Winners only.

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

YOU are the one who posted that it is OK to use a single set of connections, then explained how using two sets would be different.
So tell us the difference. Show us your expertise.

Do you not comprehend how it works...I've only been back into this about a year now after 20 years out of it...and I figured it out pretty quick buddy...just saying...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Do you not comprehend how it works...I've only been back into this about a year now after 20 years out of it...and I figured it out pretty quick buddy...just saying...

Go ahead and explain why connecting two subs to one set of terminals on a mono amp is different than connecting two subs to two sets of terminals on a mono amp.
And explain what "load" the sub is connected to.

Educate us all.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Oh ffs you're going grammar nazi on this too

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

H

View attachment 41691

How can I bridge that

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

View attachment 41691

That's interesting, Chickenshit. But it doesn't cover his idea of simply connecting two subs to the same set of terminals, and how it would be different from connecting two subs to the separate sets of terminals.

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

H
How can I bridge that

You use just one set of terminals....correct Rob?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

H
How can I bridge that

First, you connect the subs to the load...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You use just one set of terminals....correct Rob?

No no Chickenshit, they're "outputs", remember? Multiple "outputs" on that mono amp. If you wire one sub to each output on that POS HiFonics, it's different from wiring both to just one output.

Ask Spokey9, he'll explain the electrical theory behind it. Some thing really smart, like this:

spokey9 said:
It's OK to only use 1 set...if you use both say a 2ohm load into each output...the amp will see a 1 ohm load...hifonics over rates their output these days...

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You are flat out denying he had classified documents even when he said he had them.
"There is no need to jump to hypotheticals." Your words regarding the list of things recovered in the raid.
You said you will not give any credence to the reports of what was found or released.
"Saying you have something doesn't mean you are guilty of something." is a direct, unedited quote of your own words, posted by you.

So, speak to the response from the NARA to the committee: Was the NARA lying when they said they recovered classified documents from Trump in February 2022?

7. Has the Archivist notified the Attorney General that former President Trump removed presidential records from the White House? If not, why not?
Answer: Because NARA identified classified information in the boxes, NARA staff has been in communication with the Department of Justice.

Show me where I "flat out denied he had classified documents".

 

[YourNameHere 10+ year member]

Nice try, you still look like an idiot

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Do you believe the election was stolen? Yes or no

In my opinion the left committed enough voter fraud to win the election.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Kid he had documents that are classified higher than top secret at his house in his 45 office. Are you ok with that? A President can't just walk into a room and say these documents are declassified. There is a process to getting that done. Trump thinks he is above the law.

I am if you are about the alleged documents.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nice try, you still look like an idiot

Sorry Chickenshit, but you look like a chickenshit for not having any conviction for you own words. Not even the guts to take a mock online bet to back up what you say.
That's pretty fekking pathetic.

As for Spokey9, he's a numbnuts who will flat out DENY he even said something, even when his own quote is posted.
You both run your mouths, and don't have the nutz to back 'em up.
Weak.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Sorry Chickenshit, but you look like a chickenshit for not having any conviction for you own words. Not even the guts to take a mock online bet to back up what you say.
That's pretty fekking pathetic.

As for Spokey9, he's a numbnuts who will flat out DENY he even said something, even when his own quote is posted.
You both run your mouths, and don't have the nutz to back 'em up.
Weak.

I didn't deny anything except your spin