Winners only.

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So you ignoring biological advantages similar sized men over women similar sized women...follow the science Rob

So you think two people of similar abilities are not capable of competing against each other becasue one was born with a pen*s, and one with a vag*na?
Maybe you were too young for Billie Jean vs Bobby. Ever hear of Jackie Tonawanda? 2nd round knockout against a male boxer. Danica Patrick? Race car driver and Indy winner. Carissa Moore? beat men in professional surfboard competitions.

But yeah, men are inherently superior against women who are similarly built and have the same abilities. It's especially evident when female arm wrestlers go up against males.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

"Joe Biden Is A Criminal" Says Ex-Obama Whistleblower Alleging Family "Kickback Scheme" | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Follow the science RobGMN...not your feelings buddy...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Follow the science RobGMN...not your feelings buddy...

I do follow the science.
The guy who covers up with a hand, sleeve, or tissue for a cough or sneeze but not a mask for COVID is following his feelings.
The guy who thinks vaccines for school kids are simply "a choice" is following his feelings.
The guy who thinks two people of the same strengths and abilities cannot fairly compete against each other because of the genitals they were born with, is following his feelings.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

You obviously don't if you can't comprehend the differences in male and female anatomy and the biological advantages men have in competition...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You obviously don't if you can't comprehend the differences in male and female anatomy and the biological advantages men have in competition...

What is the biological advantage of a man over a woman when the woman can bench press more than the man, or run faster, or drive better, throw a javelin further, hit a ball over a net more accurately?

What biological advantage does an uncoordinated 5'9" man have over a 6' woman who can dribble, pass, run, shoot?
What biological advantage do the men on the shooting team have over the women who can outshoot them?

And I'm not talking the general claims, I'm talking about comparing people of similar structure and abilities.
If both can dead lift a maximum of 325 lbs, does the male lift it "better" because he is male?
If both can do the high jump to a max of 6 feet, is the man's jump better because he is a man?

Explain the science how two of the same results are "different". Maybe this is like Thxone's "choice but not a choice" and "in but not in" theories.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

You're using the exception as the rule ffs...the more you "prove" your point on this...the more ignorant you sound

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I'm guessing you didn't even look at the pictures on that Duke law paper I linked

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You're using the exception as the rule ffs...the more you "prove" your point on this...the more ignorant you sound

Ahhh, so you ARE just like Thxone. Completely ignore any factors that contradict your theory.
He did that with his "choice but not a choice" theory.

You are saying that women who have similar capabilities to men are the exception, therefore they do not exist and all men are superior to women in all sports.
Pretty scientific conclusion there, bud.

It's comical how people like you (anti-maskers, anti-vaxxers, science deniers) come up with all these theories that collapse under even the most simple scrutiny or challenge, yet you hang onto them for dear life while shouting "everyone else is making decisions based on their feelings!".
Ironic.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I'm not denying there are exceptions...I'm also not using those exceptions as the rule like you are...you are literally ignoring science here

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

I'm guessing you didn't even look at the pictures on that Duke law paper I linked

He probably didn’t

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Let’s go lick the world!

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I'm guessing you didn't even look at the pictures on that Duke law paper I linked

Actually, I did. And the article from Duke Law University spoke to AVERAGES.

I was never disputing AVERAGES which covers all male athletes versus all female athletes. I was disputing the methods of judging all athletes based on the singular statistic of whether they were born with a pen*s or a vag*na.
If you read any of my posts, you would understand that.

If it were that simple, there would be no sport where a woman could ever beat a man. Men would simply be superior because they have a pen*s, regardless of all other factors.

Do you consider it to be a truth that men will dominate women in all sports simply because they have a pen*s?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

So if on average men hold a biological advantage...why the fck would you support biological men in women's sports...

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

These biological males are taking opportunities away from women...whether it be scholarships or endorsements...that's an opportunity lost...