saddam sentenced to death what do you guys think?

They should make that man suffer. A hanging is semi-quick i think they should cut off his fingers and toes, thenhis arms and legs, then burn his *** or let some bald eagles eat his ***. something cruel like that would be suffice.

 
Because the people that arent staying in line are the ones we where tyring to get rid of.
I find it really funny some people beleive the liberal media BS that everyone over there is in constant riot mode because we are there.

Did you all forget how happy everyone was when they pulled down the statue of him?
I'm far from Liberal friend. Any real thinking person can see that this stupid war was just a vendetta W had because of his father. Our guys are over there dying for nothing. We're no safer now than we were on 9/10, 9/11, 9/12 an so on.

We "warn" people with real threats, and topple others who "supposedly" had threats to us.

 
That is like saying Hitler kept the Jews in line. Of course he was a bad guy.
Here's an idea...We, the US, mind our own ****ing business and stay out of other peoples affairs. Let the Muslims kill the Jews, let the Jews kill the Muslims, ect. I don't see how out holier than thou, out way or the highway tactics are gonne bring any change or resolution to 1000+ year old conflict.

I will stay out of this thread now. I didn't mean to take it in this direction. Sorry to the OP.

 
he was a bad man, who did bad things to his people; however, he did have the country in check. Now its in chaos, with more bad men fighting over who gets to do more bad things. So even more people are getting killt. What was it we really accomplished?

 
I'm far from Liberal friend. Any real thinking person can see that this stupid war was just a vendetta W had because of his father. Our guys are over there dying for nothing. We're no safer now than we were on 9/10, 9/11, 9/12 an so on.
We "warn" people with real threats, and topple others who "supposedly" had threats to us.
Any real thinking person would unserstand why he needed to be taken out of power.

It was omited from being widely reported that they had ALL of the materials to make long range nuclear warheads except the plutonium and ignition devices. Which are easily and quickly disposed of before we get there. Especially when we give them 48hrs notice we are going.

Muslums vs Jews isnt the case. It's radical muslums vs radical jews, the muslums being the main instegators. They dont just hate jews. They hate everyone who isnt their religion and beleive they will receive 74 virgins if they commit ******* while killing others.

The Muslum Jew Conflict is just the largest because the Jews are a short drive from them. If Vadicant city was right by the dessert there would be just as much tension....because there are radical christians.

The average muslum or jew over there do not want to kill each other. Seddam was simply looking to further his power and was feeding into the radical muslum attacks.

I'm not denying that this could have been handled better, and we should keep our nose out of others business untill it starts to affect us. But it is too late and if we pull out now it will end up being a lot worse than it is now. Either way we removed a powerful radical leader and that is NEVER a bad thing.

If we kept our nose in our own business all the time we would have only enialated japan and there would possibly be no jews left to be fighting with muslums....or anyone who wasnt of anglo-saxan decent for that matter. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 
Now its in chaos, with more bad men fighting over who gets to do more bad things. So even more people are getting killt. What was it we really accomplished?
Says who? People carry on every day life all the time there. It is NOT in constant riot mode. There are small sections where batle ensues...the rest of the country it is carrying on like before...only with liberation from a radical leader.

 
i still disagree with trying to force democracy at gun point down the throats of others, especially when we cant even provide health-care to all of our citizens or keep from cutting student aid.

If he was really a threat, we would have just toppled his regime during the first gulf war, and replaced him with some equally oppressive and brutal dictatorship. That certainly would have been better than trying to organize their country into a working and functional democracy; democracy is something your society has to want and fight for, not something you force upon others because you think you know how they should live better than they do.

 
Says who? People carry on every day life all the time there. It is NOT in constant riot mode. There are small sections where batle ensues...the rest of the country it is carrying on like before...only with liberation from a radical leader.

ok yeah, its all peachy and keen. I know if you replaced Iraq with USA in the headlines for the nightly news id think our country was doing totally awesome.

 
he was a bad man, who did bad things to his people; however, he did have the country in check.
He kept his country "in check" because he killed, tortured or imprisioned those who opposed him.

Is the country, and the world, overall a better place without him in charge of Iraq?

Absolutely.

Should we have went over there in the first place?

Doesn't matter much anymore....we're there now //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

denalilvr

10+ year member
just laugh
Thread starter
denalilvr
Joined
Location
illinois
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
64
Views
1,101
Last reply date
Last reply from
denalilvr
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top