DBfan187
5,000+ posts
Supa's mom was here!
I like to do a little cross dressing on the weekends.
DBfan187
Pl8er
5,000+ posts
Can you solve it?
ha ha ha ha....so your telling me that they covered up EVERYTHING but missed the fact that the flag was waving? I mean they spent all this money covering it up, had countless people looking at it to make it believable and they just overlooked that?!?
You're a moron. I saw on the internet the other day that Bill Gates is giving away millions if you pass on the email, you better go find that!
You're a moron. I saw on the internet the other day that Bill Gates is giving away millions if you pass on the email, you better go find that!
hemi=22s
10+ year member
I Pop Bottles
i wish i could smack him through the web for being so stupid
1. The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt and galactic ambient radiation (see Radiation poisoning). Some hoax theorists have suggested that Starfish Prime (high altitude nuclear testing in 1962) was a failed attempt to disrupt the Van Allen belts.
* The Moon is ten times higher than the Van Allen radiation belts. The spacecraft moved through the belts in just 30 minutes, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the metal hulls of the spacecraft. In addition, the orbital transfer trajectory from the Earth to the Moon through the belts was selected to minimize radiation exposure. Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions. Dosimeters carried by the crews showed they received about the same cumulative dosage as a chest X-ray or about 1 milligray.[58] Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem, which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.[12], pp. 160–162
* The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that thirty-three of the thirty-six Apollo astronauts involved in the nine Apollo missions to leave Earth orbit have early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip.[59] However, only twenty-four astronauts left earth orbit. At least thirty-nine former astronauts have developed cataracts. Thirty-six of those were involved in high-radiation missions such as the Apollo lunar missions
* The Moon is ten times higher than the Van Allen radiation belts. The spacecraft moved through the belts in just 30 minutes, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the metal hulls of the spacecraft. In addition, the orbital transfer trajectory from the Earth to the Moon through the belts was selected to minimize radiation exposure. Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions. Dosimeters carried by the crews showed they received about the same cumulative dosage as a chest X-ray or about 1 milligray.[58] Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem, which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.[12], pp. 160–162
* The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that thirty-three of the thirty-six Apollo astronauts involved in the nine Apollo missions to leave Earth orbit have early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip.[59] However, only twenty-four astronauts left earth orbit. At least thirty-nine former astronauts have developed cataracts. Thirty-six of those were involved in high-radiation missions such as the Apollo lunar missions
5. The flag placed on the surface by the astronauts flapped despite there being no wind on the Moon [67]. Sibrel said "The wind was probably caused by intense air-conditioning used to cool the astronauts in their lightened, un-circulated space suits. The cooling systems in the backpacks would have been removed to lighten the load not designed for Earth’s six times heavier gravity, otherwise they might have fallen over".
* The astronauts were moving the flag into position, causing motion. Since there is no air on the Moon to provide friction, these movements caused a long-lasting undulating movement seen in the flag. There was a rod extending from the top of the flagpole to hold the flag out for proper display (visible under the fabric in many photographs). The fabric's rippled appearance was due to its having been folded during flight and gave it an appearance which could be mistaken for motion in a still photograph. The top supporting rod of the flag was telescopic and the crew of Apollo 11 found they could not fully extend it. Later crews did not fully extend this rod because they liked how it made the flag appear. A viewing of the videotape made during the Moonwalk shows that shortly after the astronauts remove their hands from the flag/flagpole, it stops moving and remains motionless
* The astronauts were moving the flag into position, causing motion. Since there is no air on the Moon to provide friction, these movements caused a long-lasting undulating movement seen in the flag. There was a rod extending from the top of the flagpole to hold the flag out for proper display (visible under the fabric in many photographs). The fabric's rippled appearance was due to its having been folded during flight and gave it an appearance which could be mistaken for motion in a still photograph. The top supporting rod of the flag was telescopic and the crew of Apollo 11 found they could not fully extend it. Later crews did not fully extend this rod because they liked how it made the flag appear. A viewing of the videotape made during the Moonwalk shows that shortly after the astronauts remove their hands from the flag/flagpole, it stops moving and remains motionless
brtnboarder3241
5,000+ posts
Banned
link to the vid?
dragnix
5,000+ posts
LXIX
i was ready to believe u then u linked to wikipedia //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
can't fully trust wiki unfortunately
2002XLT
5,000+ posts
Thats right bishes...
wow, so i guess we dont have a bajillion satellites rotating around the earth giving us cell capabilities either? That must be another cover-up....
iagrdshaka
5,000+ posts
Down with jimmy hats
lawl @ the cover up believers
i watched that special abc or nbc a few years ago that made some interesting points...wasnt like the reflection in one of the guys helmets wrong...i think the sun was in the reflection on the helmet but the sun was like to his back or something.....
being that we were in a rush to beat the russians to everything back then i might believe that it was staged.
being that we were in a rush to beat the russians to everything back then i might believe that it was staged.
hemi=22s
10+ year member
I Pop Bottles
I Doubt U Would Develop Cataracts From That Small Amount Of Radiation Usually Takes 100 Times More And At A Large Concentrated Dose To The Eyes To Cause Catatracts, Pts Receive Radiation Treatment 100 Times Those Levels To A Specified Spot On The Head And It Does Not Cause Them Cataracts,
Also Radiologists And Xray Techs Are In The Room For Radiographic Exams For Many Years 2 Feet From A Radiation Source And Rarely Do U See Someone Get Enough To Cause Cataracts
Also Radiologists And Xray Techs Are In The Room For Radiographic Exams For Many Years 2 Feet From A Radiation Source And Rarely Do U See Someone Get Enough To Cause Cataracts
iagrdshaka
5,000+ posts
Down with jimmy hats
Thank you Dr. hemi=22s.
bds0688
10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif:laugh://content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Similar threads
About this thread
