Slammed
5,000+ posts
Striking Accord
- Thread Starter
- #8,221
I understand what you are sayingRight now, no, but signing him longer term for over 100 million, the Mets will be paying for it at the end. I'd rather pay Cabrera 20 million per for 10 years since he is only 24, and position players are more reliable then pitchers.
but, this was the only way we couldve acquired him
the Mets didnt want to go over 5 years
I dont think he'll be that bad at age 35 in the NL
17-9 3.35 ERA 190 IPs 200 Ks is possible
