lol @ the idiots thinking f bodys and fox's can handle

[tukn18s 10+ year member]

An 87 442 is NOT a classic muscle....
A 69 SS Chevelle is.

hence the reason I stated that it wasnt quite a classic, its the only thing id been in while it raced and lost. My dads car are classics, but no longer stock, so I couldnt compare those, sorry. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/*******.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif

 

[CaliforniabOY5 10+ year member]

An 87 442 is NOT a classic muscle....
A 69 SS Chevelle is.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/word.gif.64b12e39f936af3b4fff38a1c0bd0244.gif

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

They are good for cruising and picking up chicks, racing is not one of them... Something about 35 year old suspension parts I just don't feel comfortable with for racing our Chevelle.

i know //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

and maro suspensions haven't really changed since the iroc days.... wont catch me in one of those past 120.

 

[Diesel_29 10+ year member]

ahaha

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

^^Laughing at your lack of intelligence...

I told you in the other thread...I EVEN LAID IT OUT FOR YOU...nice, simple steps explaining you should've read the two lines past that, yet here you are again making yourself look like a ****in idiot. But FYI, DON'T KNOCK IT TIL YOU TRY IT. Obviously you have never driven one before, from what I can tell...or you would correct some of the dumbass remarks you made. Just for everybody else's reference, I said T/A's can handle better than any in it's class...said it three times as a matter of fact...which obviously this illiterate dumbass didn't read.

Point is, F-Body's weren't built for handling, and they never are going to be.

 

[ballstothewall 10+ year member]

i know //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif
and maro suspensions haven't really changed since the iroc days.... wont catch me in one of those past 120.

I don't go past 120 in anything...

 

[Blove1991 10+ year member]

no traction though //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

**** true with new tires it still spins easily with the 4.3 but if I ever upgraded it would definately be tubbed out

 

[CaliforniabOY5 10+ year member]

I don't go past 120 in anything...

. . . what are you? a girl?

 

[2000Gator 10+ year member]

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2471282 that was my 94....too bad i crashed it haha

 

[ballstothewall 10+ year member]

. . . what are you? a girl?

No, I'm a farm kid that dosen't have access to vehicles that I feel safe in going past 120. I'm not a complete f'ing idiot and I've seen what happens at those kind of speeds. I've done 120 in an '89 S-10, that was stupid, not going to do that again.

I have done 130+ in a 02 T/A on a roadtrip before, I prefer to get up to speed fast rather than having a high speed.

 

[mannyb18b]

. . . what are you? a girl?

Didn't you have a ghey *** v6 Maro? I know a couple girls that drive those

 

[dkmesa 10+ year member]

poor handling machines...that's for sure

 

[CaliforniabOY5 10+ year member]

Didn't you have a ghey *** v6 Maro? I know a couple girls that drive those

*tsk tsk tsk* Preston, handle your *****h!

 

[Diesel_29 10+ year member]

Ohh yeah...this is directed to Eugenics...

If you read the other thread you would have seen my experience with one of those S2K things.

If you SERIOUSLY think a S2000 can even DARE hang with a F-Body or Stang....then you just might be a little retarted. That '03 Cobra in that race was stock at the time btw, idk about the S2K, but I could tell was definetly not a stock engine.

But as far as handling goes, how many times in an american race are you going to need handling? Even if by some chance you raced on the highway, minimal handling is going to be needed. Going by that theory, F-Body's will own any rice burner you might come up with....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/suave.gif.858fc102f7646e678ee8af7e1fbc41d1.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif :laugh: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif :laugh: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[ballstothewall 10+ year member]

Not desktop racing again....

 

[mannyb18b]

*tsk tsk tsk* Preston, handle your *****h!

That square is my *****, he just can't admit it.

Ohh yeah...this is directed to Eugenics...
If you read the other thread you would have seen my experience with one of those S2K things.

If you SERIOUSLY think a S2000 can even DARE hang with a F-Body or Stang....then you just might be a little retarted. That '03 Cobra in that race was stock at the time btw, idk about the S2K, but I could tell was definetly not a stock engine.

But as far as handling goes, how many times in an american race are you going to need handling? Even if by some chance you raced on the highway, minimal handling is going to be needed. Going by that theory, F-Body's will own any rice burner you might come up with....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/suave.gif.858fc102f7646e678ee8af7e1fbc41d1.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif :laugh: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif :laugh: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

What is your def. of a rice burner? Either way...I grew up with both F-body lovers and import lovers. I have respect for both...but you are wrong if you think F-body's "own any rice".

I can't tell you how many 302's and modded strokers I have seen smoked by 4 cylinders and 6 cylinders.

Especially boosted inline 6's.

Both have their place. Gas mileage is a nice plus on one side though....