He is a solid 3rd baseman. He's not a gold glover but he's solid none the less as he doesn't miss many games at all. He has a great work ethic and will most likely be a great leader in the clubhouse. The Dodgers gave up prospects. They may be good but they are just that, UNPROVEN prospects. Oh and did you hear that he can also hit a little bit.He is an average 3rd basemen, who is 34 turning 35, going to be a free agent. The Indians got one of the Dodgers top 5 hitting prospects who is a catcher, plus a solid relief prospect. Good deal for Cleveland.
Well, you can talk stats all day but you can't rate the intangibles.He's a career 265 hitter, with a career 447 slugging percentage and a career 782 OPS. he is average. Too bad Cleveland didn't use your logic when trading Bartolo Colon.
No. My point is that your knowledge of baseball is lower than a white man's vertical. Leadership is an intangible. It's not someone like Manny who can hit the ball but is terrible in the field and causes nothing but trouble. I'm talking about someone who has an impact without being the best player on the team.No, I'm laughing at the fact you believe there is such a thing as "intangibles" if your point was intangibles are BS made up by ESPN to make average players look better then they are, then yes your point was proven.
Manny has two championships and a World Series MVP. I'll take Manny being Manny over Blake's intangibles any day. Apparently his leadership didn't prevent him from playing in 4 world series.No. My point is that your knowledge of baseball is lower than a white man's vertical. Leadership is an intangible. It's not someone like Manny who can hit the ball but is terrible in the field and causes nothing but trouble. I'm talking about someone who has an impact without being the best player on the team.
Again, you've proven my point.Manny has two championships and a World Series MVP. I'll take Manny being Manny over Blake's intangibles any day. Apparently his leadership didn't prevent him from playing in 4 world series.
LMAO, is every reply going to be "proving your point?" How so? is your point that Blake's "intangibles" has no bearing on how a team performs? If so, point proven.Again, you've proven my point.
Wow. You are DENSE.LMAO, is every reply going to be "proving your point?" How so? is your point that Blake's "intangibles" has no bearing on how a team performs? If so, point proven.
Again, a player doesn't have to be the best player on the team to help his team out. Blake's veteran leadership, experience and solid play (a.k.a. intangibles) will help the Dodgers.He is a solid 3rd baseman. He's not a gold glover but he's solid none the less as he doesn't miss many games at all. He has a great work ethic and will most likely be a great leader in the clubhouse. The Dodgers gave up prospects. They may be good but they are just that, UNPROVEN prospects. Oh and did you hear that he can also hit a little bit.