Sidebar

Gay Marriage and Trolling

Reply
Jump to latest
Sort by date Sort by reaction score
Ummm.. First off. Who gives a shit what one book says god is? If that is how god is he's a prick anyhow. "You can't get into my heaven because you don't believe in me, IDC that you are a good person, I'm selfish like that."

PSHT! give me a break with that crap, if it wasn't for all those ignorant radicals (Muslim and Christian alike) we wouldn't have so much damn war in this world. I thought religion was supposed to be about piece and acceptance and being a good person. So going around killing people because they don't believe what you believe is pretty counter productive. I pretty much dismiss religion from that point... God, all gods, are murderers. Anyhow, I believe if there is a god, they don't care what you believe, or even that you believe in a god, as long as you are a good person and treat all people with equal respect.

As far as aliens. Yeah, they are out there, and probably even here and we don't know it. Not a big deal, if they cared about us or were threatened, we'd done be dead by now. Not a big deal. And there is likely much more intelligent aliens, and much less intelligent aliens. And there is probably hundreds, thousand, even millions of different species. Not a big deal.

As far as gay marriage goes... Who gives a flying fuck. IDC, leave this country if you have a problem, we'll probably be better without you.

End rant.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ReligionsoftheWorld.jpg
 
its funny how freedom of religion means you get to do whatever that religion, as you interpret it, says you can or should do. how in the phuck does letting gay people marry restrict your freedom of religion anyhow? if you have a job that you cant or wont perform for whatever reason get another job, has nothing to do with religion. can you imagine Muslims whining cause they got fired for not serving pork at the local BBQ hut because they dont approve of pork eaters? same thing...

oh and Buck is right, statistically its near impossible for there not to be tons of other species out there. chances are they are way more advanced than us too. and if that is the case, then I bet its safe to say that they've figured out how to get along w each other without petty prejudices and what not. I bet they decided a long time ago that we were way to uncivilized and savage to be allowed up there. We are like a cancer on this planet, we've most likely been quarantined to this rock until we either kill ourselves or sort ourselves out. I wouldn't want us up there with our collective pettiness if i was them.

 
I dont believe in god nor do i care what anyone does in a closed room.

Kissing publicly does not make others gay so i dont care about that either.

For my own reason i am against the legalization of gay marriage is not because of the gays, but because my son is entering kindergarten this year. I just had a new born daughter whos a month old.

We received letters stating the new teaching they will be having will include an4l s3x between same *** and how to protect from it.

This in my opinion is giving the ok to the non g4y kids to feel its ok to experiment. Living in a society saying everything is ok leads to things that should not be forced will become the standard.

I for one hope my son does not become g4y, but if he does its ok assuming he made the decision himself and not by trying something he learned in school.

Sent from my draconis using Tapatalk

 
the whole argument that a culture that makes homosexuality ok will lead to more ppl being homosexual is premised on the idea that ppl are making a choice to be gay. Now idk about anyone else but I never choose to be straight. Never once was that choice even a thought. i could have been exposed to all the "gay culture" in the world and it wouldn't have meant sh1t to me, cause I'm not gay. I think that the only ppl who think that LBGT's are making a choice must be thinking that cause they are making that choice. and if you're making that choice then I got news for you buddy, your gay. It's cool though, I won't judge you. You just couldn't turn me gay if I wasnt already gay, and if I'm already gay then who the phuck are you to tell me I cant be me? I think they should have the freedom (you that sh1t everyone is always crying about losing?) to be themselves

Now I think there is a whole other question about kids learning about ana1 5ex in school, gay or straight. lets just not conflate the issues.

 
its funny how freedom of religion means you get to do whatever that religion, as you interpret it, says you can or should do. how in the phuck does letting gay people marry restrict your freedom of religion anyhow? if you have a job that you cant or wont perform for whatever reason get another job, has nothing to do with religion. can you imagine Muslims whining cause they got fired for not serving pork at the local BBQ hut because they dont approve of pork eaters? same thing...
oh and Buck is right, statistically its near impossible for there not to be tons of other species out there. chances are they are way more advanced than us too. and if that is the case, then I bet its safe to say that they've figured out how to get along w each other without petty prejudices and what not. I bet they decided a long time ago that we were way to uncivilized and savage to be allowed up there. We are like a cancer on this planet, we've most likely been quarantined to this rock until we either kill ourselves or sort ourselves out. I wouldn't want us up there with our collective pettiness if i was them.
Click to expand...
OP, great troll! ?

As long as that region doesn't interfere with others rights is what makes this country what it is. The Constitution is America. Without it we're nothing. Freedom is critical.

First off your example is really flawed.

1. It would be more like saying Muslim have to work at the pork place and they can't say no!

2. It's not the job that is religious, it's the person that's religious, and while you can leave a job you can't leave yourself.

3. It's not that they won't serve gay married couples. It's that they/we won't help celibate the wedding. There are lots of things I won't help celebrate. I'd even bet money there are are things that even you wouldn't help celebrate. Things is now we can't say no.

So yeah freedom for gays is just as important as anyone else's freedom just not More important than others freedoms. If my religion says I'm not to go to strip clubs, or swinging clubs or gay clubs. should not have the right to say no, that I won't go those kind of clubs? shouldn't you have the right to say no, you won't go into the church like that?

 
the whole argument that a culture that makes homosexuality ok will lead to more ppl being homosexual is premised on the idea that ppl are making a choice to be gay. Now idk about anyone else but I never choose to be straight. Never once was that choice even a thought. i could have been exposed to all the "gay culture" in the world and it wouldn't have meant sh1t to me, cause I'm not gay. I think that the only ppl who think that LBGT's are making a choice must be thinking that cause they are making that choice. and if you're making that choice then I got news for you buddy, your gay. It's cool though, I won't judge you. You just couldn't turn me gay if I wasnt already gay, and if I'm already gay then who the phuck are you to tell me I cant be me? I think they should have the freedom (you that sh1t everyone is always crying about losing?) to be themselves
Now I think there is a whole other question about kids learning about ana1 5ex in school, gay or straight. lets just not conflate the issues.
Click to expand...
The teaching of homosexuality in school is like allowing schools to teach about religion.

Nothing is wrong about it if its a non biased teaching, but with how the world is depending on the teacher it can lead to one or the other being taught and persuaded more into.

Also its not another question, it is cause and effect from allowing gay marriage. The government feels if one thing has become allowed then the other HAS TO BE DONE to make the new law a non biased decision.

Teaching wont make kids g4y, but it can affect kids to being forced into it or will make the g4y kids argue the topics leading to social harassment.

Kids are kids and they do not think like adults. This is my only issue with the law made.

AND YES THIS IS APART OF THE CURRENT QUESTION BY THE OP.

Sent from my draconis using Tapatalk

 
OP, great troll! ?
As long as that region doesn't interfere with others rights is what makes this country what it is. The Constitution is America. Without it we're nothing. Freedom is critical.

First off your example is really flawed.

1. It would be more like saying Muslim have to work at the pork place and they can't say no!

2. It's not the job that is religious, it's the person that's religious, and while you can leave a job you can't leave yourself.

3. It's not that they won't serve gay married couples. It's that they/we won't help celibate the wedding. There are lots of things I won't help celebrate. I'd even bet money there are are things that even you wouldn't help celebrate. Things is now we can't say no.

So yeah freedom for gays is just as important as anyone else's freedom just not More important than others freedoms. If my religion says I'm not to go to strip clubs, or swinging clubs or gay clubs. should not have the right to say no, that I won't go those kind of clubs? shouldn't you have the right to say no, you won't go into the church like that?
Click to expand...
I am kind of on the fence about forcing a business owner to serve ppl they don't want. Because I do see it as a choice they have the freedom to make. I was referring specifically to the op's sited situation. The public servant who won't fulfill her job as a public servant. And if I own a private business and I say that my employees have to serve gay ppl or pork then that's how the cookie crumbles. If you're the owner you have that right as well. Or you should at least. So I still believe the analogy still holds up. A Muslim employee either fulfills the job duties or gtfo while a Muslim business owner should be able to serve whatever and whomever they wish. Same for Christians.

 
I am kind of on the fence about forcing a business owner to serve ppl they don't want. Because I do see it as a choice they have the freedom to make. I was referring specifically to the op's sited situation. The public servant who won't fulfill her job as a public servant. And if I own a private business and I say that my employees have to serve gay ppl or pork then that's how the cookie crumbles. If you're the owner you have that right as well. Or you should at least. So I still believe the analogy still holds up. A Muslim employee either fulfills the job duties or gtfo while a Muslim business owner should be able to serve whatever and whomever they wish. Same for Christians.
Click to expand...
So it's ok to not serve black people at a restaurant if the owner doesn't want to //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

counter-sit-in.jpeg


 
Good catch... That is why I said I was on the fence about it. Cause there is always "that".
Click to expand...
Ok, it's alright to not serve Muslims, gays, Jews, and Christians.

Better serve those black people though. It would be wrong not to //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Previous thread Next thread

About this thread

fatboytyler

fatboytyler

CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
fatboytyler
Joined
Location
Easternl Kentucky
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
41
Views
2,192
Last reply date
Last reply from
adulbrich
Share thread
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list