What's the point of talking science with someone who doesn't even know the definition of the word theory!?!funny i don't hear anything... theories can be, and offen are, wrong...the fact is there is not a shred! of evidence you can provide from evolution that isn't discredible...
try me, i dare you...
it's easy to throw the evo book at me and say DISPROVE THAT!! because to do so i'd have to write a book, but just try me with some of the reasons YOU believe in evolution
logic... forget the bible, logic alone tells me there must be a creator and intelligent design, my faith determins my religion....By the way, just out of curiosity, what EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE do you have for creationism?
Hmm?
actually with 8 years in university studying zoology yes i can prove it and there is so much evidence involved that generally bible thumpers just throw up their hands in disgust and ignore it because it is so irrefutible they have a sense of defeat....LOL NO YOU CAN NOT PROVE EVOLUTION... you really can't even provide evidence
actually colour can be proven as well since it is part of a spectrum of light..... there is no way that it can be anything else to anyone else as it is a set number..... nice try though keep the bullshit coming troll.......logic... forget the bible, logic alone tells me there must be a creator and intelligent design, my faith determins my religion....
a scientist can tell you the sky is purple and from a certain perspective that might seem true, but to you it's not
exactly i say offer proof or even an example, you call me an idiot and leave...What's the point of talking science with someone who doesn't even know the definition of the word theory!?!
Plus your answer can always be "NO YOU'RE WRONG ITS BECAUSE JESUS IS MAGIC I CAN FEEL HIM INSIDE OF ME FILLING ME UP WITH HOT LOVE".
**** that. Been there done that a million times on the internet and I've already broken my promise to punch out of this thread. Have a godful day sir.
that doesn't support evolution one bit...actually with 8 years in university studying zoology yes i can prove it and there is so much evidence involved that generally bible thumpers just throw up their hands in disgust and ignore it because it is so irrefutible they have a sense of defeat....
here's a little tidbit...... ever wonder why a human ***** looks like an amphibian at one stage and a rabbit in another before it becomes human looking????
now throw me a piece from that prehistoric rag you people call a bible so i can shoot that down now....
yes it does....that doesn't support evolution one bit...
that says that a human baby looks like what you picture evolution to be during its developmental stages...
so you are saying babys don't grow they evolve?
and a baby is really a de-evolved form of human?