HIGHEST EXCURSION 12" EVER!!! its gotta be atleast 6" p-p!!

[PwnMaster]

ummm no.

I saw t3 m00faz in teh background.

 

[hairrazer 10+ year member]

???//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif

 

[ngsm13 5,000+ posts]

yup. cotjones see's a w1 cone and i think i see kicker for the inner surround. i just didnt think a boston spider couldnt handle that tho. ive seen a mtx 9500 max out and it never compared to that. isnt 9500's suppose to be the highest excursion sub on the market? 4" p-p?. what could of been used for that then? slinkies?? i still say a xmx or parthenon spider was used. (or something close) i spoke to a guy at tc sounds and he told me "a linear 6" excursion from a 12" woofer is physically impossible to achieve. the rippled-wave nomex/woven cotton design has been around for over a strong 70 years or so and still has been proven most reliable. a spider needs to maintain its reliability and not stress and warp by having to stretch so far, and that the diameter of the spider would matter the most. the larger the spider, the more excursion you'll get.(reliably) therefor the design couldnt have been linear" (but it looked pretty linear and controlled to me). it makes since cause the spider would eventually have to get bigger than the mounting hole to do so. the 9500 12"'s spider is like over 10" in diameter to do what it does. so it couldnt be a traditional spider design unless rubber bands were used. and i dont think they were.

You are an idiot.

nG

 

[bumpweLL.nYc 10+ year member]

Id rather have one of these

 

[hairrazer 10+ year member]

Id rather have one of these

i love the pg elites. ive never seen that vid. its a good one thanx.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif

 

[audioinformer 10+ year member]

yup. cotjones see's a w1 cone and i think i see kicker for the inner surround. i just didnt think a boston spider couldnt handle that tho. ive seen a mtx 9500 max out and it never compared to that. isnt 9500's suppose to be the highest excursion sub on the market? 4" p-p?. what could of been used for that then? slinkies?? i still say a xmx or parthenon spider was used. (or something close) i spoke to a guy at tc sounds and he told me "a linear 6" excursion from a 12" woofer is physically impossible to achieve. the rippled-wave nomex/woven cotton design has been around for over a strong 70 years or so and still has been proven most reliable. a spider needs to maintain its reliability and not stress and warp by having to stretch so far, and that the diameter of the spider would matter the most. the larger the spider, the more excursion you'll get.(reliably) therefor the design couldnt have been linear" (but it looked pretty linear and controlled to me). it makes since cause the spider would eventually have to get bigger than the mounting hole to do so. the 9500 12"'s spider is like over 10" in diameter to do what it does. so it couldnt be a traditional spider design unless rubber bands were used. and i dont think they were.

Wow !! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/banghead.gif.8606515f668c74f6de0281deb475b6fd.gifDUMB ***!!

 

[joetama 5,000+ posts]

Id rather have one of these

I would have to say this would be > than the sub to OP posted...

 

[Worlddre 5,000+ posts]

yup. cotjones see's a w1 cone and i think i see kicker for the inner surround. i just didnt think a boston spider couldnt handle that tho. ive seen a mtx 9500 max out and it never compared to that. isnt 9500's suppose to be the highest excursion sub on the market? 4" p-p?. what could of been used for that then? slinkies?? i still say a xmx or parthenon spider was used. (or something close) i spoke to a guy at tc sounds and he told me "a linear 6" excursion from a 12" woofer is physically impossible to achieve. the rippled-wave nomex/woven cotton design has been around for over a strong 70 years or so and still has been proven most reliable. a spider needs to maintain its reliability and not stress and warp by having to stretch so far, and that the diameter of the spider would matter the most. the larger the spider, the more excursion you'll get.(reliably) therefor the design couldnt have been linear" (but it looked pretty linear and controlled to me). it makes since cause the spider would eventually have to get bigger than the mounting hole to do so. the 9500 12"'s spider is like over 10" in diameter to do what it does. so it couldnt be a traditional spider design unless rubber bands were used. and i dont think they were.

holy shit you are impressively stupid

 

[joetama 5,000+ posts]

holy shit you are impressively stupid

Amazing isn't it...

 

[joetama 5,000+ posts]

holy shit you are impressively stupid

Amazing isn't it...

 

[joetama 5,000+ posts]

holy shit you are impressively stupid

Amazing isn't it...

 

[Immacomputer 10+ year member]

I want to double post. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[Immacomputer 10+ year member]

I want to double post. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[Immacomputer 10+ year member]

I want to double post. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

Hooray.

 

[60_cent 10+ year member]

i found this sub on myspace. Does anybody have any information about it?? or what kind of spider was used?? the excursion is SICK!!//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=17136547

what is the name of the second song on the vid...??