What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love how the left created "anti-vaxxers" with the goal of division. Answer me this Jimi77, RobGMN. When a person knows that it takes years, even decades to create a viable vaccine to defeat a virus and suddenly there are 3 vaccines being pushed on the people that 1 of 2 things is true. The people pushing the vaccines knew of the threat and had a viable vaccine ready to go OR the people pushing them knew they are experimental at best? When the people know it's the later that does not make them anti-vaxxers it makes them smart and aware.
 
Last edited:
I love how the left created "anti-vaxxers" with the goal of division. Answer me this Jimi77, RobGMN. When a person knows that it takes years, even decades to create a viable vaccine to defeat a virus and suddenly there are 3 vaccines being pushed on the people that 1 of 2 things is true. The people pushing the vaccines knew of the threat and had a viable vaccine ready to go OR the people pushing them knew they are experimental at best? When the people know it's the later that does not make them anti-vaxxers it makes them smart and aware.
I don’t get why not trusting rushed “medicine” with very little safety testing makes people an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist…it’s probably because the people who made the shots heavily fund most news outlets that most people read. Do people not realize good old fashion corruption when they see it?

 
Last edited:
And yet you trust people who have no facts, evidence, professional training, or education.

You reference “smoking gun” articles with headlines similar to “They’re hiding the fact that the vaccine is useless”, when the body of the article very clearly states the author has no proof of such.

Literally billions of vaccines administered, and you are still pushing the narrative that it will kill us all.

At what point are you going to realize how ridiculous you sound?
The massive reduction in Covid deaths is due exclusively to natural immunity, the "experimental" vax never worked and the CDC data to the contrary is just fake data. If only "they" would work in such a seamless and absolutely organized manner when it comes to other global issues we face, we could have paradise here on earth. Makes you wonder what our reptilian overlords are up to.

According to Alex Jones the same nano particles (in the vaccine) that are going to start killing all of us in 2 years are being put in the food supply. So if we're all going to die in 2 years anyway (unless we have our home grown food supply) why avoid the vax? As we know, Alex Jones tells the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth - after all he is a devoted Christian.
 
I don’t get why not trusting rushed “medicine” with very little safety testing makes people an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist…it’s probably because the people who made the shots heavily fund most news outlets that most people read. Do people not realize good old fashion corruption when they see it?


I thought Fox was crushing "the other guys" in ratings. I could be wrong, but I seem to remember hearing that somewhere.

 
The massive reduction in Covid deaths is due exclusively to natural immunity, the "experimental" vax never worked and the CDC data to the contrary is just fake data. If only "they" would work in such a seamless and absolutely organized manner when it comes to other global issues we face, we could have paradise here on earth. Makes you wonder what our reptilian overlords are up to.

According to Alex Jones the same nano particles (in the vaccine) that are going to start killing all of us in 2 years are being put in the food supply. So if we're all going to die in 2 years anyway (unless we have our home grown food supply) why avoid the vax? As we know, Alex Jones tells the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth - after all he is a devoted Christian.
They are trying to put MRNA into the food supply. That’s not AJ just saying that; that is a plan. They want to skip your informed consent and just vaccinate you through food.
 
Last edited:
I love how the left created "anti-vaxxers" with the goal of division. Answer me this Jimi77, RobGMN. When a person knows that it takes years, even decades to create a viable vaccine to defeat a virus and suddenly there are 3 vaccines being pushed on the people that 1 of 2 things is true. The people pushing the vaccines knew of the threat and had a viable vaccine ready to go OR the people pushing them knew they are experimental at best? When the people know it's the later that does not make them anti-vaxxers it makes them smart and aware.
It might make them smart and aware. But when that same group is touting experimental use of other drugs (or disinfectants) one is left to think that a massive segment of that group isn't that smart or aware. When that same group of people cite VAERS, side effects, etc without proper context (when that context is abundantly available), then one might conclude that they have agenda and is about making me "smarter and more aware."
 
It might make them smart and aware. But when that same group is touting experimental use of other drugs (or disinfectants) one is left to think that a massive segment of that group isn't that smart or aware. When that same group of people cite VAERS, side effects, etc without proper context (when that context is abundantly available), then one might conclude that they have agenda and is about making me "smarter and more aware."
That whole reply just sounds like a bunch of nothingness. Who then gives us proper context?
 
Last edited:
They are trying to put MRNA into the food supply. That’s not AJ just saying that; that is a plan.
According the always honest and well informed Alex Jones, it was already happening. He also guaranteed I'd be dead in 2 years after taking the Vax - he had giant stacks of paperwork all over his desk to prove it. Currently I'm about 2 weeks overdue to die, but I'm sure it's not an exact science.
 
It might make them smart and aware. But when that same group is touting experimental use of other drugs (or disinfectants) one is left to think that a massive segment of that group isn't that smart or aware. When that same group of people cite VAERS, side effects, etc without proper context (when that context is abundantly available), then one might conclude that they have agenda and is about making me "smarter and more aware."
I have seen NO evidence that this group is massive. All I hear about it is from the left crying out loud and exaggerating.
 
According the always honest and well informed Alex Jones, it was already happening. He also guaranteed I'd be dead in 2 years after taking the Vax - he had giant stacks of paperwork all over his desk to prove it. Currently I'm about 2 weeks overdue to die, but I'm sure it's not an exact science.
Ok? Hope you make it. I don’t think anyone wants anyone to die, besides maybe Bill Gates. Alex Jones is a radio host. Fauci, Trump, Biden, Birx, CEO of Pfizer, etc., are all extremely important and powerful figures that actually run things, and they all over hyped the vaccine without the data to support it. People have died and been injured from the vaccine that they were extremely coerced into taking. Jones isn’t in a position of power, but people who lie a whole lot f*cking more than Jones does are still investing in labs in China and completely misrepresenting the covid jabs’ safety and actual effectiveness. Jones is literally just a radio show host. The actual people in power are those whose actions I’m most concerned with.
 
Last edited:
That whole reply just sounds like a bunch of nothingness. Who then gives us proper context?
It's not nothingness, it's an accurate description of the anti-vax crowd.

Proper context - just supply us with the whole set of facts. You're the one complaining about CDC Director (among others) telling people to get the vax with no mention of the side effect; yet you seem to have no issue with anti-vaxxers talking about the side effects with no mention of the of millions of lives saved or the 100s of millions of people suffering no side effects. Armed with half the facts anybody can twist and distort reality to fit whatever agenda they might have. Armed with half the facts the CDC Director can make it sound like the vax is bullet proof.

Remember when "you guys" were saying the vax was driving the mutations in the protein spike? But now that that mutation has lead to the drastically less deadly omicron variant, why isn't the vax getting credit? (<- rhetorical) Whenever I see double standards like that, I know there is greater single standard behind them. In this case, I highly suspect that many people have an agenda to use pseudo science to make the vaccine look as bad possible. Are you saying I'm wrong?
 
Last edited:
From the Cleveland Clinic:

‘Results. COVID-19 occurred in 1475 (3%) of 48 344 employees during the 100-day study period. The cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was lower in the “not up-to-date” than in the “up-to-date” state. On multivariable analysis, not being “up-to-date” with COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 (HR, 0.77; 95% C.I., 0.69-0.86; P-value, <0.001). Results were very similar when those 65 years and older were only considered “up-to-date” after receiving 2 doses of the bivalent vaccine. Conclusions. Since the XBB lineages became dominant, adults “not up-to-date” by the CDC definition have a lower risk of COVID-19 than those “up-to-date” on COVID-19 vaccination, bringing into question the value of this risk classification definition.’

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
808,186
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top