I said from the beginning that I felt we had no 'legal' right to invade, and Bush was doing this for alternative motives.. LWW (and his mindless minions) insisted it was based on our 'reliable' US intelligence that KNEW where Chem/Bio weaps were..
Wrong. I said that we had legal right from the 1991 cease fire. We also had authorization from UN Res 1441. If you wish to disagree Savant that is your right. If you wish to make statements contrary to my point that is called deception. I did however say that our sources were evidence of WMD’s.
WE KNOW there are people there that DIRECTLY SUPPORTED bin Laden financially.. yet, no confict, just attacks on the next biggest oil reserve in the world (which migh turn out to be the biggest).. Hmm..
Well the only evidence you have presented of Iraq having the world’s largest supply was a site claiming that we went into Afghanland as a move to take over the mideast and had nothing to do with terrorism or Bin Laden. Using 2 false arguments in direct conflict to make your point? Hmm..
Here is a clue for you.. American's have been lied to for DECADES by our government.. I noticed you had NOTHING to offer in response to the doctored photos and fabricated story by Bush
That’s because I have no evidence that they exist. Show them and your evidence of their falsehood and I will comment.
Misleading. Much evidence being tested.
No facilities to make chem weaps found.
Misleading. Facilities found including one camouflaged, sanitized, and guarded. Others where Iraqis report they were told in advance of inspections. Also chem weapons training schools.
Misleading. See chem weapons.
No WMD (forgiving NON-MOVABLE OIL RIGS) found, mostlikely on a global community considered NUKES..
Misleading. By UN definiton WMD’s include Scud missiles (fired), Al-Samoud missiles (denied, found, tested, confirmed, and fired), aerosol dispersion artillery shells, aerosol dispersion warheads, and nukes. A definition you agreed with until other things were proven.
Iraqi people want us to LEAVE (sure, liberated, but not happy about us being there)
False. SOME want us to leave. A few morons get the news. Throngs chanting “thank you thank you Mr Bush” get ignored.
So, in the light of $20 Billion given to oil, gas, coal companies
To develop energy sources that would not be economicly viable until resources are further depleted…a good thing for the US.
and now not needing Saudi Ariba (our #1 supplier of oil),
OK let me get this straight. 2 things we both think are good happened but since Bush did it you still think it’s bad? Hmm..
what are the odds that I was totally wrong?
Well let’s see. You have posted:
01-It would have been wrong to go after Hitler peremptively.
02-WMD development doesn’t count until they use it.
03-A link stating that the Afghan war was all about mideast oil and had nothing to do with terrorism or Bin Laden..
04-Saddam was complying.
05-Saddam was trying to help.
06-Just because Saddam lied on keeping 18 prior UN resolutions was no reason to not believe him now.
07-America, it’s govt, and it’s citizens ****.
08-That if something’s range can exceed it’s range without conflict to logic.
09-That if missile B is a long range version of missile B it is no longer the same thing.
10-A desire to know men in the Biblical sense.
Odds of 100% are pretty accurate in my opinion.
oh, and someone cried about the sanctions on Iraq.. guess who is ready to tell the UN that all sanctions are lifted since Saddam is out of power? the US.. Hmm..
Awhile back you said this was to keep prices high…yet they fell. A MOMENT AGO YOUE WERE AGAINST THE GOVT HELPING US DEVELOP OUR OWN ENERGY SOURCES. Now we shouldn’t let anyone else develop their’s. Perhaps we could live in caves. Wait the Taliban did that already.
so the oil can flow now. Hmm.. and we want to fase out the Oil for Food program.. Hmm..
The oil for food program was so Iraq could buy needed essentials. Instead the funds were used for palaces and arms. The oil for food program was a limit. If limits are ended then yes this one would be to. Was their a point in there?
you are correct sir, not about oil at all
You already pointed that out and I agree. After all since Dubya made his big money in baseball with the Texas Rangers this is obviously about Iraqi shortstops.
stop being so condescending, please.
Nswartley he doesn't know how. All Savant knows how to do is doubleshuffle and toss out innuendo and then belittle people. America is a great nation. He is a small person. To compensate he bangs on the greatest nation on Earth knowing that we don't have a police state and the constitution will protect him. He defiles the name of Lady Liberty yet sucks at her teats of prosperity and freedom safe in the knowledge that our great system of govt allows this to a degree unrivaled in this world. Somehow in this he thinks he enlarges himself.
PEACE
