Revolution!

Prove? No its called I think most people are idiots on the subject and I try to correct them.Its completely different. The little I do know I try to pass along..

I clearly understand the laws and yes there are out of context but NOONE HAS EVER provided information that elevoloution IS a law. And its pretty clear that even the human geno follows the same basic principals as the other physics of life.

You don't get natural change in gene without an external source. WE HAVE PROVED THIS FOR MANY YEARS. Through cloning and through genetic mutations from external sources.

Your talking about protein intake, that wont change the life of the human gene. Its something the body naturally uses and needs. Even then without making direct genetic changes to the DNA you wont change the human GENO. Not even over time.

Everything we eat Is things naturally needed by the boy. I can't possible imagine eating hamburgers will turn you into a alien. KMSLROF you know how studied that logic sounds?

BTW I love to argue and **** with you guys.. Sometimes its fun until yall get silly.lol

No disrespect but IM not reading your whole post but the carbon dating is a sheer fact as the actually difference in the carbon on earth for over 1 million years surly wont be linear. The earth goes though many cycles with 100,000 years. We experience something similar everyday in the weather. hell 100,000 year ago the earth crust wasn't the same..
You're saying that nothing could happen to cause a mutation in any species genome? Well everyone must be **** gullible to get a new flu shot since obviously the flu hasn't evolved to be resistant to medicine? I was pointing out that no organism is a closed system, but I guess I should have done a better job getting at my point.... It is subject to radiation and other forms of energy...oh wait you must be saying that skin cancer is part of our genetic makeup?!?

As far as carbon dating you don't think they normalize with say...samples taken from arctic ice cores....? Which is it, is carbon dating useless past thousands of years ago or millions of years ago? You're an intelligent guy. Start reading some credible material and quit spouting off some crap from about.org or yahoo answers...

As far as giants if you prescribe to the old testament it could be argued that angels mated with human females to create the Nephalim not necessarily created by some specific fallen angel.... I don't actively keep track of archeological finds, so I have no idea if they found Giant humanoids or not. Of course maybe they were engineers and Ridly scott was onto something with Prometheus #alienswereamongus .

 
i called bullshit on that like 2 days ago and im tring to eexplain that. you dont just create new LIFE(on order). something created all life. take for example bactiera. we cannot prove tha bactiera acttualy evolved into any new life form. the only changes have been based on enviroment.its all specilation and by the fundementals that are law that govermenorn nearly every other aspect of life say enegery cannot be created or destroied just altered. creating new life from one life form just doesnt happen. the laws of physics are against evolution.
Lol dude just quit. You have no clue about what the laws of Physics say. Every one of your posts in this thread attests to the fact.

 
You're saying that nothing could happen to cause a mutation in any species genome? Well everyone must be **** gullible to get a new flu shot since obviously the flu hasn't evolved to be resistant to medicine? I was pointing out that no organism is a closed system, but I guess I should have done a better job getting at my point.... It is subject to radiation and other forms of energy...oh wait you must be saying that skin cancer is part of our genetic makeup?!?
Im talking about radioactive soil/water and the ecosystem. Its well know that the US dumped a lot of radioactive material and it affected the population. Do I have to find and cite this too? Eventually it causes genetic mutations to the local population. The oldest living things on earth haven't changed much. Matter fact "scientist predict" jell fish have been in the oceans for a very long time with very little changes. clearly you havent read my post. the very fundenemtals that seperat humans and rat/apes have a different encoding so to speak. in order to alter that you need to genitically modify that. its not something that occurs naturally.

they cannot prove apes have been on earth any longer than humans have. hell they dont even know how long we have been here...

As far as carbon dating you don't think they normalize with say...samples taken from arctic ice cores....? Which is it, is carbon dating useless past thousands of years ago or millions of years ago? You're an intelligent guy. Start reading some credible material and quit spouting off some crap from about.org or yahoo answers...
ive seen many programs ON the discovery channel admitting they cannot accuratly past a few thousand to 10 thousand years. they previously though it was accurate but they are finding less and less accuracy. Ive done a ton of reasearch and i have a cousin that works and the Smithsonian Museum in DC. shes pretty fimilar with things of this matter. last time i talked to her she said its basicallly a "edgucated guess".. at least when if comes to how long humans been here.
just for reference her name is michelle touchet. Im sure you can find her on the offical site. i dont care to look.

look around, the accuracy of carbon dating is a reallly debatable subject. matter fact they dont really use carbon dating.. lol

http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals/neanderthal-mitochondrial-dna draw your own conculsions. if you think you came from a ape be my guest.

As far as giants if you prescribe to the old testament it could be argued that angels mated with human females to create the Nephalim not necessarily created by some specific fallen angel.... I don't actively keep track of archeological finds, so I have no idea if they found Giant humanoids or not. Of course maybe they were engineers and Ridly scott was onto something with Prometheus #alienswereamongus .
This has come up for a long time. many people have tried to cover up our past and present. like the fact we are the only life present in the universe. if you do your research you wil see.
im done arguing this matter becasue there really is NO proof on the matter. we mihg as well argure the authenticity of the bible.

lets just say i refuse to believe evloution as far as a LIFE changing process. just as you dont believe in hte bible..

 
and your a fool if you believe that we come from apes.
ea30f3690fc8c22baf78d94a3df8212b.jpg


wew lad...

 
For GOD so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, and whosoever beleiveth in Him, shall not perish, but have everlasting life.

I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life, no man gets to the Father except through Me.

Greater gift have no man, but to lay down his life for his brother.

Love yee one another, as I myself have loved you.

That's it in a nutshell.

 
You show me proof. the site I linked is renowned for its studies and the link between monkeys and humans is highly doubted.. 

---------- Post added at 02:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:05 PM ----------

 

I know your not that's y I mocked you in my post.. kmsl

I would you would kill yourself laughing already. KMSL kindest regards

 
cient DNA has been retrieved and analyzed from Egyptian mummies and from animals such as quaggas, mammoths, moas and marsupial wolves. The first analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from Neanderthals was published in 1997.

The specimen was taken from the first Neanderthal fossil discovered, from Feldhofer Cave, in the Neander Valley, Germany. A small sample of bone was ground up to extract mtDNA.

The Neanderthal mtDNA sequences were substantially different from modern human mtDNA (Krings et al. 1997, 1999). Researchers compared the Neanderthal to modern human and chimpanzee sequences. Most human sequences differ from each other by on average 8.0 substitutions, while the human and chimpanzee sequences differ by about 55.0 substitutions. The Neanderthal and modern human sequences differed by approximately 27.2 substitutions. Using this mtDNA information, the last common ancestor of Neanderthals and modern humans dates to approximately 550,000 to 690,000 years ago, which is about four times older than the modern human mtDNA pool. This is consistent with the idea that Neanderthals did not contribute substantially to modern human genome.

A second mtDNA sequence, announced in 2000, was derived from a 29,000 year old Neanderthal found in Mezmaiskaya Cave, Russia (Ovchinnikov et al. 2000). Although the Mezmaiskaya Cave sequence was slightly different than the Feldhofer Neanderthal, the two Neanderthal mtDNA sequences were distinct from those of modern humans. These results confirmed the earlier findings that showed that Neanderthals were unlikely to have contributed to the modern human genome. As with the previous study of Neanderthal mtDNA, results were consistent with separation between the Neanderthal and modern human gene pools or with very low amounts of gene flow between the two groups.

Further mtDNA sequences confirme

quoted fro. the Smithsonian website.

 
You're saying that nothing could happen to cause a mutation in any species genome? Well everyone must be **** gullible to get a new flu shot since obviously the flu hasn't evolved to be resistant to medicine?
I don't think you understand how an immunization works....

We have caused and are causing the continuing strength and diversity of the flu virus by the thing that temporarily protects us.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

™Caveman

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
™Caveman
Joined
Location
SoCal
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
253
Views
7,403
Last reply date
Last reply from
™Caveman
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top