like it, why do you do it?
It does but you will ignore it so you don't have to answer it.A tangent that has nothing to do with statistics or odds.
See, you make false statement after false statement. I have never said every **** accusation is a lie.Except you think every **** accusation is a lie because you desire to see the **** happen in order to believe it happened.
Odd to a person who has no problem forming an opinion or conclusion without proof yet demands proof and facts from all others. Seriously, knock it off Rob.Your only acceptable proof is to see it. Odd.
They are based on your assumptions and lack of comprehension.The bias is after the fact. Not sure why the concept confuses you.
All my insults are based on things you have posted in this forum. If those things are lies, that’s on you.