konechiwa
10+ year member
Jeepers
cuz gas costs 60.99 a gallon where he lives.i dont get it if he has teh monies to buy his system how does he not have teh monies to come visit yous guys
duh.
cuz gas costs 60.99 a gallon where he lives.i dont get it if he has teh monies to buy his system how does he not have teh monies to come visit yous guys
pic pleasei routinely catch mexicans in my yard with that setup. you should see the one i use to catch rednecks.
He said it already, he is broke, are you deaf?i dont get it if he has teh monies to buy his system how does he not have teh monies to come visit yous guys
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifI'm so glad I started buying guns. Now I don't think I'll ever stop. I'm going to order the DVD and see what this is all about. If it's anything like the Loose change videos were, I'll prepare for the worse. And to those that are saying we are paranoid watch too much of the bullshit lies the media feeds you. I haven't sat down and watched t.v for over 2 years.
UN = Glorified debating society.you would have to move somewhere there is no UN jurisdiction...
What! They can use superduper sanctions to make other countries angry.UN = Glorified debating society.
This thread went downhill =[. and i just finished the video too.
I saw loose change about 2 years ago, and believed every word it said as truth. It took me about 6 months to realize that it's not too hard to make a video or book for either side, if you can take out information, or manipulate it however you wish.
Now I just watch everything and don't take it as truth, but just as a what if. I don't know if the government did 9/11 or not. What I do know, is that the official "truth," is not that. Some things of loose change and that video are a little hard to grasp and far out, such as wtc 1 and 2. The pentagon and wtc 7 is completely different though and those are convincing. What is really convincing, go on youtube and type "loose change vs" Theres people that came out with a book opposing loose change, and the main guys both debate. The scary part is, when you watch them. The people on the government's side have no rebuttle for what loose change's side says. They either change the subject or are at a loss for words, and they are the ones that know. That is what convinced me, not loose change itself.
The whole one world concept is scary, I don't know if it's true. But at least now everyone that watches it is hopefully a little prepared for what could happen.
I know exactly what your saying, I just couldn't remember the specifics because i watched it a couple months ago. I just mean that, it didn't make sense to me that they couldn't debate some points back, no matter what it is. If it is the official story and "truth," shouldn't it be the easier side to debate? Shouldn't they be poking holes through loose change? I would have liked to see them ask the loose change guys questions that they couldn't answer. That would have been good.You Know i decided to watch this video, and I'm not completely done, however, They do have rebuttals. But I would say that they can't answer many of the questions.
The one guy wearing the black shirt for the loose change team is an *******.
If only they would have hired faulkton....
In part 5....so they say that the plane hit, but explosives were planted (they show videos of small explosions after the plane hit) that made it a controlled demolition, and the rebuttal (from popular mechanics) is that it's false because the conspiracy theories always claim it is an explosion. They list off, a few, including holocaust disbelievers and the black shirted guy just goes nuts.
I'd have to say that their were many points that popular mechanics won, but they really didn't answer a lot of the questions that loose change presented. They were dodgy, most of the rebuttals said that conspiracy theories are always like this, they always go way over there heads, blah blah blah. But they really didn't provide a huge ammount of evidence. Their main rebuttal was "we talked to experts so your wrong".
Good thing I am not diabetic.You will see the CHIP. It is now being marketed to diabetics. It llooks just like the R F I D, is placed in the ARM and monitors blood. Sometimes breaking the ice is the hardest part..