What to do about Radical Middle Eastern Musli......

Yeah, we should all turn the other check
latest


1081px-Check_mark_23x20_02.svg.png


No thanks
Thanks
 
It'll never get better.

I wish that was all we had to be worried about. The Question is how much worse does it have to get before we realize it takes sacrifice to solve this issue.

The reason we stayed in Germany, Japan, South Korea... is because it takes time (50 years plus in those cases) & requires lots of sacrifice. We have to support the leaders that will stay the course and are prepared to make the hard sacrifices.

We expect to go in a take a territory and then the human cost is over. Guess again. Previous wars our human looses were where in the tens and hundreds of thousands, and once we concord the territory we could expect minimal losses after that. When the war is against a IDEOLOGY and it is everywhere (not just Middle Eastern men) our up front losses won't be much by comparison to previous wars, taking a territory/property is just the beginning.

We have to man up to fight evil. Those who don't fight real evil, make up there own stuff to fight ("Global warming", "institutionalized racism" "inequity against women"... in the USA we have a black president, we have equal pay for equal work... USA is not perfect but those things aren't worthy of 1% of the attention they get. We don't need to make up evil, there is the real thing in front of us.

The war against Jihad deserves much more of our attention and we need to be prepared to make sacrifices to get this in control over it, even if it takes the next 50 years.

 
I wish that was all we had to be worried about. The Question is how much worse does it have to get before we realize it takes sacrifice to solve this issue.
The reason we stayed in Germany, Japan, South Korea... is because it takes time (50 years plus in those cases) & requires lots of sacrifice. We have to support the leaders that will stay the course and are prepared to make the hard sacrifices.

We expect to go in a take a territory and then the human cost is over. Guess again. Previous wars our human looses were where in the tens and hundreds of thousands, and once we concord the territory we could expect minimal losses after that. When the war is against a IDEOLOGY and it is everywhere (not just Middle Eastern men) our up front losses won't be much by comparison to previous wars, taking a territory/property is just the beginning.

We have to man up to fight evil. Those who don't fight real evil, make up there own stuff to fight ("Global warming", "institutionalized racism" "inequity against women"... in the USA we have a black president, we have equal pay for equal work... USA is not perfect but those things aren't worthy of 1% of the attention they get. We don't need to make up evil, there is the real thing in front of us.

The war against Jihad deserves much more of our attention and we need to be prepared to make sacrifices to get this in control over it, even if it takes the next 50 years.
I don't fight for any of those things.

 
I wish that was all we had to be worried about. The Question is how much worse does it have to get before we realize it takes sacrifice to solve this issue.
The reason we stayed in Germany, Japan, South Korea... is because it takes time (50 years plus in those cases) & requires lots of sacrifice. We have to support the leaders that will stay the course and are prepared to make the hard sacrifices.

We expect to go in a take a territory and then the human cost is over. Guess again. Previous wars our human looses were where in the tens and hundreds of thousands, and once we concord the territory we could expect minimal losses after that. When the war is against a IDEOLOGY and it is everywhere (not just Middle Eastern men) our up front losses won't be much by comparison to previous wars, taking a territory/property is just the beginning.

We have to man up to fight evil. Those who don't fight real evil, make up there own stuff to fight ("Global warming", "institutionalized racism" "inequity against women"... in the USA we have a black president, we have equal pay for equal work... USA is not perfect but those things aren't worthy of 1% of the attention they get. We don't need to make up evil, there is the real thing in front of us.

The war against Jihad deserves much more of our attention and we need to be prepared to make sacrifices to get this in control over it, even if it takes the next 50 years.
I don't fight for any of those things.

 
**** that. We had to rebuild Japan. We've already tried that in the middle east.
Heh.. wrong order, perhaps bomb first, then rebuild since rebuild first doesnt work...

Anyways- I have seen somethings posted online and seen several instances of world news that makes interesting points-

Congress doesn't want refugees here and if it gets vetoed, over 2/3 majority will override immediately..

The issue is refugees in the US AND at Instabul airport recently have been detained as actual ISIS members.

Now, if that's not enough, the actual REAL refugees are a problem too. Their life style and culture violate the common culture that we experience in the US in terms of laws. Abusing children, etc..

We do not need that here.

ISIS has claimed there are over 1000 members living in US right now. The problem with this group or religion is the following-

Muslims follow the Koran and in that book is the word Jihad over and over. A documentary I have watched a while back says they do not like to explain that to non muslims because it makes them look bad.

HOWEVER, Their own religion says basically those who do not follow their beliefs shall be executed.

There was a big verbal fight with ben afleck on bill maher show saying Ben was defending muslims saying only the extremists believe in jihad but bill is saying, NO, they ALL are taught it and if they do not believe in these twisted ideas, then they themselves can be victims of execution..

The religion is nuts. This is why it's a thread. They are brainwashing women in the US and recruiting them to join ISIS, it's been happening.

Recently 5 people were arrested at mexican border as being members of ISIS.. That's something new..

The problem is there are estimated 1.5 billion muslims in the world and how their religion is structured, that's 20% of the population a possible threat.

Now, i do not personally believe every muslim is a threat. Common sense or a breath of reality can overcome the bullcrap associated with it.

Religion is the root of all evil.

The biggest problem with terrorism or wars, etc is the lack of education.

But anyways, i have no "ideas" to stop it but strongly advise to not accept the fact that they should be welcomed into our country. We as a SPECIES should be on alert in each of our countries and anyone acting stupid (terrorism) should be dealt with in full force including the originating country they many may still exist. Yes, that means small war but that's what it takes.

And also, about Trump..

I'll just say this-

Trump is probably the best candidate on the republican side they have because of his no-bullcrap arrogance, get the job done attitude.

But what he doesn't have is political sense at all. He has no progressive plans for anything unique. Whenever he's asked to go into detail about anything, it's always he'll get it done.

That sometimes works in business but i can tell you this, You cannot run a country as a business.

It would be interesting to see how the country would be run under Trump but he is not THE choice, imo, out of what to choose from.

Of course voting is opinionated so there is never THE answer to vote for.

I'm mainly interested in Sanders because for the last 20-30 years, he has made so many public speeches and even made part of congress look completely stupid about predicting things that would happen in the future.. then it would happen and the same person involved have to apologize on tv, lol...

But seriously, Sanders does make many good points.

One thing he said recently which was interesting was-

Since Russia frowns upon the US since the 80s as practically THE REASON why ISIS exists in the first place-

We send ~$40 billion per year to Saudi Arabia for military defense. Part of that money get's channel to black market to ISIS eventually.

USA knows it and COULD HAVE changed policies to control it but never did.. EVER. This is why Russia says we funded ISIS, now they are a threat, and instead of US taking care of it, we ask other countries to do it with the excuse of.. well, they are closer..

That may be true but if more and more of our allies get involved in a war with ISIS because of our laziness to stop funding terrorism and then we have to get involved in a mini-world war, you can guarantee some of our larger allies like russia, at any time, will turn around and attack us if it benefits themselves and from an un-biased standpoint, i wouldnt blame them.. then of course bam... world war.

But Sanders said, Send all the **** refugees to Saudi Arabia and let them take em in..

If they refuse, have the US close ALL military funding off until they accept, problem solved.

Look at what we did to Cuba, we cut them off. The only thing they benefited from being cut off was advances in medical research because it was a "fight to survive" country during the last 50yrs there.

Hell, just cut everyone else off for them to get the picture.

But Russia is not playing around.

They had already "drafted 150,000 troops in preparation for World War III" 4 hrs after paris attacks. They contacted NATO and said they are armed for nuclear defense. NATO says you cannot use nukes, violation of UN. They say we know.. but if we are attacked again, we WILL use nuclear defense if necessary.

Few days later, they find out ISIS claimed Russian airliner downing by bomb. THE NEXT DAY, they and france were bombing the hell out of Raqaa.

Then Turkey shoots down Russian fighter due to a communication mishap. Luckily, they didn't retaliate but have now severed all ties with Turkey. They are in warmode and we should be concerned between now and the end of next year before our next president is elected.

 
Heh.. wrong order, perhaps bomb first, then rebuild since rebuild first doesnt work...

Anyways- I have seen somethings posted online and seen several instances of world news that makes interesting points-

Congress doesn't want refugees here and if it gets vetoed, over 2/3 majority will override immediately..

The issue is refugees in the US AND at Instabul airport recently have been detained as actual ISIS members.

Now, if that's not enough, the actual REAL refugees are a problem too. Their life style and culture violate the common culture that we experience in the US in terms of laws. Abusing children, etc..

We do not need that here.

ISIS has claimed there are over 1000 members living in US right now. The problem with this group or religion is the following-

Muslims follow the Koran and in that book is the word Jihad over and over. A documentary I have watched a while back says they do not like to explain that to non muslims because it makes them look bad.

HOWEVER, Their own religion says basically those who do not follow their beliefs shall be executed.

There was a big verbal fight with ben afleck on bill maher show saying Ben was defending muslims saying only the extremists believe in jihad but bill is saying, NO, they ALL are taught it and if they do not believe in these twisted ideas, then they themselves can be victims of execution..

The religion is nuts. This is why it's a thread. They are brainwashing women in the US and recruiting them to join ISIS, it's been happening.

Recently 5 people were arrested at mexican border as being members of ISIS.. That's something new..

The problem is there are estimated 1.5 billion muslims in the world and how their religion is structured, that's 20% of the population a possible threat.

Now, i do not personally believe every muslim is a threat. Common sense or a breath of reality can overcome the bullcrap associated with it.

Religion is the root of all evil.

The biggest problem with terrorism or wars, etc is the lack of education.

But anyways, i have no "ideas" to stop it but strongly advise to not accept the fact that they should be welcomed into our country. We as a SPECIES should be on alert in each of our countries and anyone acting stupid (terrorism) should be dealt with in full force including the originating country they many may still exist. Yes, that means small war but that's what it takes.

And also, about Trump..

I'll just say this-

Trump is probably the best candidate on the republican side they have because of his no-bullcrap arrogance, get the job done attitude.

But what he doesn't have is political sense at all. He has no progressive plans for anything unique. Whenever he's asked to go into detail about anything, it's always he'll get it done.

That sometimes works in business but i can tell you this, You cannot run a country as a business.

It would be interesting to see how the country would be run under Trump but he is not THE choice, imo, out of what to choose from.

Of course voting is opinionated so there is never THE answer to vote for.

I'm mainly interested in Sanders because for the last 20-30 years, he has made so many public speeches and even made part of congress look completely stupid about predicting things that would happen in the future.. then it would happen and the same person involved have to apologize on tv, lol...

But seriously, Sanders does make many good points.

One thing he said recently which was interesting was-

Since Russia frowns upon the US since the 80s as practically THE REASON why ISIS exists in the first place-

We send ~$40 billion per year to Saudi Arabia for military defense. Part of that money get's channel to black market to ISIS eventually.

USA knows it and COULD HAVE changed policies to control it but never did.. EVER. This is why Russia says we funded ISIS, now they are a threat, and instead of US taking care of it, we ask other countries to do it with the excuse of.. well, they are closer..

That may be true but if more and more of our allies get involved in a war with ISIS because of our laziness to stop funding terrorism and then we have to get involved in a mini-world war, you can guarantee some of our larger allies like russia, at any time, will turn around and attack us if it benefits themselves and from an un-biased standpoint, i wouldnt blame them.. then of course bam... world war.

But Sanders said, Send all the **** refugees to Saudi Arabia and let them take em in..

If they refuse, have the US close ALL military funding off until they accept, problem solved.

Look at what we did to Cuba, we cut them off. The only thing they benefited from being cut off was advances in medical research because it was a "fight to survive" country during the last 50yrs there.

Hell, just cut everyone else off for them to get the picture.

But Russia is not playing around.

They had already "drafted 150,000 troops in preparation for World War III" 4 hrs after paris attacks. They contacted NATO and said they are armed for nuclear defense. NATO says you cannot use nukes, violation of UN. They say we know.. but if we are attacked again, we WILL use nuclear defense if necessary.

Few days later, they find out ISIS claimed Russian airliner downing by bomb. THE NEXT DAY, they and france were bombing the hell out of Raqaa.

Then Turkey shoots down Russian fighter due to a communication mishap. Luckily, they didn't retaliate but have now severed all ties with Turkey. They are in warmode and we should be concerned between now and the end of next year before our next president is elected.
That was a good read and raises a lot of excellent points. Like you said, unfortunately there is no definitive answer to the refugee situation that will please everyone. While Russia hasn't been playing around our current potus has been pussyfooting everywhere. It'll be interesting to see what the next one comes into office having to deal with. And a bit scary if I can say so myself.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

 
Heh.. wrong order, perhaps bomb first, then rebuild since rebuild first doesnt work...

Anyways- I have seen somethings posted online and seen several instances of world news that makes interesting points-

Congress doesn't want refugees here and if it gets vetoed, over 2/3 majority will override immediately..

The issue is refugees in the US AND at Instabul airport recently have been detained as actual ISIS members.

Now, if that's not enough, the actual REAL refugees are a problem too. Their life style and culture violate the common culture that we experience in the US in terms of laws. Abusing children, etc..

We do not need that here.

ISIS has claimed there are over 1000 members living in US right now. The problem with this group or religion is the following-

Muslims follow the Koran and in that book is the word Jihad over and over. A documentary I have watched a while back says they do not like to explain that to non muslims because it makes them look bad.

HOWEVER, Their own religion says basically those who do not follow their beliefs shall be executed.

There was a big verbal fight with ben afleck on bill maher show saying Ben was defending muslims saying only the extremists believe in jihad but bill is saying, NO, they ALL are taught it and if they do not believe in these twisted ideas, then they themselves can be victims of execution..

The religion is nuts. This is why it's a thread. They are brainwashing women in the US and recruiting them to join ISIS, it's been happening.

Recently 5 people were arrested at mexican border as being members of ISIS.. That's something new..

The problem is there are estimated 1.5 billion muslims in the world and how their religion is structured, that's 20% of the population a possible threat.

Now, i do not personally believe every muslim is a threat. Common sense or a breath of reality can overcome the bullcrap associated with it.

Religion is the root of all evil.

The biggest problem with terrorism or wars, etc is the lack of education.

But anyways, i have no "ideas" to stop it but strongly advise to not accept the fact that they should be welcomed into our country. We as a SPECIES should be on alert in each of our countries and anyone acting stupid (terrorism) should be dealt with in full force including the originating country they many may still exist. Yes, that means small war but that's what it takes.

And also, about Trump..

I'll just say this-

Trump is probably the best candidate on the republican side they have because of his no-bullcrap arrogance, get the job done attitude.

But what he doesn't have is political sense at all. He has no progressive plans for anything unique. Whenever he's asked to go into detail about anything, it's always he'll get it done.

That sometimes works in business but i can tell you this, You cannot run a country as a business.

It would be interesting to see how the country would be run under Trump but he is not THE choice, imo, out of what to choose from.

Of course voting is opinionated so there is never THE answer to vote for.

I'm mainly interested in Sanders because for the last 20-30 years, he has made so many public speeches and even made part of congress look completely stupid about predicting things that would happen in the future.. then it would happen and the same person involved have to apologize on tv, lol...

But seriously, Sanders does make many good points.

One thing he said recently which was interesting was-

Since Russia frowns upon the US since the 80s as practically THE REASON why ISIS exists in the first place-

We send ~$40 billion per year to Saudi Arabia for military defense. Part of that money get's channel to black market to ISIS eventually.

USA knows it and COULD HAVE changed policies to control it but never did.. EVER. This is why Russia says we funded ISIS, now they are a threat, and instead of US taking care of it, we ask other countries to do it with the excuse of.. well, they are closer..

That may be true but if more and more of our allies get involved in a war with ISIS because of our laziness to stop funding terrorism and then we have to get involved in a mini-world war, you can guarantee some of our larger allies like russia, at any time, will turn around and attack us if it benefits themselves and from an un-biased standpoint, i wouldnt blame them.. then of course bam... world war.

But Sanders said, Send all the **** refugees to Saudi Arabia and let them take em in..

If they refuse, have the US close ALL military funding off until they accept, problem solved.

Look at what we did to Cuba, we cut them off. The only thing they benefited from being cut off was advances in medical research because it was a "fight to survive" country during the last 50yrs there.

Hell, just cut everyone else off for them to get the picture.

But Russia is not playing around.

They had already "drafted 150,000 troops in preparation for World War III" 4 hrs after paris attacks. They contacted NATO and said they are armed for nuclear defense. NATO says you cannot use nukes, violation of UN. They say we know.. but if we are attacked again, we WILL use nuclear defense if necessary.

Few days later, they find out ISIS claimed Russian airliner downing by bomb. THE NEXT DAY, they and france were bombing the hell out of Raqaa.

Then Turkey shoots down Russian fighter due to a communication mishap. Luckily, they didn't retaliate but have now severed all ties with Turkey. They are in warmode and we should be concerned between now and the end of next year before our next president is elected.
I agree with most of what you said, but I'm not voting for Bernie Sanders.

Although, I do predict he is going to win the next election by popular vote

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

azmcrae

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
azmcrae
Joined
Location
Scottsdale, Az
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
70
Views
3,538
Last reply date
Last reply from
Rmsanger
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top