Yes and you have demonstrated a sufficient and fact rich side of the story //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifaccording to these dipshyts YES!
Sure it is - doesn't mean it is necessarily going to kill us all.Heres the thing, this LHC is real to everyone.....
You have no proof it won't unless you blindly believe the scientist know everything. Splitting atoms seemed harmless enough too //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gifFor them either way they were coming out dead or severly injured I dont believe they should have jumped tho. And that has nothing to do with this, we have no proof this experiment is gonna end the world unlike the people of 9/11 who actually had a plane coming at them or a fire..
Yes and look how many the atomic bomb did kill. Your ******* would have been justified on top of it!Sure it is - doesn't mean it is necessarily going to kill us all.
Lets make a better analogy... say I was an American when they were testing the atomic bomb and I killed myself because I thought it would end the world, was it the scientists fault that I killed myself? The world didn't end.
They have admitted there is a chance, even though they say its .000054370854305834053 or whatever. They really dont know this. They do a bunch of math that most people dont understand to downplay the threat. They still know deep down that this shit could go terribly wrong.Sure it is - doesn't mean it is necessarily going to kill us all.
Lets make a better analogy... say I was an American when they were testing the atomic bomb and I killed myself because I thought it would end the world, was it the scientists fault that I killed myself? The world didn't end.
somebody please set an example and kill yourself and blame it on speedbump. I will pay the lawyer fees for your family and take him to court for murderYes and you have demonstrated a sufficient and fact rich side of the story //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
They didnt know if they were going to get out of that building or not. Not everyone in the building died. Some of those people decided to give up.And you have no proof it will so what's your point? Im saying that in the 9/11 they knew what was gonna happen when those planes hit, but in this case we dont know.
We have good reason to believe just as those jumpers had good reason to believe they were going to die. Nothing is certain until it happens even the death of those jumpers.And you have no proof it will so what's your point? Im saying that in the 9/11 they knew what was gonna happen when those planes hit, but in this case we dont know.
They have admitted there is a chance, even though they say its .000054370854305834053 or whatever. They really dont know this. They do a bunch of math that most people dont understand to downplay the threat. They still know deep down that this shit could go terribly wrong.
Yes, it would be. If you were dead, how did you know the world didnt end?
Like I said before, the people believed there was a reasonable threat to their life. Just like the "jumpers" from 9/11. Thats the analogy/comparison I keep using.
No - it wouldn't be justified.Yes and look how many the atomic bomb did kill. Your ******* would have been justified on top of it!
What is the reason for me to blame? I have not given a threat of harm to anyone. Now if you say because you can't understand the truth I speak and you couldn't continue to go on being an idiot, then I suppose I would be to blame. I have better lawyers though.somebody please set an example and kill yourself and blame it on speedbump. I will pay the lawyer fees for your family and take him to court for murder