Dick move

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

1.8t is teh loose

vr6 5-speed or GTFO

 

[PepsiFiend69 10+ year member]

Can't a VR and 1.8T get about the same results with the same money while the 1.8T will keep good mileage?
I was looking at the VRTs and saw a lot of people mention they were only getting mid-teens with them //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

yeah, well without going to far, as far as bolt ons, i can smoke a VR's any day with my car now, all it's got is chip, turbo back and cams

VRT, that's a whole different story.

I don't car to much about quarter mile times. obviously its a VW it's never gonna run 8's or 9's without an all motor, strictly racing setup.

i'd rather have a car that was decently fast, that you can still drive everyday, and be comfortable in.

us VW guys are a little diffrent then most "tuners"

 

[PepsiFiend69 10+ year member]

1.8t is teh loose
vr6 5-speed or GTFO

QFT

except 6 speed vr FTMFW

 

[Banana Balls 5,000+ posts]

This thread just got retarded.

It should be locked due to delivery fail.

 

[DBfan187 5,000+ posts]

post this on 4chan

 

[crunktimes.com 5,000+ posts]

1.8t is teh loose
vr6 5-speed or GTFO

Car to elaborate why? Not a smartass question just wondering. They both seem to take about the same amount of work to get around 300hp. I read up on the Vr6 for a while figuring that would be the best option then looked into the 1.8 also.. only downside I could see to doing a 1.8 was you need a bigger turbo but gets better MPG.

P.S. I know shit about cars this would just be something for me to mess around with and learn.

 

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

Car to elaborate why? Not a smartass question just wondering. They both seem to take about the same amount of work to get around 300hp. I read up on the Vr6 for a while figuring that would be the best option then looked into the 1.8 also.. only downside I could see to doing a 1.8 was you need a bigger turbo but gets better MPG.
P.S. I know shit about cars this would just be something for me to mess around with and learn.

never built one. just drove both and vr6 pwns. stock for stock. thats all i can vouch for without BS

 

[PepsiFiend69 10+ year member]

Car to elaborate why? Not a smartass question just wondering. They both seem to take about the same amount of work to get around 300hp. I read up on the Vr6 for a while figuring that would be the best option then looked into the 1.8 also.. only downside I could see to doing a 1.8 was you need a bigger turbo but gets better MPG.
P.S. I know shit about cars this would just be something for me to mess around with and learn.

if you're looking for something to look mess around with on the cheap, get a 1.8t, definitely best dollar for dollar performace wise. you can make 250 @ the wheels from a measly stock 165ish at the wheels for under $1k

not the fastest on the freeway, but its fun to rip around town, and on some backroads

they'll both get to a point where you can't get much more power without a turbo/big turbo/internals.

anyways.... back on topic

 

[76kx 10+ year member]

It's your ex for christ sakes. Be glad he isn't asking to stick his dork in your pooper.

 

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

99-00 GTI + DOHC 4.6 = teh secks.

never seen it, but would be ridiculous with a big block, or similar

 

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

oh, and where is teh bush pics?

 

[Banana Balls 5,000+ posts]

oh, and where is teh bush pics?

 

[groundpound4200 5,000+ posts]

WTF happened to this thread? ummm yah i drive a veee dob

 

[DBfan187 5,000+ posts]

That bush is green, stay away! FAR AWAY!

 

[jco1385 5,000+ posts]

quoted for annoyance purposes

but that is the wrong bush //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif