TAKE IT BACK. Metallica was never hair band. They never had the sappy love ballad though. Thats part of what made a hair band a hair band. Like Guns'n'Roses.hair bands= kix, cinderella, the original motley crue, faster *****cat, and yes.. the original metallica up until about 91 after the black album was a hair band
Definitions of Hair band on the Web:
Hair metal is a type of heavy metal music that arose in the late 1970s, in the United States, and was a strong force in popular music throughout the 1980s and early 1990s. It is also called glam metal or glam rock. Pejorative terms for hair metal include poodle rock, due to the teased, bushy hair of many performers, or **** rock, due to the frequent fixation on ****** lyrics and deeds.
Just because they had longer hair dont mean that they are considered a hair band. They sounded nothing like the late 80's hair bands. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifNope, no way.. metallica was DEFINATLY not a hair band...
![]()
![]()
Lyrics arnt the only thing that make a hair band a hair band.. excuse me wile i try to find an article out of an interview where they called themselfs the next hair band to hit america in the late 70s...
Kids these days
Agreed. Their new shit sucks out loud. But you cant get any better than their classics. One, Enter Sandman, Call of Ktulu, Estacy of Gold, etc... I could go on foreveri agree they didnt sound much like hair bands, they were alot heavier for sure, but they themselfs called metallica a hair band, hetfield at one time had a sticker on his guitar that supported winger.. one of the biggest and shittiest hair bands made to be, this is going nowhere in any case, who gives a **** if they are or arnt a hair band, they had good music.. HAD