What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It was done, and done in spades.
You once again failed to support your feelings with facts.
It’s not my feelings. Wtf are you talking about? I asked about what experiences in your real life required vaccine status prior to 2019. You supplied some google searches. I’ve been asked about tetanus boosters in my hospital stays. That’s all I can recall in my life. I suspect your experience is similar, you’re just acting like a 16 year old girl armed with google and Facebook memes knowing that your real life experience destroys your own argument, which is super weird when you think about it.
 
It’s not my feelings. Wtf are you talking about? I asked about what experiences in your real life required vaccine status prior to 2019. You supplied some google searches. I’ve been asked about tetanus boosters in my hospital stays. That’s all I can recall in my life. I suspect your experience is similar, you’re just acting like a 16 year old girl armed with google and Facebook memes knowing that your real life experience destroys your own argument, which is super weird when you think about it.
Knock it off with the "Facebook facts" bullshlt. It honestly makes you look ever more the moron when I post public health law info and you call it "Facebook memes".
Your FEELING was that there is no job in the US that required vaccination prior to COVID. Cool stepped up and proved you wrong with info about both firefighter an EMT jobs that require vaccination. I provided verifiable fact that a large employer (14,000 employees) required MULTIPLE types of vaccines in 2017, which is WELL before COVID hit. I also provided links to LAW requiring vaccination for certain employees. Your hospital stays have NOTHING whatsoever to do with a private employer requiring vaccination of employees prior to COVID.

Here's how you expressed your FEELING that no private employer required vax prior to COVID.
SlugButter CarAudio.com Elite VIP
Yesterday at 6:31 PM #5,455
"Really. Name a job that required vaccine status to work there in 2018 anywhere in America."


If anyone is like a high-schooler when it comes to this discussion, it is you with your inability to support your own feelings/beliefs/opinions with any facts, AND your absolute denial of any facts that are presented to you. Like a child, you think something does not exist if you cover your eyes and don't see it. Talk about "super weird".
its that what happened when you landed in jail? You believed the laws didn't exist or apply to you?
 
Last edited:
I had a feeling those lawmakers were being unethical. Turns out my feelings are supported by facts. We must be at the nexus of the universe.
It's a step in the right direction! Now start using facts to form the opinions instead of hoping the facts will show up, and you've got a one-two punch.
 
Rob has nothing. No point hanging out in this thread any more. What a shocker.
Says the teenage girl who has been proved wrong multiple times but still insists her Facebook memes are the way to support an opinion.
How's the cleaning business doing with 5/7 employees out with a virus that's "nothing more than a cold"?
 
See bullshit like this doesn’t disprove the information they’re talking about. It’s about the information, not the source.

What about this information? Does this information not count?
35304


Oh yeah fact checkers are totally unbiased. I’m sure that’s a fair assessment and wasn’t paid for by competitors to ZH.

 
The Ol' unbiased but biased internet fact check websites....WOW, people really depend on this....but guys thats not true, i have this website here that tells me the truth ....hahahaha, comical they only seem to fact check right wing media/news...but they are unbiased lol
You are literally delusional. There is about an equal amount of right vs left biased sources.

 
So next time i go in front of a judge i can just bring along "google search" show the judge my fact website/search to prove im not guilty and walk out the court room a free man? Its on the internet your honor, it has to be true, right? Yeah, probably wouldnt work out to well
 
Last edited:
So next time i go in front of a judge i can just bring along "google search" show the judge my fact website/search to prove im not guilty and walk out the court room a free man? Its on the internet your honor, it has to be true, right? Yeah, probably wouldnt work out to well

So next time i go in front of a judge i can just bring along "ridiculous conspiracy theory" show the judge my ridiculous conspiracy theory and retarded take to prove im not guilty and walk out the court room a free man? Its on the internet your honor, it has to be true, right? Yeah, probably wouldnt work out to well

Also this analogy is actually retarded. The reason that article was linked in the first place is also retarded. I bet neither @Buck or you actually read it:

Bourla said it would "not be a good scenario" if people were to get boosters every four to five months. "What I'm hoping [is] that we will have a vaccine that you will have to do once a year," he told Channel 12 news on Saturday. Instead, Bourla argued it would be easier to sell the idea and "easier for people to remember" if a vaccine is required only once per year, calling it "an ideal situation" from "a public health perspective."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
809,081
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top