Wrong.
The point he was making is 100% correct. There are measurable, objective parameters that can be compared. It is NOT purely subjective whether sub A is better in terms of distortion/linearity/etc than sub B.
Personal sound preference or "is it worth the price" is subjective.
But most aspects of performance are not.
That's exactly what I trying to say. Personal sound preference is the subjective part.
But there are concrete parameters that you can compare different subs in that will show a clear cut difference, in areas of performance, materials, and build quailty. This is where the majority of price difference comes from. Notice I said majority.
The patented stuff is not "blah, blah" or a thing to laugh at. It takes guys with 40 lbs craniums and research and develpment to come up with some of the stuff that companies like Kicker (the square sub) and JL (the W-cone, DMA optimaization, etc) have that
ACTUALLY WORK AND MAKE A DIFFERENCE in the performance of the speaker. It cost money and time to develop that. and time =money. Then it costs money to get the patenet and then maintain the patent. You pay for that when you get those type of products.
If you're a person that doesn't give a hoot about any of that and wants something that's gonna play your music and "sound" good to you...then yeah perhaps some of the name brands out there are not for you.
If you're a person that is into the nuts and bolts so to speak and engineering behind their products then some of "main stream" brands are for you.
I'll use drag racing as an example (I used to work at Chassis engineering in South Fla building drag cars for some years before I joined the AF).
Customer A will come in and have a $500 chassis he picked up in a bone yard. He wants the bare minumum to make the car rigid and hook up on the track. We give him that, then he goes home and builds his own motor from parts he grabed at swap meets. He throws some juice on it and he's running 10's in th 1/4 for a total price tage of under $10,000
Customer B wants a product he knows he can beat the shyt out of and is performing at the top of the mountain in terms of performance. He buys a $20,000 Pat Musi motor with full roller valvetrain, CNC machined ported heads, the whle mash. Then he puts it in a $15,000 tube chassis with a fiber glass body. Car looks slick, its the latest thing out there. GOes out and runs 10's or maybe 9's.
A second faster than the other car, but that other car could get there still without matching the budget the other guy did. Is Customer B stupid? No. He paid for the technology and engineering, and for the comfort that he's working with some of the best designed and engineered stuff out there. If that doesn't matter to you...then go the other route. Nothing wrong with it.