2Tone has been pwned so many times its not even funny. Also to Parker G, they are the same baskets and motors, the softparts are slightly changed but overall the subs are identical.
yay for someone else agreeing.
but ill post this again for people who don't go to the page before.
Your a ****ing retard! The subs are far from exactly the same as the ones TC Sounds offered. I'd like to see you go down for being a moron and spreading lies. Go kill yourself and do the world a favor.
Lets look at it in a more logical sense then since you cant seem to process anything reasonable.
Audiopulse was around when TC was still considered to be in business, and since they were on their way out into bankruptcy chances are they didnt have alot of money.
Now if they did have to make new drivers, or claim improvements over the TC drivers for use at Audiopulse, that would mean that the motors would have to be redesigned and remachined.
Since all of their work is obviously not done on site, and machining and building of parts is contracted to other companies, that means that they need capitol to put up to have these parts redesigned and machined.
Considering they were entering bankruptcy it is highly unlikely that they were able to afford the costs of redesigning the motors and having them machined and tested.
Here's the question however, what's an inexpensive way to change drivers around that can benefit them while still being cost effective?
Changing the soft parts.
Simple way to change around the specs of the subwoofer, while still being able to utilize the same old motors but possibly gaining performance at a reasonably small cost.
And comparing the T/S specs, the changes between the TC drivers and the Audiopulse drivers, is minimal at best, and is just an obvious change of soft parts that could have been instituted on any of the old TC motors.
Now thats a logical argument to show that the drivers are as close to identical as they could be, where's yours to show that they're different?
