Pretty much.Working on his car... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Which means he is sitting in his car doing nothing...
Edited for accuracy //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifWorking on his car... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Which means he is sitting in his car wishing it wasn't the v6 version...
Well, the Marantz was $3,000 new in '01, and the Arcam was $1,200 in '98. A lot of that difference is in build quality. The Marantz just sounds smoother to me. The Arcam probably has better bass definition, but it doesn't have the smooth midrange that the Marantz does.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Bummer... HOw much better is the Marantz than the Arcam?
Are you using it as a transport or not?
Replied.beat, you have PM.