The underlined sections are for you.
Your first dumb reference - I never made that statement. I ask how do you vaccinate part of a person.
You asked that b/c you did not believe or understand that more than 99% but less than 100% of a large group of people could be vaccinated. You believed (and repeated the belief, maybe multiple times) that the news article said some people were only partially vaccinated. An inability to understand simple math.
If a news article said some people were partially vaccinated that has NOTHING to do with me understanding math.
The news article made no such claim. It referenced a percentage of a very large group of people, called "patients" Notice the "s" at the end of the word, denoting plural. It never said any single person was more than 99% vaccinated. Your failure to understand English and math doesn't change what was in the article.
Your second dumb reference - Again, something I never said or did.
Actually, you did. I used a math example regarding 90 M&M's and percentages. You insisted 10 more were needed to do a calculation of said percentages. Another inability to understand simple math.
I said you forgot 10 M&M's. You lost your mind and the conversation continued.
You said I forgot 10 M&M's because percentages and math in general confuse you. You thought I needed 100 of the candy in my example to be able to discuss percentages. Others pointed out your confusion also, and were humored by it.
Your third dumb reference - I never said all, you said all. You love to add things to what people say.
You made the claim more people in "that group" (the way you describe African Americans) were getting welfare. Except the percentages prove the contrary. 37% is greater than 26%. Another inability to understand simple math.
Your source is biased.
My source is the governing body for the programs that were in question. Please explain your accusations of bias and provide something to back up your accusation. You know: PROOF.
Which goal are you assuming I need to reach? Calling out your inability to read what someone says and not completely phuck up the interpretation, actual meaning, jest, numbers or words?
Your goal of showing how smart I'm NOT. The one you fail at regularly. You're not bright enough to word you posts so that any interpretation is needed. You pretty much say exactly what you are thinking.
Apparently I am succeeding because you can't even tell how ignorant you are and can't tell when I prove it.
You have made blatant errors in your math. You have made blatant errors in your use of grammar and spelling. You have made blatant errors in revealing your homophobia and racism with the words you type here. You have made errors in your assumption of knowledge of federal regulation/laws/statute,. You have made errors in life choices as you can't live on your own and were delivering pizzas during what you consider to be the best economy we've ever had, and continued to do so when you could have made a lot more money with your skills as a "professional driver". Multiple industries were suffering for need of "professional drivers", and still are.
You have not to date offered proof of anything you have said countering my arguments. Remember: Saying the wrong thing multiple times is not "proof", even though YOU fall for that old trick.
Calling out your inability to not argue?
Ironic. You complain about me arguing points of truth, yet you continue to be a part of the argument and insist on posting BS that you can be called out on. Kind of like Buck posting ******* conspiracy theory, then calling others "pot-stirrers" for responding.
Again, just because you say it doesn't make it true. Just because someone else says it, doesn't make is BS.
When i call out BS, I do it by providing facts and evidence that refute the BS. When you can't counter with facts and evidence to SUPPORT your BS, it's quite obviously BS.
Calling out your inability to not gag when you are taking a huge root down your pie hole?
More homophobia. Man, you really are obsessed with homosexuality and homosexual references. Given the ****** proclivities of many homophobes, you may want to speak to a professional. Self-hatred can lead to some genuine long-term problems, and certainly an unhappy existence.
Again, where is my "fear" of you being gay?
Homphobia is not just "fear", as I have already explained to you before. it is "a range of negative attitudes and feelings toward homosexuality or people who are identified or perceived as being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT).It has been defined as contempt, prejudice, aversion, hatred or antipathy, may be based on irrational fear and ignorance, and is also related to religious beliefs". When you try to use homosexual references as an insult, you are showing contempt, prejudice, aversion, hatred or antipathy towards homosexuality. Ergo, you are **********.
Calling out your inability to not be rude and give a guy a reach around?
If you want to be touched by a guy THAT bad, I'd bet a nickel you could just go to the St Marys waterfront and find one. No need to look outside of your little city, much less your state. If you are simply fantasizing and afraid to try, not sure why you keep posting here. Maybe join a forum that caters to such feelings?
Me telling you not to be rude and give your gay lover a reach around does not mean I want or desire to be like you. I have had *** in every hole on a woman I could stuff my junk in and to compare an assshole to a vag I have to say I will take the vag. You can continue to corner the market on bangin hairy man asss and not being polite to them.
My point about your obsession with homosexual behavior is thusly confirmed and reinforced. Why are you even THINKING about male homosexual *** if you are such a stud that every woman craves? I don't like brussels sprouts. I also don't sit around fantasizing about them and making posts about them all day long. You exhibit odd behavior.
I am going to say something here with 100% honesty. Insults and debate/argument/bickering genuinely set aside for the moment:
You're trying really hard to convince anyone reading this thread that you are an intellectual, a great debater, a ladies' man, a real go-getter, a successful winner. The problem is that you step on your own feet with every attempt and leave yourself wide open to be cut off at the knees every time.
Try dialing it back a notch or two. Before you post, put some genuine thought into what you are trying to say or prove, do a little research to see if you are correct, and THEN post that shlt up.
Posting stuff that you assume, feel, believe, or opine without anything to back it up just makes you look bad when it gets turned around on you. I enjoy a good adversarial argument and debate. It would be a lot better if you were being a strong adversary.
