that is fine, it's simply an opinion.I disagree with j31 here, but in this instance, I would chose the memphis.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
I'm not saying it uses better components than other Memphis amps. The memphis does more power, simple as that, worth the extra money.I doubt there is enough power difference to be audible. Better components?? That is doubtful also. They use the same components as any other Memphis amp. I think they are both great amps but I see no reason to spend more on a Memphis amp.
x2I doubt there is enough power difference to be audible. Better components?? That is doubtful also. They use the same components as any other Memphis amp. I think they are both great amps but I see no reason to spend more on a Memphis amp.
if you have the money, go memphis. if you're tryna save cash, hit up the RF.well I can't say much here but if the rf is cheaper and the subs and comps match the rms then why not save so money?? R.F and memphis bell are grate SOILD amps.
L.O.L why would you use a 5 channel amp on the METER??But I can hear the difference between 800 & 1100 watts. So can the meter. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif