OMG this is badddassss

[Jason Sizemore 10+ year member]

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4516812904&category=6236&sspagename=WDVW

 

[ieatdrt 10+ year member]

Lmao...z06...rofl

 

[chevy6998 10+ year member]

I don't believe it. 0-60 isn't accurate.1/4 mile isn't accurate and neither is skid pad.

WELL IF ITS NOT ACCURATE WHY ARE ALL OF THE ONLY (25) MODELS BEING MADE SOLD!!! CHECK THE DUPONT REGISTRY YOULL FIND ALOT OF CARS CLOSE TO THIS BUT NO THIS GOOD. LOOK AT THE WEIGHT OF THE CAR AND THEN ON THE BEST Z RATED TIRES (LOOK AT THE TOTAL FRICTION COEFFIECENT) THE MATH ALONE GARUANTEES AT LEAST A .93 G SKID PAD, PLUS WHEN YOU INVEST OVER 35 MILLION IN A PRODUCITON CAR PROJECT WITH FERRARI AND AUDIS EARS LISTENING YOUR WAY YOU DONT GLOAT YOU JUST TELL THE FACTS!!!!!

 

[RCwhat 10+ year member]

WELL IF ITS NOT ACCURATE WHY ARE ALL OF THE ONLY (25) MODELS BEING MADE SOLD!!! CHECK THE DUPONT REGISTRY YOULL FIND ALOT OF CARS CLOSE TO THIS BUT NO THIS GOOD. LOOK AT THE WEIGHT OF THE CAR AND THEN ON THE BEST Z RATED TIRES (LOOK AT THE TOTAL FRICTION COEFFIECENT) THE MATH ALONE GARUANTEES AT LEAST A .93 G SKID PAD, PLUS WHEN YOU INVEST OVER 35 MILLION IN A PRODUCITON CAR PROJECT WITH FERRARI AND AUDIS EARS LISTENING YOUR WAY YOU DONT GLOAT YOU JUST TELL THE FACTS!!!!!

dude, they even state that the testing was done with a gtech....anyone who has used one knows how optimistic their readings are.

 

[RCwhat 10+ year member]

so i guess 400 supercharged hp w/420ft lbs of torque come on the stock mustang?http://www.mustangheaven.com/stangspecs/saleen/2005_a.htm

too bad the one you linked to is a s281sc (sc = supercharged)

the one that this post is originally about is just a regular s281 (= no supercharger = no 400hp.)

 

[dbhittin 5,000+ posts]

a new stock gt puts out 300bhp... the 04 mustang gt does 260bhp..either way there 14 sec cars and are slow

 

[brandontw 10+ year member]

i want a dodge ram srt-10

 

[bonesninja 5,000+ posts]

a new stock gt puts out 300bhp... the 04 mustang gt does 260bhp..either way there 14 sec cars and are slow

well since i only drive to the grocery store and to work i doubt i matters whats under the hood----the saleen looks bad as hell and thats my ***king opinion.

 

[brandontw 10+ year member]

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4517766860&category=31831

same price, alot more unique, and alot more horsepower

or you could get a used one for ghetto cheap.

a-like-so:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=4517109380&category=31831

 

[BiaBia 10+ year member]

That last 300zx is horrid. My 300zx looks much nicer //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

BTW, I want this truck

http://www.1320video.com/vids/racing9.4.04.wmv

 

[joshpoints 10+ year member]

WELL IF ITS NOT ACCURATE WHY ARE ALL OF THE ONLY (25) MODELS BEING MADE SOLD!!! CHECK THE DUPONT REGISTRY YOULL FIND ALOT OF CARS CLOSE TO THIS BUT NO THIS GOOD. LOOK AT THE WEIGHT OF THE CAR AND THEN ON THE BEST Z RATED TIRES (LOOK AT THE TOTAL FRICTION COEFFIECENT) THE MATH ALONE GARUANTEES AT LEAST A .93 G SKID PAD, PLUS WHEN YOU INVEST OVER 35 MILLION IN A PRODUCITON CAR PROJECT WITH FERRARI AND AUDIS EARS LISTENING YOUR WAY YOU DONT GLOAT YOU JUST TELL THE FACTS!!!!!

So you actually believe that it goes 0-60 in 2. something seconds? Not a chance.

Those stats are saying it broke 1 G. I just can't accept that as fact at the time. Maybe after more testing I'll believe it.

 

[mrray13 10+ year member]

dude, they even state that the testing was done with a gtech....anyone who has used one knows how optimistic their readings are.

really? why do most major car magazines use them?

i have one..and it's pretty **** close to the local strip..

and the new gtechs are even better...

oh well..

i like playing with mine...

wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif

 

[Nikuk 5,000+ posts]

really? why do most major car magazines use them?
i have one..and it's pretty **** close to the local strip..

and the new gtechs are even better...

oh well..

i like playing with mine...

wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif

Interesting... I've always wondered how accurate those are.

 

[mrray13 10+ year member]

Interesting... I've always wondered how accurate those are.

they are picky..

to be accurate, u have to be on pretty level ground and have it level as well....

but we've compared it to several other things....(using an 86 buick turbo t type)

at the strip, he's done low 12's in the 1/4...the gtech showed an average of 12.40 @ 114mph (IIRC about the mph) (he does the 1/8th in 8.10@ 90mph..IIRC)

he's 0-60 acording to the gtech is a real low 5...

according to his scan tech thingy..he should have about 265hp at the wheels...gtech showed 255

we haven't done braking or lateral g's..so i can't comment...

but so far, it's been real close to what the car has done at the strip and according to his scan tech thingy (it reads everything from boost, fuel/air ratio, retard to mph)

wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif

 

[HeatSeeker 10+ year member]

Jesus, unless youre on the ****ing race track I doubt it matters if it's a 10sec 14sec or whatever. It's still faster than most of the things out there, and looks hella nice too.