Election 2012

[groundpound4200 5,000+ posts]

That's a dope hat. Link?

lemon party - a game of bingo gone horribly wrong

 

[Sleeklsc 5,000+ posts]

Pot... kettle?

I'm having fun. Seriousness is not present.

 

[groundpound4200 5,000+ posts]

Groundpounder is all sorts of butthurt. Do you always act like a bitch when people disagree with what you have to say?

Nope, just when they spout off useless info and uninformed garbage.

 

[Team Ampere 10+ year member]

No where in your rambling incoherent response did you come close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. We are all dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points and may God have mercy on your soul.

Thank you Sir. I always liked Adam Sandler when i was younger, now i cant stand him and cant watch any of his movies. But u know what i mean, cmon man, if we are going off of his 5 point plan to balance a budget, why doesnt" the math add up"?? At least qwith Obama we know where our money is going, like it or not, . People are going apeshite about his green energy spending. News flash guys, green energy isnt anythingnew and weve been invested in it for awhile now. Where will Romneys budget get us?? He LOVES talking about his beloved state of Massachutets. Has abyone seen teh size of that state?? FUckk, a state and a country are 2 entirely differan things.

I am in the middle, and i approve this message

 

[LBC]

Thank you Sir. I always liked Adam Sandler when i was younger, now i cant stand him and cant watch any of his movies. But u know what i mean, cmon man, if we are going off of his 5 point plan to balance a budget, why doesnt" the math add up"??

It does. What about it are you having trouble with? I will help you do the simple math it takes to see it works out.

At least qwith Obama we know where our money is going, like it or not, . People are going apeshite about his green energy spending. News flash guys, green energy isnt anythingnew and weve been invested in it for awhile now.

It's not green energy investments that are the problem. It is the failures and money laundering. He was giving tax money to solyndra for example, and they were giving him huge campaign donations out of that same money. Also nearly everywhere he invested our tax dollars, it has gone belly up because they never made a product.

Where will Romneys budget get us?? He LOVES talking about his beloved state of Massachutets. Has abyone seen teh size of that state?? FUckk, a state and a country are 2 entirely differan things.

Romney's budget will get us on the path to recovery. Like him or not, it will. We've seen what obama will do, and it's not working. It's simply making things worse. So even if you don't believe in Romney, common sense would tell you that you have to vote for him because he's someone new. The current person has failed. The size of Mass isn't small and the population certainly isn't, but if you want to use that as an example, what had obama managed prior to becoming president? Boom headshot.

I am in the middle, and i approve this message

You're not in the middle.

 

[double 07 10+ year member]

There is no way a sitting president is going to be re-elected with an approval rating below 50%..I don't believe it has ever happened...our current prez is bouncing between 47 to 49%...regardless of party I think he is done......another sign to pay attention to is what states the prez campaigns in....if he is campaigning in a state like Wisconsin that he won by a huge margin in 2008 then his own internal polling is telling him that he is in trouble.....that's why you don't see him or the gop candidate in states that are usually prodominately Red or Blue.......Ohio is now leaning to the gop candidate.....these last few days are going to be interesting for sure....

 

[Team Ampere 10+ year member]

It does. What about it are you having trouble with? I will help you do the simple math it takes to see it works out.
Romney said at the third presidential debate on Monday that his budget plan would bring "a balanced budget within eight to 10 years."

But u are only willing to give Obama 4 years, hmmm theres your simple math. Obama couldnt do it in 4 , but lets give Romney 8-10

It's not green energy investments that are the problem. It is the failures and money laundering. He was giving tax money to solyndra for example, and they were giving him huge campaign donations out of that same money. Also nearly everywhere he invested our tax dollars, it has gone belly up because they never made a product.

Romney's budget will get us on the path to recovery. Like him or not, it will. We've seen what obama will do, and it's not working. It's simply making things worse. So even if you don't believe in Romney, common sense would tell you that you have to vote for him because he's someone new. The current person has failed. The size of Mass isn't small and the population certainly isn't, but if you want to use that as an example, what had obama managed prior to becoming president? Boom headshot.Not in your lifetime

Lead cannot be turned into gold. Two plus two cannot equal five," Summers said. "And 20 percent across-the-board tax cuts cannot be squared with balanced budgets without raising middle-class taxes or eviscerating government."

You may have alot of money, and dont wanna pay more taxes, thats fine, but im not rich, and me paying more taxes wont help the nation. "can u smell what the rock is cookin??

You're not in the middle.

I am in the middle. I just dont like Romney plain and simple. Im all about a fair fight, and none of you have given Obama any credit. Its all good though, cause its gonna be a landslide. Like it or not, it will be a landslide. He may have the most jacked up poilicies of anyone ever, but he will win, and he will win by a landslide.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fro.gif.c695f1f814b01c4ad99fe7f8cccadd29.gif

 

[05fronty 5,000+ posts]

gonna vote tomorrow

 

[xShoWTeKx 10+ year member]

I am in the middle. I just dont like Romney plain and simple. Im all about a fair fight, and none of you have given Obama any credit. Its all good though, cause its gonna be a landslide. Like it or not, it will be a landslide. He may have the most jacked up poilicies of anyone ever, but he will win, and he will win by a landslide.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fro.gif.c695f1f814b01c4ad99fe7f8cccadd29.gif

he hasn't done anything to gain any credit. he hasn't done anything in the middle east the price of damn near everything has doubled in 4 years and hell he still hasn't even proved hes fucking american dude is a joke. not to mention hes a complete socialist.

 

[Team Ampere 10+ year member]

There is no way a sitting president is going to be re-elected with an approval rating below 50%..I don't believe it has ever happened...our current prez is bouncing between 47 to 49%...regardless of party I think he is done......another sign to pay attention to is what states the prez campaigns in....if he is campaigning in a state like Wisconsin that he won by a huge margin in 2008 then his own internal polling is telling him that he is in trouble.....that's why you don't see him or the gop candidate in states that are usually prodominately Red or Blue.......Ohio is now leaning to the gop candidate.....these last few days are going to be interesting for sure....

I agree with every thing you just said. I am not pulling for any one candidate. I am only saying that I think it will be a landslide victory. Even though these polls are put out every other hour or day or whatever. I am looking at a landslide, even if its only on the principle that more people liike Obama. He may not have done anything good for us, but people still have "Change" on their mind. ANd thats what he still presents to the people, change. Romney will have some changes too,

 

[Team Ampere 10+ year member]

It does. What about it are you having trouble with? I will help you do the simple math it takes to see it works out.
It's not green energy investments that are the problem. It is the failures and money laundering. He was giving tax money to solyndra for example, and they were giving him huge campaign donations out of that same money. Also nearly everywhere he invested our tax dollars, it has gone belly up because they never made a product.

Romney's budget will get us on the path to recovery. Like him or not, it will. We've seen what obama will do, and it's not working. It's simply making things worse. So even if you don't believe in Romney, common sense would tell you that you have to vote for him because he's someone new. The current person has failed. The size of Mass isn't small and the population certainly isn't, but if you want to use that as an example, what had obama managed prior to becoming president? Boom headshot.

You're not in the middle.

A number of economists and journalists have said Romney's tax plan doesn't add up.

I guessnoone can add.

 

[LBC]

I am in the middle. I just dont like Romney plain and simple. Im all about a fair fight, and none of you have given Obama any credit. Its all good though, cause its gonna be a landslide. Like it or not, it will be a landslide. He may have the most jacked up poilicies of anyone ever, but he will win, and he will win by a landslide.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fro.gif.c695f1f814b01c4ad99fe7f8cccadd29.gif

Sir, the 8-10 years comment is not one of his 5 points. The deficit when obama came into office was HUGE at 10 trillion. He ballooned it to over 16 trillion and his term isn't up yet. He's not fixing anything. The entire United States economy isn't that large, so you can't just eliminate that in 1 term. What you CAN do is shrink it significantly. obama hasn't done that AT ALL. A budget has not even passed in the senate. How exactly do you balance a budget without a budget? You have no points.

Someone's opinions of tax cuts to budget cuts doesn't make them right. Ask Jack Kennedy about tax cuts. Tax cuts always increase tax revenue because they allow job creators to create more jobs. They allow people to increase spending and increase the number of people earning taxable income. It's the same theory that wal-mart has used to dominate the retail industry. You don't make money on high profit margins. Your high prices result in less net income. You must increase profits with volume of sales. In this case decreasing the prices(taxes) increases the number of taxpayer and tax revenue collected goes up. This has happened every time it has been tried.

Also, your argument for the rich paying more taxes and you paying less demonstrates the illogical mindset of a liberal. Those without much money are mainly consumers. They spend money at or in excess of the rate that they bring it in. They produce nothing other than liability. Those with much money are producers. They receive money at a greater rate than they spend it. They employ the consumers. The more money you take from the producers, the less they can afford to hire for their production. Then you have to take more from them to provide for these unemployed, and the vicious cycle continues. Instead, you must allow the producers to keep more of what they have earned, so they have incentive to keep producing. People don't take out massive loans and lots of risk just to break even or lose money. They do it so that they can turn a profit. When you begin stealing that profit, you see people not taking those risks and you don't get the employees you would have. This is economics 101. liberals don't understand economics.

 

---------- Post added at 01:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 PM ----------

 

A number of economists and journalists have said Romney's tax plan doesn't add up.
I guessnoone can add.

A number have said it could. Since you have cited no specifics, I guess you are just repeating liberal talking points and actually do not know what you are talking about. That seems obvious.

 

[Team Ampere 10+ year member]

Sir, the 8-10 years comment is not one of his 5 points. The deficit when obama came into office was HUGE at 10 trillion. He ballooned it to over 16 trillion and his term isn't up yet. He's not fixing anything. The entire United States economy isn't that large, so you can't just eliminate that in 1 term. What you CAN do is shrink it significantly. obama hasn't done that AT ALL. A budget has not even passed in the senate. How exactly do you balance a budget without a budget? You have no points.
Someone's opinions of tax cuts to budget cuts doesn't make them right. Ask Jack Kennedy about tax cuts. Tax cuts always increase tax revenue because they allow job creators to create more jobs. They allow people to increase spending and increase the number of people earning taxable income. It's the same theory that wal-mart has used to dominate the retail industry. You don't make money on high profit margins. Your high prices result in less net income. You must increase profits with volume of sales. In this case decreasing the prices(taxes) increases the number of taxpayer and tax revenue collected goes up. This has happened every time it has been tried.

Also, your argument for the rich paying more taxes and you paying less demonstrates the illogical mindset of a liberal. Those without much money are mainly consumers. They spend money at or in excess of the rate that they bring it in. They produce nothing other than liability. Those with much money are producers. They receive money at a greater rate than they spend it. They employ the consumers. The more money you take from the producers, the less they can afford to hire for their production. Then you have to take more from them to provide for these unemployed, and the vicious cycle continues. Instead, you must allow the producers to keep more of what they have earned, so they have incentive to keep producing. People don't take out massive loans and lots of risk just to break even or lose money. They do it so that they can turn a profit. When you begin stealing that profit, you see people not taking those risks and you don't get the employees you would have. This is economics 101. liberals don't understand economics.

 

---------- Post added at 01:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 PM ----------

 

A number have said it could. Since you have cited no specifics, I guess you are just repeated liberal talking points and actually do not know what you are talking about. That seems obvious.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/popcorn.gif.32dd9e22fd77e77bc3c907062768fcd2.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/swordfight.gif.e3de6069f3ffe402fc3ab4a827365101.gif

Just remember Landslide. Because your right. Alot of us dont listen to any of that and dont care. We hear that were gonna bring home less money and that in itself is enough to swing left.

Landslide

 

[LBC]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/popcorn.gif.32dd9e22fd77e77bc3c907062768fcd2.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/swordfight.gif.e3de6069f3ffe402fc3ab4a827365101.gifJust remember Landslide. Because your right. Alot of us dont listen to any of that and dont care. We hear that were gonna bring home less money and that in itself is enough to swing left.

Landslide

The point was that you'll be bringing home less money under obama than Romney. Over your head?

 

[Team Ampere 10+ year member]

This is just for people to watch. I dont care who you are pulling for, but i lmfao at the sketchy deal bit.