Winners only.

[ThxOne Premium Member]

It's not allegedly, they've released the receipt of items seized.

Do these same rules apply to Hillary? Were here classified emails "alleged?" Was the mail server "alleged?" Was there even a search of Mar-a-lago or is that just alleged?

There is no need to jump to hypotheticals. Or to take things personal. I wouldn't hold any weight to "things being released" in this situation where the goal is to smear Trump. If they are trying to build a legal case against him, letting the world know what was seized or what they have against him is not the right way to do it. When playing poker, you don't show your hand before betting.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So, it has to go to court for a person to prove what they say about themselves is true?
Yet, if a woman goes to court and says she was *****, you say she is lying unless you witnessed the ****.
Trump himself said he had documents, but that is not proof enough?

Another corner you painted yourself into.

You do know that just showing up for court isn't proof something happened, right? Just because a woman says she was ***** doesn't mean it happened. She could be lying, absolutely. I have to assume you think that all women who yell **** are Democrats at this point.

Cool, Trump said he "had documents". Let's string him up and burn him at the stake!!! He said he had documents. He also said other things. Saying you have something doesn't mean you are guilty of something. It's nice how you are 100% ok with circumventing the legal system and jump right to adjudication.

To your first question. Yes, if the intent is to make this a legal matter then hell yes. It needs to be proven in court.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Holy fvck, your head is so far up Trump's azz, you can see his tonsils, huh?

He took documents. SOME of them have already been recovered as they were taken without authorization. They were recovered in January of this year. Did you forget that little fact?
They were recovered by the National Archives BECAUSE THEIR REMOVAL BY TRUMP WAS NOT AUTHORIZED.
Unauthorized removal of documents is "doing something wrong".

Before we go a step further, are you suggesting this situation never happened?
Answer with a simple yes, or no.

I wouldn't give you the satisfaction of a simple yes or no. You avoid direct questions like you avoid common sense. 8 pages of Googled responses to something simple like:

Hey Rob, would you vote Republican if it was better for America? Yes or No?

Once you avoided the question you would then team up with Bobby to explain how great hings were under each Democratic administration up to now and how each Republican left a shit storm for Democrats to fix. Then you will show us half a dozen graphs that are irrelevant to the question, say a few bad things about Trump then try to flip the question back around with your own unrelated question.

My head is nowhere near Trumps asss.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You do know that just showing up for court isn't proof something happened, right? Just because a woman says she was ***** doesn't mean it happened. She could be lying, absolutely. I have to assume you think that all women who yell **** are Democrats at this point.

Cool, Trump said he "had documents". Let's string him up and burn him at the stake!!! He said he had documents. He also said other things. Saying you have something doesn't mean you are guilty of something. It's nice how you are 100% ok with circumventing the legal system and jump right to adjudication.

To your first question. Yes, if the intent is to make this a legal matter then hell yes. It needs to be proven in court.

So then why would you think showing up for court would prove that Trump lied when he said he had documents? Again, you destroy your arguments with your own arguments.
Pick a lane, kid.

Here is a letter from NARA to the oversight committee, detailing items found in the FIRST set of documents recovered from Trump in February. Please read it very carefully, and explain to us how it is all bullshit and Trump never took any such documents and that the documents he didn't take were not classified:https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/ferriero-response-to-02.09.2022-maloney-letter.02.18.2022.pdf
Here's an excerpt to give you a running start:

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I wouldn't give you the satisfaction of a simple yes or no. You avoid direct questions like you avoid common sense. 8 pages of Googled responses to something simple like:

Hey Rob, would you vote Republican if it was better for America? Yes or No?

Once you avoided the question you would then team up with Bobby to explain how great hings were under each Democratic administration up to now and how each Republican left a shit storm for Democrats to fix. Then you will show us half a dozen graphs that are irrelevant to the question, say a few bad things about Trump then try to flip the question back around with your own unrelated question.

My head is nowhere near Trumps asss.

In other words, you won't answer with a simple yes or no. It could show you have no true conviction in your own feelings.

I have voted Republican when I felt it was the best option. I ma not beholden to a party simply by party name. Anyone who is is probably a fvcking idiot.

And, we circle back around to your feelings that all of the metrics used to indicate a good economy are bullshit, either because: 1) you don't understand what they mean 2) you are unable to do better in a good economy 3) the state of the economy doesn't affect you, and you felling that all history of what the administrations inherit when they take office is bullshit.

When you deny Trump did a bad thing when Trump HIMSELF admits doing a bad thing, one can only assume you have your head up his azz and want to protect him in any way possible.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

In other words, you won't answer with a simple yes or no. It could show you have no true conviction in your own feelings.

I have voted Republican when I felt it was the best option. I ma not beholden to a party simply by party name. Anyone who is is probably a fvcking idiot.

And, we circle back around to your feelings that all of the metrics used to indicate a good economy are bullshit, either because: 1) you don't understand what they mean 2) you are unable to do better in a good economy 3) the state of the economy doesn't affect you, and you felling that all history of what the administrations inherit when they take office is bullshit.

When you deny Trump did a bad thing when Trump HIMSELF admits doing a bad thing, one can only assume you have your head up his azz and want to protect him in any way possible.

Is that what you are doing when you don't answer with a yes or no?

I am not denying Trump did anything. Why is it when people don't parrot what you say you speak for them and just assume they are against you?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So then why would you think showing up for court would prove that Trump lied when he said he had documents? Again, you destroy your arguments with your own arguments.
Pick a lane, kid.

Here is a letter from NARA to the oversight committee, detailing items found in the FIRST set of documents recovered from Trump in February. Please read it very carefully, and explain to us how it is all bullshit and Trump never took any such documents and that the documents he didn't take were not classified:https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/ferriero-response-to-02.09.2022-maloney-letter.02.18.2022.pdf
Here's an excerpt to give you a running start:

View attachment 41644

How am I destroying anything... you are the one making these statements for me then answering yourself. Weirdo.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Is that what you are doing when you don't answer with a yes or no?

I am not denying Trump did anything. Why is it when people don't parrot what you say you speak for them and just assume they are against you?

You are flat out denying he had classified documents even when he said he had them.
"There is no need to jump to hypotheticals." Your words regarding the list of things recovered in the raid.
You said you will not give any credence to the reports of what was found or released.
"Saying you have something doesn't mean you are guilty of something." is a direct, unedited quote of your own words, posted by you.

So, speak to the response from the NARA to the committee: Was the NARA lying when they said they recovered classified documents from Trump in February 2022?

7. Has the Archivist notified the Attorney General that former President Trump removed presidential records from the White House? If not, why not?
Answer: Because NARA identified classified information in the boxes, NARA staff has been in communication with the Department of Justice.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

@RobGMN

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

@RobGMN

View attachment 41648

Chickenshit.

You "don't care" but here you are, probably hoping to see some pictures so your brain isn't confused by big words.
Speaking of big words Chickenshit, did you ever find proof of the baseless claims you made about me?

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

I hope Rob is the first to get fired...POS