The real way to elbow your ports...

IDSkoT
5,000+ posts

Resonating Reticular
Here's a visual aid for you guys. The elbow part I put down 3.5" (The width of the port) to ease the transition. If you have any questions, ask. The part on the inside of the port is needed for structural integrity. What I would do when cutting the inside port walls, I'd under cut just a bit so there's excess, and sand it all down nice and smooth. The build log will come soon for this box (hopefully.) It's for a member on this forum, he can tune in if he wants.

Box.jpg


 
Yeah, seen it done before, certainly arent the first to do this.
Never said I was. I just see a lot of people throwing in a 45 deg elbow and expecting it to come out fine... and some people just need a visual aid to understand how it's supposed to be done.

 
Hmm. Where did you learn this??

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif;)//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

103_1293.jpg


 
Hmm. Where did you learn this??








//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif;)//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Haha! From the master himself!

Do you make the beginning of the outside angle = to the width of the port? I.E. The beginning of the angle starts 3.5" from the back of the port wall. Would that be a good way of rationalizing where to start the angle from?

 
Never said I was. I just see a lot of people throwing in a 45 deg elbow and expecting it to come out fine... and some people just need a visual aid to understand how it's supposed to be done.
define "come out fine".... i've never used this method and with the success i have had without it, i don't plan on making more 45s to do it the "real way".

show me proof that it makes one bit of difference in performance and i might care...

 
define "come out fine".... i've never used this method and with the success i have had without it, i don't plan on making more 45s to do it the "real way".
show me proof that it makes one bit of difference in performance and i might care...
Measure corner to corner in the elbow of your port. The measurement will be longer than the width of your port. This will mean your tuning is different, as you will have a different port area than you orginally planned for. Sure, it is negelible in most cases. As long as you realize that it does in fact change it.

Edit: Doing it this way (as IDSkoT mentioned) keeps the port the same width, and the tuning stays the way it was planned.

 
hm, come to think of it.... i think IDskot designed a box for me about a year ago for a 18 with interchangeable ports...

his designs did not have this new found method of port design...

i want a refund

 
Unless you are shooting for extra .01 - .03 deebeez, then I dont see it necessary for any 45s at all. but continue on............
Like I said, in most cases it is absolutely negligible, but when someone requests a certain tuning freq, I like to stay as close as possible. Not to mention it looks teh *** //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

I'm not saying my process is any better or worse than anyone else's. By theory, it makes perfect sense.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

IDSkoT

5,000+ posts
Resonating Reticular
Thread starter
IDSkoT
Joined
Location
Miami, Florida
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
88
Views
4,599
Last reply date
Last reply from
Pioneer~Saturn
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top