did you see where they have rifles, pistols, and shotguns as umbrella terms to cover all guns.... and also why can't someone who has a class III license be able to legaly own a full auto weapon?Alot of those guns should be banned, no need for a civilian to have any fully automatic weapon IMO.
Yes I saw that they have the terms that include basically all weapons, just saying that there is no need for someone to own something like a Dragunov or Striker or Galil. I understand sport guns like the AR-15's and AK's though.did you see where they have rifles, pistols, and shotguns as umbrella terms to cover all guns.... and also why can't someone who has a class III license be able to legaly own a full auto weapon?
Unless you could somehow reassure that you are a sport gun shooter, I see no need to own any full auto weapons. You dont even see police officers on or off duty with full auto weapons!did you see where they have rifles, pistols, and shotguns as umbrella terms to cover all guns.... and also why can't someone who has a class III license be able to legaly own a full auto weapon?
there is no reason other than fun, that should be the only reason you need.Yes I saw that they have the terms that include basically all weapons, just saying that there is no need for someone to own something like a Dragunov or Striker or Galil. I understand sport guns like the AR-15's and AK's though.