Eclipse CD-8455 vs CD-8445

Funny, that's like saying it is better because it is.
Like I said in the other thread, all mfgs have gone downhill quality wise in the past few years. Eclipse, Pioneer, Alpine...etc. That is why the older decks are better. Build quality alone makes them higher quality units. I already explained why the 8053 was better thant he 8455 in that other thread. Go read that.

 
Like I said in the other thread, all mfgs have gone downhill quality wise in the past few years. Eclipse, Pioneer, Alpine...etc. That is why the older decks are better. Build quality alone makes them higher quality units. I already explained why the 8053 was better thant he 8455 in that other thread. Go read that.
Only difference is that the 8053 had balanced lines. Nothing else has changed other than the face cosmetics of the deck. Same DAC, same twin DSP chips-same tuning options. I found no SQ differences between my 8443 and my 8455.

 
Only difference is that the 8053 had balanced lines. Nothing else has changed other than the face cosmetics of the deck. Same DAC, same twin DSP chips-same tuning options. I found no SQ differences between my 8443 and my 8455.
I agree completely; however, Max, you would agree that the DSP features with respect to tuning are far superior in the 8455 (the crossover alone stomps the 8443 - I have owned both, too). Adam, you are spouting nonsense.
 
Switchin 2 tha 8445.................savin money and im goin passive

I heard a 8053 and to be honest i really didnt see too many differences between them.........i just prefer the cosmetics of the 8445 and 8455 rather than the 8053

 
Switchin 2 tha 8445.................savin money and im goin passiveI heard a 8053 and to be honest i really didnt see too many differences between them.........i just prefer the cosmetics of the 8445 and 8455 rather than the 8053
Seriously, what did you listen to this deck with?? Your system.? Anyway I can't believe ANYONE would like the looks of the new decks compared to the 8053. To each his own but hey atleast you'll have a deck that makes you think of Xmas.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Seriously, what did you listen to this deck with?? Your system.? Anyway I can't believe ANYONE would like the looks of the new decks compared to the 8053. To each his own but hey atleast you'll have a deck that makes you think of Xmas.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
I wanted to get the 8454, but the 8455 was offered to me for 320 shipped, and well I couldnt pass it up lol. The more I look at it, the more I like it. 8455 I love thee

 
Adam, you are spouting nonsense.

the boy needs attention...have you not noticed?
First of all you can both ********* yourselves with an iron stick. LOL

Seriously though, I'm just saying I think the 8053 is a better deck because I'm a purist. I prefer seperate components over all in one decks any day of the week. The less going on in one chassis the better. If you disagree thats your perogative and I could really care less.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

bdawson72

5,000+ posts
Finally Has Bass Again
Thread starter
bdawson72
Joined
Location
434/804, Virginia 15's:Yezzir
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
30
Views
2,479
Last reply date
Last reply from
adam71
IMG_0710.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_0709.png

michigan born

    May 14, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top