i want sound quality

[THATpurpleKUSH 5,000+ posts]

Obsidian for SQ? Really? Isnt it a SPL woofer with decent sound? I figured ude recommend true SQ woofers.

The low inductance and fairly low fs will enable it to work well in sq suited applications.

And as rabbit mentioned, sq is subjective and install dependent.

 

[JoshC 10+ year member]

The low inductance and fairly low fs will enable it to work well in sq suited applications.
And as rabbit mentioned, sq is subjective and install dependent.

herm, interesting. Guess ill see here in a few days when mines done.

 

[wenn_du_weinst 10+ year member]

jesus christ you guys have no clue what a good sq sub is. It's not ''subjective'' that is a huge excuse that people use for running equipment they like so they can classify it as sq. The biggest problem the OP will have is the 1ohm load, not a lot of real sq subs will wire down.

 

[THATpurpleKUSH 5,000+ posts]

IMO- SQ is totally subjective and listener dependent because different people have different amounts of listening experience and every application and listening environment is different so setup A might sound great to person1 and setup B might sound terrible to person 1 but person 2 thinks set up A is bad and B is good. Its how you get people winning sq shows with Kicker L7s in the substage.

 

[Kangaroux 5,000+ posts]

jesus christ you guys have no clue what a good sq sub is. It's not ''subjective'' that is a huge excuse that people use for running equipment they like so they can classify it as sq. The biggest problem the OP will have is the 1ohm load, not a lot of real sq subs will wire down.

Sound quality is most definitely subjective. Everyone likes a different sound out of their install. For example, some people prefer tweeters that are more on the harsh side, which is why there are aluminum tweeters

 

[wenn_du_weinst 10+ year member]

sq = accurate reproduction of the music, not sound good how I like it.

There is a huge difference, just like saying spl or loud.

 

[Kangaroux 5,000+ posts]

sq = accurate reproduction of the music, not sound good how I like it. There is a huge difference, just like saying spl or loud.

So by your standards, if an SQ vehicle has any sort of EQ in it that alters the sound to be anything BUT a flat response, then it isn't an SQ vehicle, because it isn't a 100% accurate reproduction of the music, which is total BS

 

[THATpurpleKUSH 5,000+ posts]

The true answer is that sq is both an accurate reproduction of the signal as well as physical pleasure experienced by the user

Sound quality is the quality of the audio output from various electronic devices. Sound quality can be defined as the degree of accuracy with which a device records or emits the original sound waves. Sound quality is also the physical pleasure or fatigue experienced by a listener.

Sound quality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[TheUnderFighter 10+ year member]

Get 2 sundown SA8s
http://www.caraudio.com/forums/subwoofer-classifieds/534519-f-s-6-sa8-d4-subs.html

Lulz, you say OA isn't SQ, then recommend SA? Nick had power and musicality in mind when designing the OA. I started with the OA though cus I figured he was on a stingy budget, so the OA is the one in his price-range, that can sound good, and take the power. If someone isn't willing to spend over $200, they aren't looking for SQ anyways.

 

[wenn_du_weinst 10+ year member]

So by your standards, if an SQ vehicle has any sort of EQ in it that alters the sound to be anything BUT a flat response, then it isn't an SQ vehicle, because it isn't a 100% accurate reproduction of the music, which is total BS

I think you may be retarded, don't try and twist my words into something they are not. I have put more time and energy into sq then you have this entire hobby. No, anything that doesn't reproduce a flat soundstage with proper imaging is not sq. This entire ''genre'' bullshit is retarded. Sure you can have a great sounding stereo that doesn't make it sq. Hell ask any real home audio guy and he would laugh at anything in a car.

 

---------- Post added at 04:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:35 PM ----------

 

Lulz, you say OA isn't SQ, then recommend SA? Nick had power and musicality in mind when designing the OA. I started with the OA though cus I figured he was on a stingy budget, so the OA is the one in his price-range, that can sound good, and take the power. If someone isn't willing to spend over $200, they aren't looking for SQ anyways.

not true you can get **** good sq for 145 just d4 or s4 only

 

---------- Post added at 04:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:35 PM ----------

 

The true answer is that sq is both an accurate reproduction of the signal as well as physical pleasure experienced by the user


Sound quality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

we all know how fool proof wikipedia is //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif

 

[Kangaroux 5,000+ posts]

]I think you may be retarded' date=' don't try and twist my words into something they are not.[/b'] I have put more time and energy into sq then you have this entire hobby. No, anything that doesn't reproduce a flat soundstage with proper imaging is not sq. This entire ''genre'' bullshit is retarded. Sure you can have a great sounding stereo that doesn't make it sq. Hell ask any real home audio guy and he would laugh at anything in a car. 

---------- Post added at 04:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:35 PM ----------

 

not true you can get **** good sq for 145 just d4 or s4 only

I was just going off what you said, and what you said is if something isn't able to produce an accurate reproduction then it is not SQ. Wouldn't an equalizer set to increase authority in the mids and highs take away from that accurate reproduction?

 

[wenn_du_weinst 10+ year member]

once again you failed to comprehend the entire post. Now is when the same things get said over and over in a gigantic circle.

 

[Kangaroux 5,000+ posts]

sq = accurate reproduction of the music, not sound good how I like it. There is a huge difference, just like saying spl or loud.

An accurate reproduction means not altering the original song in any way so that you are playing it exactly as it was produced (i.e. a FLAT RESPONSE). Doing away with the flat response means taking away from the accurate reproduction, therefore not SQ.

I don't see where I am twisting anything, I'm just taking your logic and applying it

 

[wenn_du_weinst 10+ year member]

you also don't see where I already said that twice, I'm not going to argue about something so stupid. I could care less what sub this guy ends up with.

 

[Kangaroux 5,000+ posts]

you also don't see where I already said that twice, I'm not going to argue about something so stupid. I could care less what sub this guy ends up with.

Mad?