**The MLB Thread**

when you are comparing leadoff hitters that is a big deal. leadoff hitters are suppose to get on base in front of your rbi guys. the point i'm trying to make is how ignorant you are in saying crawford is better then granderson will ever be, which is simply ignorant.
Crawford isn't a leadoff batter //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 
Crawford isn't a leadoff batter //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

wow with those kinda stats he's in the middle of the lineup? well i stand corrected cause tampa must really **** if crawford is batting that low in the lineup

 
wow with those kinda stats he's in the middle of the lineup? well i stand corrected cause tampa must really **** if crawford is batting that low in the lineup
He's the #2 batter. #1 batter's job is to get on base, but ultimately to take pitches as well. The #1 batter always wants to make the batter work and usually is a good 2 strike hitter. The ideal #2 batter is a good contact hitter that can move the runner over.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Slammed

5,000+ posts
Striking Accord
Thread starter
Slammed
Joined
Location
Gotham City, NY
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
10,961
Views
147,366
Last reply date
Last reply from
hornedfrog1985
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top