The End of the World as we know it?

[Lil Poot 5,000+ posts]

because michael moore will find any reason to bash bush. he loves conspiracies.

which has what to do with 9/11 or wtc 7 again, i missed that part?

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

can you prove that a mild fire dropped that building? no. convenient.
can you poke holes all through the "conspiracy" that wtc 7 (ignoring tower 1 and 2) was brought down by controlled demolition? no. can i poke holes all through the official story? yes. has it been done time and time again? yes.

look up how to demolish a building by explosive ane then tell me that it was possible without anyone knowing. it's ridiculous. do you realize how many people worked and went in and out of the trade center? just look it up. there is no way to wire that building to fall by explosive with noone noticing.

 

[dcole18 5,000+ posts]

lolz.
if this shit happens i can happily say i will be going out with a bang.

or maybe Texas will break away and become its own country.

meh

i would move there //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

which has what to do with 9/11 or wtc 7 again, i missed that part?

it was more of a jab at michael moore's ridiculousness in comparison with this. bowling for columbine and sicko is on this same level.

 

[Grinder1989 5,000+ posts]

dude just shut your ****ing mouth. You want to get everyone pissed off because they don't agree with your dumbass. Shut up and take your bullshit to another thread.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

you guys are trying to get people to believe that our government did this on every floor of the trade center buildings with noone noticing

maybe you can convince everyone that all the people who worked there are also blind.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

dude just shut your ****ing mouth. You want to get everyone pissed off because they don't agree with your dumbass. Shut up and take your bullshit to another thread.

that's all you got? you are gullable. see my above post dip shit.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i'm down with the world union.

 

[phantom240 5,000+ posts]

look up how to demolish a building by explosive ane then tell me that it was possible without anyone knowing. it's ridiculous. do you realize how many people worked and went in and out of the trade center? just look it up. there is no way to wire that building to fall by explosive with noone noticing.

I think it is entirely possible. If it WAS demolished by explosives, then I would imagine the people operating the whole shebang are a hell of a lot smarter than any of us here on the forum. None of us has a clue what can be done without our knowledge.

I just find it hard to believe that a plane, even loaded down with highly flammable fuel and shit, could cause such a perfect implosion of the buildings down to the ground. Very hard to believe, in my honest opinion.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

I think it is entirely possible. If it WAS demolished by explosives, then I would imagine the people operating the whole shebang are a hell of a lot smarter than any of us here on the forum. None of us has a clue what can be done without our knowledge.
I just find it hard to believe that a plane, even loaded down with highly flammable fuel and shit, could cause such a perfect implosion of the buildings down to the ground. Very hard to believe, in my honest opinion.

decent argument. i disagree though. if you've ever seen what it actually takes to cause a building to fall straight down by explosive, you'd find it ridiculous to do it with noone knowing. the fire wouldn't have to be hot enough to actually melt the support beams either, just hot enough to cause them to twist or crumple under all that weight. anyone who's ever worked with steel knows that it bends pretty easily with a little heat.

 

[phantom240 5,000+ posts]

decent argument. i disagree though. if you've ever seen what it actually takes to cause a building to fall straight down by explosive, you'd find it ridiculous to do it with noone knowing. the fire wouldn't have to be hot enough to actually melt the support beams either, just hot enough to cause them to twist or crumple under all that weight. anyone who's ever worked with steel knows that it bends pretty easily with a little heat.

Yes, this is very true, but to fall STRAIGHT down, so perfectly? Come on.

Also, I remember seeing something about the support beams being insulated to some degree. I don't know what insulated it or how much heat it could withstand, but I know the support beams were made to withstand a smaller jet (Boeing 707, iirc?) loaded with fuel... But being that I don't know all the details of the beams and what not, I'm not going to fight tooth and nail over it.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

Yes, this is very true, but to fall STRAIGHT down, so perfectly? Come on.
Also, I remember seeing something about the support beams being insulated to some degree. I don't know what insulated it or how much heat it could withstand, but I know the support beams were made to withstand a smaller jet (Boeing 707, iirc?) loaded with fuel... But being that I don't know all the details of the beams and what not, I'm not going to fight tooth and nail over it.

i read an in depth explanation a year ago. wish i could find it for you. it's much harder to control a building fall with explosions. the jet fuel spread through several floors in seconds and started to degrade the structural integrity of the beams fairly uniformly. when it started to fall, all of them gave out at relatively the same time. same thing would've had to happen with explosions. i'm not saying that explosions couldn't have done it, it just couldn't have been done without many people seeing all the wire and explosives spread throughout the building.

 

[Rattlebrain 10+ year member]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAdUaOdPhe0

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAdUaOdPhe0

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif that is a classic sig. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[kmanian 5,000+ posts]

I usually watch CNN and the news but havent lately but the last few times that I did, all they talked about was bonds lying about drug use and "the war on terror".

CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS are all liberal stations, they are left wing, you will never hear if the majority of the true issues on any of these stations, if Rupert Merdoch (spelling ?) has anything to do with it it will be bias. Not to say that there aren't bias right wing prigrams aslo, but I think if you are going to get one side of the story you should hear the other side. World net daily, conservative talk radio, fox news are some areas that you can get a more balanced idea of the issues. Once you start to hear the other side you will see how the major main stream media is bias towards the left.

Also this is a situation that is not a "lately" thing it has been news for a couple years, the main stream media just has been keeping it under the radar.