i can honestly say i have never seen a picture of a woman ******* off a dog
never been to mexico, eh?i can honestly say i have never seen a picture of a woman ******* off a dog
I meant ****..Not the specfic content. Also did it truly harm u in any way shape or form? U saw a nasty picture for less than 3 seconds. R u that upset that people need to be retarded internet bullies and get phat banned..Hence why people need to grow and up ****ing realize and this is the INTERNET...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifi can honestly say i have never seen a picture of a woman ******* off a dog
That's a weak argument, unfortunately. Free Speech is guaranteed by the US Constitution, specifically within the Bill Of Rights but you still cannot yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater for shits and giggles under penalty of law.The people complaining that i was posted. Do they really have no life that they can spend hours upon end complaining that **** was posted. They are acting like they have nvr seen it before. As for the banning of Phat, thats ****ing rediculous. There goes free speech on this forum. His version of making a point, a protest and he gets banned..retarded. People that are complaing need to STFU
DONKEY SHOW!!!!!! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gifnever been to mexico, eh?
I do agree with that point, but IMO this is his version of a protest. He can do so in any way shape or form aslong as he isnt hurting neone. As for PhatTonyDeNARCO, i dont think any have use for a snitch. Makes me feel like im in elementry school again //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifThat's a weak argument, unfortunately. Free Speech is guaranteed by the US Constitution, specifically within the Bill Of Rights but you still cannot yell "Fire!" in a crowded theater for shits and giggles under penalty of law.
Phat knew he was blatantly violating the TOS when he did what he did and he has taken responsibility for it. I believe his motivations were in the right place but his methodology pushed Goob into a corner wherein he really had no choice but to take the action that he did.
Having said that...do I believe that Phat should be the only casualty? Absolutely not. Do I think PhatTonyDeNARCO is some kind of hero? Again, absolutely not. I have exactly zero use for a snitch ~ especially when said snitch was every bit as involved in the fracas as those who have been sanctioned for their efforts.
Not trying to start nething with you, but didnt u go on and on and on about how phat should be banned..isnt that starting drama? I no its your opinion and i respect that, but your last qoute IMO is some what hipocritcal.Prowler573 I know you're a intellegent individual. So I'll respect your opinion and leave it at that.
People are taking this way to serious IMO. It's pretty cut and dry is it not. No need for any drama.
i dont agree with what phat did, i do agree with his reasoning to do so, however what he did was totally unnessesary. it personally did not bother me, but im sure half of the guys on here have kids and would rather not have them walk in on them while they browsing the forum and theres a big female dick across the screen. just because it is the INTERNET does not mean you should act retarted because you can. i dont stick my wang in your pole vent, so dont post dog **** on the car audio forum.I meant ****..Not the specfic content. Also did it truly harm u in any way shape or form? U saw a nasty picture for less than 3 seconds. R u that upset that people need to be retarded internet bullies and get phat banned..Hence why people need to grow and up ****ing realize and this is the INTERNET...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif