THE Thread

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

PG had a birth sheet?

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

Hi Mike1 //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
What is new for my homie?

gah my bads.

its all rain here. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/*******.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

PG had a birth sheet?

yes it did. said 937 watts. And the 600.1 said 834 i believe. i cant find that one right now.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

yes it did. said 937 watts. And the 600.1 said 834 i believe. i cant find that one right now.

937 on a multi channel amp? Weird way to measure. So it's 234x4 @ what load? Or was that 468x2 bridged?

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

PG had a birth sheet?

937 on a multi channel amp? Weird way to measure. So it's 234x4 @ what load? Or was that 468x2 bridged?

"total tested power (all channels driven into 4 ohm @ 1% THD):.................937 watts."

I was surprised too that it does that much. I was like //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif but oh well. Its supposed to put out 200x4 from 1-4Ohms so. meh 30 watts extra doesnt seem too far fetched.

When i was checkign them out before, i dont remember anyone saying it did anymore than 200.

 

[azbass 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

Well that should make the Bostons happy //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

No being sad Mike1 //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/nono.gif.eca61d170185779e0921b0faa9704973.gif

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

why is njazzbass sad?

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

And yeah I hope they make the bostons happy. I doubt Im going to be done with all this by saturday. thats for dam sure.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

Not unless you do a mega shitty joRb.

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

Upon further research I found that other peoples' also say 934-937. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/woot.gif.aaa6090e619a97b6090d16dd863c5a69.gif

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

Hmm, kinda looks like a REALLY bad "8". But if other people have 9 then I bet that's what it is.

 

[Chevillac 5,000+ posts]

Hmm, kinda looks like a REALLY bad "8". But if other people have 9 then I bet that's what it is.

Thats what I thought at first, but it would be like they didnt even try to make the bottom loop of the eight. So I said it must be because that person has fucekd up handwriting, the 3 and 7 are ****ed up too. Even if its 837 im still good with that.