H2 or SX

[Looney_Tune 10+ year member]

1200-1300wrms

3cf @34hz (all i have to work with btw)

Which should get louder...I kno u cant say for sure but let me kno wat u think. I will be getting one of the two in a little bit.

THANKS

Click to read more...

 

[CRXBMPN 5,000+ posts]

an H2 15 would work great in 3 cubes tuned to that, and the wattage is pretty much perfect. Cant say SX but I'm sure the boner-boys who love them will chime in here...

 

[Looney_Tune 10+ year member]

an H2 15 would work great in 3 cubes tuned to that, and the wattage is pretty much perfect. Cant say SX but I'm sure the boner-boys who love them will chime in here...

ok preciate it.

Dont forget to vote BTW...

 

[KnOkIn It 420 10+ year member]

SX that power for sure.

 

[Looney_Tune 10+ year member]

lookin for a good 30 votes. Hopefully its not too close...

 

[Looney_Tune 10+ year member]

btw, I was thinkin SX becuase of the power handling difference...I thought a sub would perform at its best powered properly rather giving a sub alittle more than half its rms...but i guess thats when all the technical things come to play.....which leaves yall. ha

 

[dbhittin 5,000+ posts]

H2's need alot of power to get moving, so SX

 

[Looney_Tune 10+ year member]

H2's need alot of power to get moving, so SX

I was lookin for some kinda advice like this...thanks

Hopefully the SX pleases...ha

 

[lilgator 10+ year member]

The SX is a tried & true proven BEAST of a SQL woofer...

 

[Safe_Cracker 10+ year member]

For the H2 to reach its potential you need 3K but then it gets noisy and sounds funny, they are a power hungry sub. The SX is just a great sub, on that power it will dominate but if you can try to go 3.5-4cf it will sound that much better. BTW I had an SX that I ran two Kicker sx1250's strapped to, sounded awesome! Polo..

 

[iagrdshaka 5,000+ posts]

I vote for the SX, even though I didn't like the sound of my old one.