Says the guy who is 100% sure everyone in the US has the same opportunity as everyone else.
We do, that's why we live here.
Wrong. The lost lawsuits prove you are wrong. Citizens are intentionally denied opportunity. They sue. A court decides that they were indeed deprived of opportunity. Your claim is false.
The guy who thinks 99.4% of millions cannot be a whole number.
Not once did I make that claim.
Your "proof" that the news reports of "more than 99% were vaccinated" was a lie:
"How do you vaccinate part of a person? As in there is 1 person he is 99.4% vaccinated. Justify that." You could not understand or believe the statement that the number of people vaccinated could be more than 99%, but less than 100%.
The guy who thinks gender is sex.
Words have more than one meaning and can describe more than one thing. Before you speak, make sure we are talking about the same thing.
You don't get to make up definitions to suit your needs. Gender is not simply penis or [email protected], even though YOU feel that it is.
The guy who thinks you cannot have monoleaf springS.
Never said that either.
You sure did. I specifically pointed out that you can have a box full of individual monoleaf springs, and you argued against it. You also argued against Sloride for having a set of monoleaf springs on a vehicle. You also said the OED and Eastwood Spring got the definition wrong, and that General Motors calls a spring composed of more than one leaf "mono leaf" (which is not only wrong, but you failed to provide any proof of).
The guy who thinks you can’t calculate a percentage of any quantity less than 100.
That was your statement when you were "speaking for me" and trying to insult me.
Nope. I used 90 M&Ms as a sample quantity in discussing percentages and a majority that was less than 50%. You argued that the calculations required 100 M&Ms to figure percentages.
The guy who thinks an average is a number used for nefarious purposes.
It sure can be.
You said "are", not "can be". You also argued that an average does not actually exist (prior to explaining the "nefarious purpose" theory)." "average is only useful for lazy people simplifying numbers or for nefarious means" .
That rape does not happen unless he witnesses it.
Never made that claim either. Man, you are on a roll today.
You said it and I can quote it. Even your compatriots said you were wrong.
"I don't "demand" to see rape. I said if I didn't see it then I cannot convict based on hearsay." Also demonstrating you don't know what "hearsay" means.
The guy who thinks sexual identity is not controlled by the brain.
Again, never made that claim.
Afraid you did. Your words: "The brain is not a factor in sex."
The guy who thinks he is just as much an expert as anyone in any field.
If I have the same knowledge and obtained it the same way, I ask you what makes them an expert and not me. You couldn't figure that question out so you went back to your usual dumb shit.
So you admit your intelligence is so limited that you have to ask if there is a difference between you and say, Charles Darwin? Yeah, you definitely don't know what you don't know. That's a sign of low intelligence.
That sex is ONLY for procreation.
Never made that claim.
Actually, you made it twice, in two different posts. "When it comes to sexual intercourse we are no different than wild animals as it is for the same thing, reproduction." "Sex IS biologically just for reproduction."
And on, and on, and on.
A complete dope trying to suggest others are dumb.
You have listed several of your outright lies... let me guess, you won't back them up with factual proof either will you. Mind you your interpretations are not factual proof.
Feel free to point out which of these quotes of your words is a "lie". Or did you mean that you were lying when you posted all these things?