Current events discussion

Usung facts and evidence.
Not threatening violence.
Not demanding that one's opinions be accepted as fact, simply becasue one has them.
Not making declarative statements as facts, when they are easily proved to be lies.
Not parroting unfounded nonsense, without performing any due diligence.
Not blindly believing and promulgating things one hears, simply because the support one's narrative.
Not countering facts and evidence with phrases like "you're a liberal ****".

And so on.
You gonna stop doing all that as well?
 
Last edited:
Usung facts and evidence.
Not threatening violence.
Not demanding that one's opinions be accepted as fact, simply becasue one has them.
Not making declarative statements as facts, when they are easily proved to be lies.
Not parroting unfounded nonsense, without performing any due diligence.

Not countering facts and evidence with phrases like "you're a liberal ****".

And so on.
There is a huge problem here with what you listed. You see, YOU think you are always right and every one else is wrong. You deny proof and facts that we provide but for some reason want us to accept what you call facts as the be all end all of the conversation. You think that if something is repeated on this forum it is unfounded nonsense. You assume nobody researches before they post. You claim people are demanding YOU accept their opinions as facts. But this one here... you blind moron:
"Not blindly believing and promulgating things one hears, simply because the support one's narrative." - RobGMN
You stupid liberal ****. This is all you do.
 
You should practice what you preach then. I presented you with facts and laws and what did you do?

Coupling to the crime of New York Penal Law 175.05, prosecutors must establish that your intent to defraud involved further criminal intent to either hide the commission of another crime or to assist in the commission of that other crime.
I listed the other crimes that were part of the court documentation.
Your refusal to read or understand what you read doesn't constitute a failure for them to exist.






So you have been presented the actual laws and what is required BY LAW to turn those misdemeanors into felonies and even though they list no other intended crime which is needed BY LAW to turn those misdemeanors into felonies they somehow list 34 felonies and say convicted.
I listed the other crimes that were part of the court documentation.
Your refusal to read or understand what you read doesn't constitute a failure for them to exist.
Judge Juan Merchan is a Democrat. This case was a MAJOR conflict of interest for him.
In that case, every SCOTUS decision where Trump was deemed innocent must be thrown out and re-tried.
Or did you forget that the SCOTUS is majority right?

We can also bring back those impeachements, since it was the biased right voting in Trump's favor.
Good job.


Jim Jordam is a Republican. He must be biased, so none of that report has value.
Right?
 
But you do the same thing and go a step further and lie about what people say in order to fit your own narrative, regardless of how damaging the lie is. Lying about other people to make yourself look better is what children do.
You and several other nitwits here continue to make claimns about me that cannot be substantiarted in any way.

Go ahead and show me where I have lied about what someone posted on this site.
Be VERY specific. No one is accepting just your personal guaranty that it happened.
Post numbers, or screenshots of the post.

And while you're at it, go ahead and post proof for your previous claims that I threadcrapped in one of your sales thereads.
I asked for that proof probably five or six times, but you failed to provide it. Instead, you spun off on one of your usual tangents.

Spin back, and post the proofs.
 
Last edited:
I listed the other crimes that were part of the court documentation.
Your refusal to read or understand what you read doesn't constitute a failure for them to exist.

I listed the other crimes that were part of the court documentation.
Your refusal to read or understand what you read doesn't constitute a failure for them to exist.

In that case, every SCOTUS decision where Trump was deemed innocent must be thrown out and re-tried.
Or did you forget that the SCOTUS is majority right?

We can also bring back those impeachements, since it was the biased right voting in Trump's favor.
Good job.



Jim Jordam is a Republican. He must be biased, so none of that report has value.
Right?
Splish Splash I was taking a bath. Show me the convictions for another crime in that list of 34. YOU are just repeating the same bullshit your team has repeated and has told you to keep repeating.
 
You and several other nitwits here continue to make claimns about me that cannot be substantiarted in any way.

Go ahead and show me where I have lied about what someone posted on this site.
Be VERY specific. No one is accepting just your personal guaranty that it happened.
Post numbers, or screenshots of the post.

And while you're at it, go ahead and post proof for your previous claims that I threadcrapped in one of your sales thereads.
I asked for that proof probably five or six times, but you failed to provide it. Instead, you spun off on one of your usual tangents.

Spin back, and post the proofs.
Remember... Rob said stupid people need things clarified. What is he demanding yet again? More clarification.
 
You and several other nitwits here continue to make claimns about me that cannot be substantiarted in any way.

Go ahead and show me where I have lied about what someone posted on this site.
Be VERY specific. No one is accepting just your personal guaranty that it happened.
Post numbers, or screenshots of the post.

And while you're at it, go ahead and post proof for your previous claims that I threadcrapped in one of your sales thereads.
I asked for that proof probably five or six times, but you failed to provide it. Instead, you spun off on one of your usual tangents.

Spin back, and post the proofs.
Why do you keep pretending like you're an honest person?
 
Splish Splash I was taking a bath. Show me the convictions for another crime in that list of 34. YOU are just repeating the same bullshit your team has repeated and has told you to keep repeating.
I really hope you just feign the extreme level of stupidity that you show here.
If not, I feel bad for your family, and anyone that interacts with you in person.

Tell me, when you get convicted under the "thrid strike" law, do you think that conviction includes new convictions to show that there were two previous convictions?

The conviction for the offenses that make what he did class E felonies ARE PART OF THE CONVICTION FOR THE FELONY.
If you are convicted of the felony, you are being convicted of all components of the felony.

It shouldn't be necessary to explain this to a guy who thinks he can mount a better defense than Trump's entire legal team was able to produce.
 
There is a huge problem here with what you listed. You see, YOU think you are always right and every one else is wrong. You deny proof and facts that we provide but for some reason want us to accept what you call facts as the be all end all of the conversation. You think that if something is repeated on this forum it is unfounded nonsense. You assume nobody researches before they post. You claim people are demanding YOU accept their opinions as facts. But this one here... you blind moron:
"Not blindly believing and promulgating things one hears, simply because the support one's narrative." - RobGMN
You stupid liberal ****. This is all you do.
He is always right, hence his nickname Alway Right Rob. Just like Sleepy Joe, Rob's nickname is literal.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,847
Views
463,136
Last reply date
Last reply from
RobGMN
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top