- Thread Starter
- #331
The facts are right there in front of him. He asks for experience and wheel time, i give it to him and then he sites that oh.... i just dont understand the difference. Like i had never thought to push them to their limits. The proof of the solid rear axles inferiority is in the market today. It's extinct in performance cars. Really the only 'sports' car holding onto it is the mustang... and thats a joke, it has been for some time now.Eugenics, is the source of all this internet fury pure boredom? Or do you actually believe you will change the minds of those who read this?
It's not that he's wrong that keeps me responding to him. Its that in spite of the facts, the general consensus of the racing world, and the automotive industry's constant move for better technology and meaningful advancements... he wont admit it. He has the gall to not only deny any facts or ideas that even the industry itself has implied, but then harp about how anyone who doesn't believe the f body's are great handlers is just some twit with no experience that only reads magazines and molests goats and so on and so forth. Like his narrow band of experience is somehow absolute and infoulable. A Vehicle won x amount of races in the x association's x race. Well no, the driver won. And there are plenty of other factors besides the vehicle itself.
I dont even know why chevrolet even bothered with the corvette... I mean, they obviously had it right with the camaro, they should've just left it in the 70's. The camaro is a supercar slaying machine.
