reason why there was no apology was because he said that he didn't kill those people. and hence since he claimed that he has no reason to apologize. why say sorry when he thinks he didn't committ the crime? whether is did or not that i do not know. but just to be consistent, if he claims innonence why say sorry? if he says sorry then he's basically admitting he did the crimes which would just contradict his claim of innocence.I say Good Riddance.
I find it incredibly hard to believe that he was honestly sorry for what he did seeing as he didn't offer any real apology for the things he did prior to being incarcerated....only claims that the man that he once was isn't who he had become.
R.I.Pieces, Loser!
(is it inappropriate to speak ill of the dead or are there exceptions in an extreme case such as this?)
thanks for the announcement. four innocent people died however many years ago, lets remember that. who gives a **** about tookie? i dont.If I was working, I would have taken the day off to get drunk, dance, and make merriment.
I agree, who wouldn't write childrens books to try and get off of death row?Why is this such a big deal... really.
This isn't the first, or the last... or a landmark... he's just one of many, and many more to come.
If you are against the death penalty, this case isn't going to help your argument...