New FourWheeler/ atv suggestions(pics)

[scottiej 10+ year member]

I do agree 120 is a bit off, but they are much faster then 70mph stock. Mine has been clocked doing over 90mph, but its not stock. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

this is SixthFloorFreak

http://www.dunereview.com/bansheepics.htm

found this after searching...he says 74mph stock and 82 with the Toomeys. i'm still gonna have to disagree with you, they aren't much faster than mid to low 70's stock from what i've seen...not that that's slow by any means. I will however allow for the possibility of power loss due to elevation...could put him at 80mph, but it would be hard to say. put on a set of pipes and port the cylinders, and hold on though //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

I love banshees and all, but they are just so d*mn ugly. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/sick.gif.b1847c8dabbfeeddbcf1a78052249e10.gif

They are fast as hell though.

 

[SixthFloorFreak 10+ year member]

the Fullbore plastic makes the Banshee look awesome IMO, but stock they kinda fugly

 

[Johnny Drama 5,000+ posts]

Its real dirty since its cold here.

Fugly yes.....but fast as heLL.

 

[_MstANg_ 10+ year member]

i think they look ok, but i just prefer 4 stroke over 2.

but then again tommyk, a blaster is only 250cc.

 

[tommyk90 5,000+ posts]

i think they look ok, but i just prefer 4 stroke over 2.
but then again tommyk, a blaster is only 250cc.

True, but they also weigh less. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[MasterBlast 10+ year member]

Um to let you know a blaster is actualy only has 196cc but they say 200cc not 250 to set this all straight.

 

[_MstANg_ 10+ year member]

oh ok, i wasnt positivie but i knew it was somewhere around 250. I guess in my ind i was comparing them a little to a 250ex.